Re: [gentoo-user] Understanding why portage wants to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk

2013-07-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:06:36 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2
 Why does the atom ~dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2 NOT apply to
 dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r2?

It applies to version 4.2 and all revisions. 4.2.9 is a different version

You need one of

=dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2*
dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2


-- 
Neil Bothwick

If Wile E. Coyote had enough money to buy all that ACME crap, why didn't
he just buy dinner?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Understanding why portage wants to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk

2013-07-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 02/07/2013 10:04, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:06:36 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
 dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2
 Why does the atom ~dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2 NOT apply to
 dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r2?
 
 It applies to version 4.2 and all revisions. 4.2.9 is a different version
 
 You need one of
 
 =dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2*
 dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2
 
 


Chris,

You probably already spotted this but just in case

stable sdk is v2.02.0807.1535
stable toolkit is 4.2.9-r2



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Understanding why portage wants to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk

2013-07-02 Thread Chris Stankevitz
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
 You probably already spotted this but just in case

 stable sdk is v2.02.0807.1535
 stable toolkit is 4.2.9-r2


Alan,

I did not notice that.  Thank you, it all makes sense now!

Chris



[gentoo-user] Understanding why portage wants to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk

2013-07-01 Thread Chris Stankevitz
Hello,

I'm particularly paranoid about my CUDA setup.  I do not understand
CUDA except enough to declare that if my machine has CUDA 4.2
installed my life will be easy.  This is because I compile software
that supposedly needs CUDA 4.2.

Can someone please translate the emerge -Dauv snip below into english for me?

My attempted translation: portage is about to uninstall CUDA 4.2 and
replace it with CUDA 2.2 so enjoy your new life of misery sucker...
should've used OpenCL!  Hahaha!

I'll also post the top of dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk/ChangeLog

Thank you,

Chris

===

emerge -Duav snip:

[ebuild UD ] dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-2.02.0807.1535 [4.2]
USE=-debug -emulation% (-cuda%*) (-doc%*) (-examples%*) (-opencl%)
40,937 kB

===

ChangeLog snip:

# ChangeLog for dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
# Copyright 1999-2013 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk/ChangeLog,v
1.40 2013/06/26 16:13:04 xarthisius Exp $

  26 Jun 2013; Kacper Kowalik xarthis...@gentoo.org
  -nvidia-cuda-sdk-2.2-r1.ebuild, -nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r1.ebuild,
  -nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.ebuild, -nvidia-cuda-sdk-5.0.35.ebuild,
  nvidia-cuda-sdk-5.0.35-r1.ebuild:
  Workaround bug #462602, drop old

*nvidia-cuda-sdk-5.0.35-r1 (09 Mar 2013)

  09 Mar 2013; Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org
  +nvidia-cuda-sdk-5.0.35-r1.ebuild:
  Install Makefile with examples, #460740

*nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r2 (23 Jan 2013)



Re: [gentoo-user] Understanding why portage wants to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk

2013-07-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 01/07/2013 23:18, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I'm particularly paranoid about my CUDA setup.  I do not understand
 CUDA except enough to declare that if my machine has CUDA 4.2
 installed my life will be easy.  This is because I compile software
 that supposedly needs CUDA 4.2.
 
 Can someone please translate the emerge -Dauv snip below into english for me?

It says it's going to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk,but it doesn't say why.
For that:

$ eix dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
* dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
 Available versions:  2.02.0807.1535^b (~)4.2.9-r2 (~)5.0.35-r1
{+cuda debug +doc emulation +examples opencl}
 Homepage:http://developer.nvidia.com/cuda
 Description: NVIDIA CUDA Software Development Kit



What's in your ACCEPT_KEYWORDS?
My guess is you have a stable system and cuda is not unmasked





 
 My attempted translation: portage is about to uninstall CUDA 4.2 and
 replace it with CUDA 2.2 so enjoy your new life of misery sucker...
 should've used OpenCL!  Hahaha!
 
 I'll also post the top of dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk/ChangeLog
 
 Thank you,
 
 Chris
 
 ===
 
 emerge -Duav snip:
 
 [ebuild UD ] dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-2.02.0807.1535 [4.2]
 USE=-debug -emulation% (-cuda%*) (-doc%*) (-examples%*) (-opencl%)
 40,937 kB
 
 ===
 
 ChangeLog snip:
 
 # ChangeLog for dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
 # Copyright 1999-2013 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2
 # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk/ChangeLog,v
 1.40 2013/06/26 16:13:04 xarthisius Exp $
 
   26 Jun 2013; Kacper Kowalik xarthis...@gentoo.org
   -nvidia-cuda-sdk-2.2-r1.ebuild, -nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r1.ebuild,
   -nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.ebuild, -nvidia-cuda-sdk-5.0.35.ebuild,
   nvidia-cuda-sdk-5.0.35-r1.ebuild:
   Workaround bug #462602, drop old
 
 *nvidia-cuda-sdk-5.0.35-r1 (09 Mar 2013)
 
   09 Mar 2013; Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org
   +nvidia-cuda-sdk-5.0.35-r1.ebuild:
   Install Makefile with examples, #460740
 
 *nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r2 (23 Jan 2013)
 


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Understanding why portage wants to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk

2013-07-01 Thread Chris Stankevitz
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 01/07/2013 23:18, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
 It says it's going to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk,but it doesn't say why.
 For that:

 $ eix dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
 * dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
  Available versions:  2.02.0807.1535^b (~)4.2.9-r2 (~)5.0.35-r1
 {+cuda debug +doc emulation +examples opencl}
  Homepage:http://developer.nvidia.com/cuda
  Description: NVIDIA CUDA Software Development Kit

Alan,

Thank you for your help.  Based on your suggestion, I confirmed the
reason for the nvidia-cuda-sdk downgrade is that my package.keywords
suddenly no longer applies.

These are questions that still linger in my head:

Why does the atom ~dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2 NOT apply to
dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r2?

Why does the atom ~dev-util/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-4.2 INDEED apply to
dev-util/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/4.2.9-r2 (see below)?

Thanks again,

Chris

===

~ $ eix dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
[D] dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
 Available versions:  2.02.0807.1535^b ~4.2.9-r2 ~5.0.35-r1
{{+cuda debug +doc emulation +examples opencl}}
 Installed versions:  4.2(03:24:15 01/14/13)(cuda doc examples
-debug -opencl)
 Homepage:http://developer.nvidia.com/cuda
 Description: NVIDIA CUDA Software Development Kit

~ $ grep nvidia-cuda-sdk /etc/portage/package.keywords
~dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2 ~amd64

===

~ $ eix dev-util/nvidia-cuda-toolkit
[I] dev-util/nvidia-cuda-toolkit
 Available versions:
(0) 4.2.9-r2 ~5.0.35-r2 ~5.0.35-r3
(0/4.2.9) ~4.2.9-r3
(0/5.0.35) ~5.0.35-r4
{{debugger doc eclipse profiler}}
 Installed versions:  4.2.9-r2(18:33:18 02/08/13)(-debugger -doc
-eclipse -profiler)
 Homepage:http://developer.nvidia.com/cuda
 Description: NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit (compiler and friends)

~ $ grep nvidia-cuda-toolkit /etc/portage/package.keywords
~dev-util/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-4.2 ~amd64