Re: [gentoo-user] Ruby, Ragel, and Colm

2022-12-09 Thread Matthias Hanft
Matt Connell wrote:
> 
> Do you have any packages (or the global) keyword ~amd64?  Portage,
> fresh off of a sync, emerged ragel at 7.0.4 and col at 0.14.7 which are
> both lower than the versions you mentioned.

No ~amd64 (except dev-db/firebird because there is no stable
version at all).

(NEW) n ~ # eshowkw colm
Keywords for dev-util/colm:
 |   |   u   |
 | a   a p s r   a l |   n   |
 | m   r h   p p   i i s l o m m | e u s | r
 | d a m p p c a x a s 3 p o 6 i | a s l | e
 | 6 r 6 p p 6 r 8 6 c 9 h n 8 p | p e o | p
 | 4 m 4 a c 4 c 6 4 v 0 a g k s | i d t | o
-+---+---+---
 0.13.0.7| + + + + + + + + ~ o ~ ~ o o o | 7 # 0 | gentoo
   0.14.7| + + + + + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ | 7 o   | gentoo
   0.14.7-r1 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ | 8 #   | gentoo
[I]0.14.7-r2 | + ~ + ~ ~ + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ | 8 o   | gentoo
(NEW) n ~ # eshowkw ragel
Keywords for dev-util/ragel:
|   |   u   |
| a   a p s r   a l |   n   |
| m   r h   p p   i i s l o m m | e u s | r
| d a m p p c a x a s 3 p o 6 i | a s l | e
| 6 r 6 p p 6 r 8 6 c 9 h n 8 p | p e o | p
| 4 m 4 a c 4 c 6 4 v 0 a g k s | i d t | o
+---+---+---
6.10| + + + + + + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ | 7 # 0 | gentoo
7.0.0.12| + + + + + + + + ~ o ~ ~ o o o | 7 o   | gentoo
   7.0.4| + + + + + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ | 7 o   | gentoo
   7.0.4-r1 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ | 8 #   | gentoo
[I]7.0.4-r2 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ | 8 o   | gentoo

colm-0.14.7-r2 is marked stable; with ragel-7.0.4, I get the
error desscribed. ~ragel-7.0.4-r2 does work; didn't try
~ragel-7.0.4-r1.

But "works for me" now :-)

-Matt



Re: [gentoo-user] Ruby, Ragel, and Colm

2022-12-08 Thread Matthias Hanft
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> 
> That said, try the ~arch version of ragel. It has a patch that improves
> linking against libfsm, which appears in your error message.

Thanks, ~ragel-7.0.4-r2 did work.

(Still not knowing why the other server worked without any problems
with 7.0.4 without -r2 - but anyway...)

-Matt



Re: [gentoo-user] Ruby, Ragel, and Colm

2022-12-08 Thread Matt Connell
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 18:49 +0100, Matthias Hanft wrote:
> I just wanted to "emerge ruby" on a new Gentoo server which failed
> at dev-util/ragel-7.0.4 with
> 
>   make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/usr/lib64/libfsm.la', needed by 
> 'ragel'.  Stop.

I also had (I mean I still have the server, but I had it when it was
ruby-free, too.) a server, not new but previously Ruby-free, so I tried
to emerge it.  No errors.

Do you have any packages (or the global) keyword ~amd64?  Portage,
fresh off of a sync, emerged ragel at 7.0.4 and col at 0.14.7 which are
both lower than the versions you mentioned.





Re: [gentoo-user] Ruby, Ragel, and Colm

2022-12-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 18:49 +0100, Matthias Hanft wrote:
> 
> I hesitate to open a new Gentoo Bugzilla bug because it might not be a real 
> bug -
> but what do I have to do on my new system that ruby (and all dependencies) can
> be installed?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 

You shouldn't be afraid to open a bug, doing so has the advantage that
other people can "easily" find it if they're experiencing a similar
problem.

That said, try the ~arch version of ragel. It has a patch that improves
linking against libfsm, which appears in your error message.




[gentoo-user] Ruby, Ragel, and Colm

2022-12-08 Thread Matthias Hanft
Hi,

I just wanted to "emerge ruby" on a new Gentoo server which failed
at dev-util/ragel-7.0.4 with

  make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/usr/lib64/libfsm.la', needed by 
'ragel'.  Stop.

(immediately before, dev-util/colm-0.14.7-r2 was installed successfully)

I already have found https://bugs.gentoo.org/766210 and 
https://bugs.gentoo.org/766051
both "resolved fixed" - but apparently not?!

With ">=dev-util/ragel-7.0.1" in package.mask, ragel 7.0.0.12 and colm 0.13.0.7 
are
correctly installed. But I'm afraid that this won't be a solution forever...

Even more bizarre: On another Gentoo system I'm running for a long time, ragel 
7.0.4
and colm 0.14.7-r2 *are* correctly installed - but I've no idea any more how I 
achieved
this a very long time ago.

I hesitate to open a new Gentoo Bugzilla bug because it might not be a real bug 
-
but what do I have to do on my new system that ruby (and all dependencies) can
be installed?

Thanks in advance,

-Matt