Re: [gentoo-user] Re: eudev

2015-02-10 Thread Dale
James wrote:
 Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:

 Basically, after you switch, the OS doesn't see anything different.  On
 mine here, even the init scripts have the same name.  I was sort of
 expecting them to change from udev to eudev but it didn't. 
 Good to know. Any mods to any of those udev-init-scripts or are they the
 same_same ?

I think it replaces it but I'm not sure.  I didn't look to see what the
old looked like before switching.  I don't recall it wanting to change
it when I ran dispatch-conf either.  It has been a while back tho. 


 If something is pulling udev back in, may want to add the -t option to
 emerge and see what is pulling it in. 
 Yea, it was late, I was tired and often premature_alzheimers is not
 really premature..

 Dale
 thx,
 James


I hear you on that.  I think it hits me double at times.  :/

Dale

:-)  :-) 



[gentoo-user] Re: eudev

2015-02-10 Thread James
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:

 Basically, after you switch, the OS doesn't see anything different.  On
 mine here, even the init scripts have the same name.  I was sort of
 expecting them to change from udev to eudev but it didn't. 

Good to know. Any mods to any of those udev-init-scripts or are they the
same_same ?

 If something is pulling udev back in, may want to add the -t option to
 emerge and see what is pulling it in. 

Yea, it was late, I was tired and often premature_alzheimers is not
really premature..

 Dale

thx,
James








[gentoo-user] Re: eudev

2012-12-18 Thread James
Bryan Gardiner bog at khumba.net writes:



  I did recently put these into my package.keywords.

  =sys-fs/udev-196-r1 ~amd64
  =virtual/udev-196 ~amd64
  =sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-17-r1 ~amd64

 My guess is that you've unmasked sys-fs/udev-196 only partially.
 Portage tries to calculate the dependencies for it and finds that
 something is still missing (e.g. you need to ~amd64 more packages) so
 Portage stops with sys-fs/udev and tries to satisfy virtual/udev with
 eudev instead.

I was cleaning up a python 3.1 mess on the system. Days
of rebuilding stuff for python 3.2 after removal of python
3.1. and building kde-4.9.3

 Try an emerge -pv =sys-fs/udev-196-r1 and see if that gives any
 reason why Portage isn't happy with it.

ebuild   R   ~] sys-fs/udev-196-r1  USE=acl gudev hwdb introspection keymap
kmod openrc -doc (-selinux) -static-libs 0 kB


Since I've been following the threads on eudev, I do not want to be
out front on this issue.

I put /var/ and /usr on the same partition as /

I do have other partitions, such as /usr/local/video1 (etc)

But I just put /boot / and swamp for the OS on all the gentoo
system I need. So I think I should go back to udev 181 ?
I only went to udev 196-r1 to clean up the system (late at night
just rebuilding and doing what portage wanted to keep rebuilding
everything

In summary, since I put /var and /usr on the / partition
what my best (mainstream) path for udev and all the issues
(flags and other packages) to stay mainstream-stable?

I'm not sure I fully understand what my best path forward is...


advice?
James






Re: [gentoo-user] Re: eudev

2012-12-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:07:02 + (UTC)
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:

 Bryan Gardiner bog at khumba.net writes:
 
 
 
   I did recently put these into my package.keywords.
 
   =sys-fs/udev-196-r1 ~amd64
   =virtual/udev-196 ~amd64
   =sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-17-r1 ~amd64
 
  My guess is that you've unmasked sys-fs/udev-196 only partially.
  Portage tries to calculate the dependencies for it and finds that
  something is still missing (e.g. you need to ~amd64 more packages)
  so Portage stops with sys-fs/udev and tries to satisfy virtual/udev
  with eudev instead.
 
 I was cleaning up a python 3.1 mess on the system. Days
 of rebuilding stuff for python 3.2 after removal of python
 3.1. and building kde-4.9.3
 
  Try an emerge -pv =sys-fs/udev-196-r1 and see if that gives any
  reason why Portage isn't happy with it.
 
 ebuild   R   ~] sys-fs/udev-196-r1  USE=acl gudev hwdb introspection
 keymap kmod openrc -doc (-selinux) -static-libs 0 kB
 
 
 Since I've been following the threads on eudev, I do not want to be
 out front on this issue.
 
 I put /var/ and /usr on the same partition as /
 
 I do have other partitions, such as /usr/local/video1 (etc)
 
 But I just put /boot / and swamp for the OS on all the gentoo
 system I need. So I think I should go back to udev 181 ?
 I only went to udev 196-r1 to clean up the system (late at night
 just rebuilding and doing what portage wanted to keep rebuilding
 everything
 
 In summary, since I put /var and /usr on the / partition
 what my best (mainstream) path for udev and all the issues
 (flags and other packages) to stay mainstream-stable?
 
 I'm not sure I fully understand what my best path forward is...

/var is more often than not best kept separate from /, as the
filesystem needs for those two are usually quite different. Especially
with embedded devices - they can be resource constrained and don't have
spare resources to waste on inefficient configs.

As long as /usr is on the same partition as / you are safe for the
foreseeable future.

The reason for this whole / and /usr mess can be summed up in a few
words:

It's a bootstrap problem. 

Stuff could be needed at some point in the startup process before the
system is in a state to present that very stuff, so one uses bootstrap
techniques to make the stuff become available somehow when needed.

At this point in time, all this stuff reduces to one simple question:
is it located on / or is it somewhere under the /usr hierarchy? There
does not seem to be any other factor involved.



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com