Re: [gentoo-user] IP Masquerading hardware, crossover versus hub

2006-08-10 Thread Jure Varlec
On Thursday 10 August 2006 05:22, Iain Buchanan wrote:
 Go not to gentoo-user for council, for they will say both hub and no
 hub.

I say switch :P

-- 
Jure Varlec


pgpD1wbHFlNoA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] IP Masquerading hardware, crossover versus hub

2006-08-09 Thread THUFIR HAWAT

I want a setup such as at
http://www.fs-security.com/docs/pics/complexnat.png and am reading
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/index.html to that
end.  However, there are just two machines, the gateway and a
secondary.

There's also a diagram at
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/ipmasq-background2.5.html.

The gateway (?) is arrakis, the other machine is geidi_prime.  Arrakis
has a wireless connection, so geidi_prime needs to connect via arrakis
for the internet.

The two computers will probably be 20+feet apart.  Would it make more
sense to use a hub or crossover cable?


thanks,

Thufir
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] IP Masquerading hardware, crossover versus hub

2006-08-09 Thread Lord Sauron

On 8/9/06, THUFIR HAWAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I want a setup such as at
http://www.fs-security.com/docs/pics/complexnat.png and am reading
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/index.html to that
end.  However, there are just two machines, the gateway and a
secondary.

There's also a diagram at
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/ipmasq-background2.5.html.

The gateway (?) is arrakis, the other machine is geidi_prime.  Arrakis
has a wireless connection, so geidi_prime needs to connect via arrakis
for the internet.

The two computers will probably be 20+feet apart.  Would it make more
sense to use a hub or crossover cable?


Yes, use a hub.  Then when Caladan, Ix, Draconus_IV, Salusa_Secundus,
and finally Tleiax enter your network, they too can be connected to
the Spacing Guild as well. ; )

Then, if you want various transient satellites (wireless laptops,
perhaps) to use wireless, then I'd have a cable from the hub to a
wireless hub.  Try to keep that wireless access point secured though.
It might be better to keep a firewall in between the wireless access
point and the rest of your network just to keep things secure.  A
hardware firewall, of course.  I don't place much faith in software
ones.  But that's your decision.  I just said how I'd build a network
given that objective of setup.

Hope you find something that works!

--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+
   DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y
= END GCv3.12 
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] IP Masquerading hardware, crossover versus hub

2006-08-09 Thread THUFIR HAWAT

On 8/9/06, Lord Sauron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]

Yes, use a hub.  Then when Caladan, Ix, Draconus_IV, Salusa_Secundus,
and finally Tleiax enter your network, they too can be connected to
the Spacing Guild as well. ; )

[...]

Thanks for completing the picture :)

arrakis connects wirelessly to the 802.11b router.  The router belongs
to a neighbor, with whom I, and another party, share the connection.

I like that of the two replies, one was hub and one was no hub :)



-Thufir
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] IP Masquerading hardware, crossover versus hub

2006-08-09 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 03:08 +0100, THUFIR HAWAT wrote:

 I like that of the two replies, one was hub and one was no hub :)

Go not to gentoo-user for council, for they will say both hub and no
hub.

;)
-- 
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au

Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list