Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ridiculous nagging problem unable to ping

2008-12-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:44:35 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:

 Not only can I ping the router... but I can connect with tcp to
 anything I want to on the internet.  
 
 Its just that I can't ping the internet.

I thought you couldn't ping the rest of the LAN either?

If the only box you can ping is the router,it sounds like a router setting
somewhere. What happens if you plug the computer into a different port on
the router? Does the router have any DMZ features turned on?


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Ninety-Ninety Rule Of Project Schedules - The first ninety percent of
the task takes ninety percent of the time, and the last ten percent
takes the other ninety percent of the time.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Re: Ridiculous nagging problem unable to ping

2008-12-08 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:44:35 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:

 Not only can I ping the router... but I can connect with tcp to
 anything I want to on the internet.  
 
 Its just that I can't ping the internet.

 I thought you couldn't ping the rest of the LAN either?

No.  I can ping anywhere on the home lan.  Sorry if that was not
clear. 

 If the only box you can ping is the router,it sounds like a router setting
 somewhere. What happens if you plug the computer into a different port on
 the router? Does the router have any DMZ features turned on?

I can ping any box inside the lan, including the router, but even then
it still sounds like a router setting since any other lan box can ping
out to internet with no problem.  However I cannot find a router
setting that would do that.  And I have no special setting in place
that I can find.

About DMZ, yes the router has the capability to send to a DMZ but it
is disabled.

my network is simple and looks like (hope this survivs mail encoding):

  Cable modem to internet
   |
   |
 =  Netgear FVS-318 gateway  ==
  |  |   |  || 
 mch1  mch2mch3   mch4 mch5
^^
  ^
  ^
no ping to internet
From above mch1
But it can ping any of 
the other mchs including router  




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ridiculous nagging problem unable to ping

2008-12-08 Thread Mark Knecht
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:44:35 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:

 Not only can I ping the router... but I can connect with tcp to
 anything I want to on the internet.

 Its just that I can't ping the internet.

 I thought you couldn't ping the rest of the LAN either?

 No.  I can ping anywhere on the home lan.  Sorry if that was not
 clear.

 If the only box you can ping is the router,it sounds like a router setting
 somewhere. What happens if you plug the computer into a different port on
 the router? Does the router have any DMZ features turned on?

 I can ping any box inside the lan, including the router, but even then
 it still sounds like a router setting since any other lan box can ping
 out to internet with no problem.  However I cannot find a router
 setting that would do that.  And I have no special setting in place
 that I can find.

 About DMZ, yes the router has the capability to send to a DMZ but it
 is disabled.

 my network is simple and looks like (hope this survivs mail encoding):

  Cable modem to internet
   |
   |
  =  Netgear FVS-318 gateway  ==
  |  |   |  ||
  mch1  mch2mch3   mch4 mch5
 ^^
  ^
  ^
 no ping to internet
 From above mch1
 But it can ping any of
 the other mchs including router


I agree with Neil. It sounds like a router issue. Possibly a DMZ
setting in the router is the same as the IP of the machine that
doesn't work correctly so the ping gets to the DMZ and the response is
sent out to the Internet instead of back inside?

If the 5 internal machines have consecutive addresses, have you tried
changing the IP address of the machine that doesn't work to something
above #5? Maybe disconnect one of the other machines and give the
problem box that IP address?

I don't think you stated how the problem box got its address. Is it
fixed IP or something provided by the router?

- Mark



[gentoo-user] Re: Ridiculous nagging problem unable to ping

2008-12-08 Thread Harry Putnam
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I agree with Neil. It sounds like a router issue. Possibly a DMZ
 setting in the router is the same as the IP of the machine that
 doesn't work correctly so the ping gets to the DMZ and the response is
 sent out to the Internet instead of back inside?

I agree too.

I once had a DMZ setting set up on the router long ago.  The address
was 192.168.0.19. It was an old home machine running openbsd with a pf
firewall. 

Currently no machine on the lan has that address and the DMZ
capability is disabled at the router anyway.  (I just checked again
for about the 10th time.)

 I don't think you stated how the problem box got its address. Is it
 fixed IP or something provided by the router?

They are assigned by hand (by me) so static IPs.

 If the 5 internal machines have consecutive addresses, have you tried
 changing the IP address of the machine that doesn't work to something
 above #5? Maybe disconnect one of the other machines and give the
 problem box that IP address?

No I haven't but I'll try it now... just ifconfigging up a new
address.

  ifconfig eth0 down
  ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.27  =was 192.168.0.4
  route add default gw 192.168.0.20
  
  ping ftp.ucsb.edu
  PING ftp.ucsb.edu (128.111.24.43) 56(84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from ftp.ucsb.edu (128.111.24.43): icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=129 ms
  64 bytes from ftp.ucsb.edu (128.111.24.43): icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=117 ms
[...]

Oh boy, we in the chips now.

Yippeee

I new there would be some simple common sense test I would have
overlooked.  Thanks.

So that proves something is blocking that particular address
182.168.0.4 and that seems almost certainly to be something on the
router. 

It must be a setting I cannot find and it must be for icmp only since
I've been able to traceroute or any other kind of connect, right
along.

I could just change that machines address but it would mean changing
all other machines hosts files and such not too big a deal I
guess.

Might be easier to reset the router to default factory condition and
and then set it up for my needs which wouldn't be much work either.
It has a little hole where you press a pin and reset it.

Is there any chance the blockage is coming from something on that
machine and not the router?




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ridiculous nagging problem unable to ping

2008-12-08 Thread Mark Knecht
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I agree with Neil. It sounds like a router issue. Possibly a DMZ
 setting in the router is the same as the IP of the machine that
 doesn't work correctly so the ping gets to the DMZ and the response is
 sent out to the Internet instead of back inside?

 I agree too.

 I once had a DMZ setting set up on the router long ago.  The address
 was 192.168.0.19. It was an old home machine running openbsd with a pf
 firewall.

 Currently no machine on the lan has that address and the DMZ
 capability is disabled at the router anyway.  (I just checked again
 for about the 10th time.)

 I don't think you stated how the problem box got its address. Is it
 fixed IP or something provided by the router?

 They are assigned by hand (by me) so static IPs.

 If the 5 internal machines have consecutive addresses, have you tried
 changing the IP address of the machine that doesn't work to something
 above #5? Maybe disconnect one of the other machines and give the
 problem box that IP address?

 No I haven't but I'll try it now... just ifconfigging up a new
 address.

  ifconfig eth0 down
  ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.27  =was 192.168.0.4
  route add default gw 192.168.0.20

  ping ftp.ucsb.edu
  PING ftp.ucsb.edu (128.111.24.43) 56(84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from ftp.ucsb.edu (128.111.24.43): icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=129 ms
  64 bytes from ftp.ucsb.edu (128.111.24.43): icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=117 ms
 [...]

 Oh boy, we in the chips now.

 Yippeee

 I new there would be some simple common sense test I would have
 overlooked.  Thanks.

 So that proves something is blocking that particular address
 182.168.0.4 and that seems almost certainly to be something on the
 router.

 It must be a setting I cannot find and it must be for icmp only since
 I've been able to traceroute or any other kind of connect, right
 along.

 I could just change that machines address but it would mean changing
 all other machines hosts files and such not too big a deal I
 guess.

 Might be easier to reset the router to default factory condition and
 and then set it up for my needs which wouldn't be much work either.
 It has a little hole where you press a pin and reset it.

 Is there any chance the blockage is coming from something on that
 machine and not the router?

I don't think there's much chance the problem is on the machine. I
don't know much about these things though.

As for the router I would consider looking for a router firmware
update. I've had a couple of funny problems over the years with my
LinkSys routers. Usually installing more up-to-date firmware has fixed
them.

Glad you are making headway.

Cheers,
Mark



[gentoo-user] Re: Ridiculous nagging problem unable to ping

2008-12-07 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:35:34 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:

 All sitting behind a netgear FVS-318
 
 None and I mean absolutely none of those other machines have any
 trouble pinging out to the internet.

 Can you ping the other machines on your LAN?

 Does iptables -L show anything?

No and no... I tried to answer some of those kind of questions in my
OP, sorry it wasn't that clear.




[gentoo-user] Re: Ridiculous nagging problem unable to ping

2008-12-07 Thread Harry Putnam
Norberto Bensa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Quoting Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags   MSS Window
 irtt Iface
 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0 0  0 eth0
 127.0.0.0   127.0.0.1   255.0.0.0   UG0 0  0 lo
 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.200.0.0.0 UG0 0  0 eth0


 192.168.0.20 is really your gateway?

Yes Its a Netgear FVS-318 router at the head of my home lan between
lan and internet cable modem.


 what's iptables-save output?

Iptable is turned off as mentioned in OP

iptables-save:
iptables-save v1.4.2: Unable to open /proc/net/ip_tables_names: 
   No such file or directory

 ping is the thing you can't do?

Yes.  Again its like this:

I can ping inside the lan no problem
I cannot ping outside the lan but all other lan machines can.

All machines are gatewayed to the same router.  The router config
shows no indication of blocking any part of the lan.  
Router logs show nothing but anyway, logging only occurs in bound.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ridiculous nagging problem unable to ping

2008-12-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:30:05 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:

 Yes Its a Netgear FVS-318 router at the head of my home lan between
 lan and internet cable modem.

Can you ping the router?


-- 
Neil Bothwick

With free advice you often get what you pay for.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Re: Ridiculous nagging problem unable to ping

2008-12-07 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:30:05 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:

 Yes Its a Netgear FVS-318 router at the head of my home lan between
 lan and internet cable modem.

 Can you ping the router?

Yes, usually my first test during network hookups.  Its just such a
natural thing to ping outside for testing resolv.conf, that its quite
aggravating every time I forget which machine I'm on and try it from
the one where it won't work.

Not only can I ping the router... but I can connect with tcp to
anything I want to on the internet.  

Its just that I can't ping the internet.  So its something I can live
with for the most part but every so often the ingrained habit of ping
testing something outside will cause me some aggravation.

That would seem to indicate some sort of icmp blocking but again, I
can not see any evidence of that on the router.