Re: [gentoo-user] OT: governors (was: Is cpufrequtils needed these days?)

2010-07-02 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Freitag 02 Juli 2010, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 07:52:02PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
  On Sonntag 28 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
   or is the kernel itself clever enough to manage the hardware directly
   these days?
  
  yes, it is. Just use the ondemand governor.
 
 I've noticed what looks like some work overloads using the ondemand
 governor. I'm pretty sure it is normal but I can see (user feeling) when
 the system loads the processor by intermittence. It is visible on some
 compilations tasks and when playing flash videos and compared to the
 performance governor. I'm still runing a 2.6.26 kernel.

of course there is a little difference. Performance is not a governor. It just 
sets the cpu at always full speed. So it does not have any ramp up time - but 
also blows away a lot of energy AND generates unnecessary heat.



[gentoo-user] OT: governors (was: Is cpufrequtils needed these days?)

2010-07-01 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 07:52:02PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
 
 On Sonntag 28 Februar 2010, Mick wrote:
 
  or is the kernel itself clever enough to manage the hardware directly
  these days?
 
 yes, it is. Just use the ondemand governor.

I've noticed what looks like some work overloads using the ondemand
governor. I'm pretty sure it is normal but I can see (user feeling) when
the system loads the processor by intermittence. It is visible on some
compilations tasks and when playing flash videos and compared to the
performance governor. I'm still runing a 2.6.26 kernel.

Just a user back report.

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht