Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

2005-11-06 Thread Richard Fish

Zhang Weiwu wrote:


Richard Fish wrote:
 


Zhang Weiwu wrote:
   


These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl +eds +gnome +gtk
+java -kde +ldap +mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB
 


Well, these USE flags are quite different than what I use, so
comparing to my system is probably not useful.

But, could you try an equery check openoffice, and see if it reports
any problems?

I remember that when I compiled OOo2, it took over 3Gb of space in
/var, and my /usr/lib/openoffice directory is using 228M.  Maybe you
ran out of disk space at some point during the merge, which is why you
are missing files???

-Richard
   


I don't understand: if it run out of space, how comes the package marked
as installed. I have about 3.8G free hdd space though.
 



Well, it should have failed...but it is the only explanation I can think 
of that would account for why you are missing libraries, other than 
filesystem corruption and the libraries being moved to lost+found.  My 
guess is 3.8G is close to being enough, but not quite, because you must 
have room for the compiled sources plus an install template (~225M), 
plus the installed files (~225M).  Also, I don't have an exact figure on 
the amount of space necessary to build OOo, since I wasn't paying very 
close attention, but I do know that it was well over 3G.



[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ equery check openoffice
[ Checking app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 ]
* 880 out of 880 files good
 



Hmm, I think there is something bad here.  My check of openoffice shows 
2674 files.  I doubt such a huge difference can be attributed to USE flags.



I think I can try compile with your USE flags later.
 



Unless you want to merge large parts of KDE as well, I wouldn't! ;-)

But you might try to free up some space and build again.  Deleting old 
distfiles is usually enough to free up a gigabyte or so.  Also, remember 
that with ext3, running out of inodes is just as bad as running out of 
space, so if you use ext3, you might want to make sure you have plenty 
available with dumpe2fs -h | grep 'Free inodes'.  The sources are 
nearly 10 files, so I would say that 15 available inodes should 
be sufficient for an OOo build.


Of course, you could also just merge the -bin and be done with it. :-)

-Richard

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

2005-11-05 Thread Zhang Weiwu
Richard Fish wrote:

 Zhang Weiwu wrote:

 It took me one day to emerge from source. I tried SEARCH_DIRS_MASK but
 that doesn't work for me.
  


 Yes, the SEARCH_DIRS_MASK is only for revdep-rebuild and for those who
 merged the binary package.  You do not need it when merging from
 source, and has no effect on your ability to start OOo.

 These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

 Calculating dependencies ...done!
 [ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl +eds +gnome +gtk
 +java -kde +ldap +mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB
  


 Well, these USE flags are quite different than what I use, so
 comparing to my system is probably not useful.

 But, could you try an equery check openoffice, and see if it reports
 any problems?

 I remember that when I compiled OOo2, it took over 3Gb of space in
 /var, and my /usr/lib/openoffice directory is using 228M.  Maybe you
 ran out of disk space at some point during the merge, which is why you
 are missing files???

 -Richard

I don't understand: if it run out of space, how comes the package marked
as installed. I have about 3.8G free hdd space though.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ equery check openoffice
[ Checking app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 ]
 * 880 out of 880 files good

I think I can try compile with your USE flags later.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

2005-11-03 Thread Zhang Weiwu
After successfully merged, it goes like this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ oowriter2
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared
libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
libraries: libvcl680li.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libuno_sal.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libvcl680li.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I blackdown-jre
dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 *
Blackdown Java Runtime Environment  [ http://www.blackdown.org ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I openoffice
app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 *
OpenOffice.org, a full office productivity suite. [
http://go-oo.org ]

looks to me this file libuno_sal.so.3 does exist on another machine
OpenOffice installation where it is installed by the 1.9 installer,
under programs folder.

Looks like a very obvious problem, why seems no discussion about it? Is
it just me who have this problem?
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

2005-11-03 Thread Ryan L

Zhang Weiwu wrote:


After successfully merged, it goes like this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ oowriter2
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared
libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
libraries: libvcl680li.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libuno_sal.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libvcl680li.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I blackdown-jre
dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 *
   Blackdown Java Runtime Environment  [ http://www.blackdown.org ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I openoffice
app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 *
   OpenOffice.org, a full office productivity suite. [
http://go-oo.org ]

looks to me this file libuno_sal.so.3 does exist on another machine
OpenOffice installation where it is installed by the 1.9 installer,
under programs folder.

Looks like a very obvious problem, why seems no discussion about it? Is
it just me who have this problem?
 



Not sure if mine is related, but when running revdep-rebuild it gives me 
a LOT of errors about openoffice needing some libraries and then 
remerges OO2.0. All fine and dandy, but running revdep-rebuild again 
afterward gives the same thing. I've done this about 4 times in a row. 
Perhaps OO2.0 isn't handling its libraries correctly. Or maybe an ebuild 
error?

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

2005-11-03 Thread 赵光
2005/11/4, Ryan L [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Zhang Weiwu wrote:

are you chinese,if you are chinese ,please give firefly OOo2 a try,
i think it will work well for you.

--
/
* Love in Gentoo-Linux  C and Python   *
* Look at my blog  *
* http://poorc.wordpress.com   *
/

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

2005-11-03 Thread Richard Fish

Zhang Weiwu wrote:


After successfully merged, it goes like this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ oowriter2
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared
libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
libraries: libvcl680li.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libuno_sal.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libvcl680li.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I blackdown-jre
dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 *
   Blackdown Java Runtime Environment  [ http://www.blackdown.org ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I openoffice
app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 *
   OpenOffice.org, a full office productivity suite. [
http://go-oo.org ]
 



Did you emerge the bin, or build from sources?  I emerged openoffice 
with -java, so I don't have any javaldx as part of my openoffice 
installation.  But I do have libvcl680li.so, and libuno_sal.so:


carcharias program # ls -l libuno_sal.* libvcl680li.so
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  15 Nov  2 14:28 libuno_sal.so - 
libuno_sal.so.3

-r--r--r--  1 root root 1814568 Oct 23 18:12 libuno_sal.so.3
-r--r--r--  1 root root 3402428 Oct 23 18:12 libvcl680li.so
carcharias program # pwd
/usr/lib/openoffice/program
carcharias program # emerge -Dv --pretend openoffice

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl -eds -gnome +gtk 
-java +kde -ldap -mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB


-Richard

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

2005-11-03 Thread Richard Fish

Ryan L wrote:

Not sure if mine is related, but when running revdep-rebuild it gives 
me a LOT of errors about openoffice needing some libraries and then 
remerges OO2.0. All fine and dandy, but running revdep-rebuild again 
afterward gives the same thing. I've done this about 4 times in a row. 
Perhaps OO2.0 isn't handling its libraries correctly. Or maybe an 
ebuild error?



If you have emerged the binary package, this is normal, because the 
binary version sticks private versions of all libraries and even python 
in the openoffice directory, where it can't be found without setting 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment.  If you did merge the binary, update 
/etc/make.conf to set SEARCH_DIRS_MASK=/usr/lib/openoffice.


-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

2005-11-03 Thread Ryan L

Richard Fish wrote:


Ryan L wrote:

Not sure if mine is related, but when running revdep-rebuild it gives 
me a LOT of errors about openoffice needing some libraries and then 
remerges OO2.0. All fine and dandy, but running revdep-rebuild again 
afterward gives the same thing. I've done this about 4 times in a 
row. Perhaps OO2.0 isn't handling its libraries correctly. Or maybe 
an ebuild error?




If you have emerged the binary package, this is normal, because the 
binary version sticks private versions of all libraries and even 
python in the openoffice directory, where it can't be found without 
setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment.  If you did merge the 
binary, update /etc/make.conf to set 
SEARCH_DIRS_MASK=/usr/lib/openoffice.


-Richard


Thank you sir! Worked like a charm! I just had to use lib32 instead of 
lib since I'm on amd64, but still worked perfectly! Thanks!


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

2005-11-03 Thread Zhang Weiwu
Richard Fish wrote:

 Zhang Weiwu wrote:

 After successfully merged, it goes like this:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ oowriter2
 /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared
 libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
 or directory
 /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
 libraries: libvcl680li.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
 or directory
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libuno_sal.so
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libvcl680li.so
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I blackdown-jre
 dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 *
Blackdown Java Runtime Environment  [ http://www.blackdown.org ]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I openoffice
 app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 *
OpenOffice.org, a full office productivity suite. [
 http://go-oo.org ]
  


 Did you emerge the bin, or build from sources?

It took me one day to emerge from source. I tried SEARCH_DIRS_MASK but
that doesn't work for me.

   I emerged openoffice with -java, so I don't have any javaldx as
 part of my openoffice installation.  But I do have libvcl680li.so, and
 libuno_sal.so:

 carcharias program # ls -l libuno_sal.* libvcl680li.so
 lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  15 Nov  2 14:28 libuno_sal.so -
 libuno_sal.so.3
 -r--r--r--  1 root root 1814568 Oct 23 18:12 libuno_sal.so.3
 -r--r--r--  1 root root 3402428 Oct 23 18:12 libvcl680li.so
 carcharias program # pwd
 /usr/lib/openoffice/program
 carcharias program # emerge -Dv --pretend openoffice

 These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

 Calculating dependencies ...done!
 [ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl -eds -gnome +gtk
 -java +kde -ldap -mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB

 -Richard

More helpful debug message:

Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program # ls -l libuno* libvcl*
ls: libvcl*: No such file or directory.
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 26 11月  1 23:52 libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so -
libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 16 11月  1 23:52 libuno_cppu.so - libuno_cppu.so.3

Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge -Dv
--pretend openoffice

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl +eds +gnome +gtk
+java -kde +ldap +mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB

Total size of downloads: 0 kB

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list