Re: [gentoo-user] What's my architecture ? - was System update problems

2005-09-23 Thread Rumen Yotov
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:23:05 +0100
Rupert Young (Restart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I was having a problem updating my system, but I think I have a more
 fundamental problem. I'm not sure what my architecture is!
 
 Sorry for the dumb question.
 
 uname -a, gives the following
 
 Linux fluffy 2.6.7-gentoo-r14 #1 SMP Wed Aug 18 09:57:23 UTC 2004
 x86_64 AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 250 AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
 
 Does this mean my arch is x86 or amd?
 
Check man uname, specially -i, -m, -o, -p flags (-a does it too).
IMO it's AMD-64-bits, still no experience with such arch.
 For those who have managed to get this far without collapsing in fits
 of hysterics a bit of history,
 
 * Someone installed gentoo about a year ago for me.
 * Last week I wanted to add some apps and as I was finding probs
 decided to do an upadate.
 * I think I did emerge sync first.
 * then tried emerge -uDpv world
 * somewhere I had a problem that make.profile was not linked
 * I did a symbolic link to the amd64 2005.1 dir
 * then had various problems, such as 
 !!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 failed, 
 when doing emerge -uv system
 
 I have now link make.profile to
 /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1
 
 Was this right?
 
 I then did emerge --sync and etc-update on 61 config files.
 
 Now getting the error below on emerge -upv system.
 
 Am I barking up the right tadpole?
 
 !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 have been
 masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to
 complete your request:
 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.3-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.4 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
 
 For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man
 page or section 2.2 Software Availability in the Gentoo Handbook.
 
 
 !!! Problem with ebuild sys-devel/gcc-3.4.1-r1
 !!! Possibly a DEPEND/*DEPEND problem.
 
 !!! Depgraph creation failed.
 
 Regards,
  
 Rupert 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Michael Kintzios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 22 September 2005 14:19
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
  Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] System update problems
  
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rupert Young (Restart)
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 22 September 2005 12:25
   To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
   Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] System update problems
  
  
   Thanks. Unless anyone else has any suggestions I will try it.
  
   Can anyone else confirm this is the way to go before I try?
  
  It depends how patient you are.  The suggested fix will bring your
  machine up to an as new condition.  On the other hand, it might
  unnecessarily rebuilt packages that may not be broken or need
  updating (yet) and will take years to complete (well, it depends on
  how fast your machine is :-)  That said I would think that after a
  whole year there wouldn't be much left in portage, which has not a
  new ebuild?
  
  As an alternative, if your machine is not totally hosed you could
  start from the bottom up rebuilding the core packages and after a
  fresh --sync, update the whole world.  Try re-emerging the gentoo
  toolkit: gcc-config glibc binutils libstdc++.  Run # etc-update and
  # env-update  source /etc/profile as required and rebuild
  portage; do another --sync; and then emerge -upDv world to see what
  comes up in need for an update.
  
  However, if basic compilers, etc. are broken you will not be able to
  re-emerge the toolkit and the solution suggested by Dave remains the
  best option.
  --
  Regards,
  Mick
  
  --
  gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 
 
 
HTH. Rumen


pgpo3Qg7p4jcs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] What's my architecture ? - was System update problems

2005-09-22 Thread Rupert Young (Restart)

I was having a problem updating my system, but I think I have a more
fundamental problem. I'm not sure what my architecture is!

Sorry for the dumb question.

uname -a, gives the following

Linux fluffy 2.6.7-gentoo-r14 #1 SMP Wed Aug 18 09:57:23 UTC 2004 x86_64 AMD
Opteron(tm) Processor 250 AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

Does this mean my arch is x86 or amd?

For those who have managed to get this far without collapsing in fits of
hysterics a bit of history,

* Someone installed gentoo about a year ago for me.
* Last week I wanted to add some apps and as I was finding probs decided to
do an upadate.
* I think I did emerge sync first.
* then tried emerge -uDpv world
* somewhere I had a problem that make.profile was not linked
* I did a symbolic link to the amd64 2005.1 dir
* then had various problems, such as 
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 failed, 
when doing emerge -uv system

I have now link make.profile to
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1

Was this right?

I then did emerge --sync and etc-update on 61 config files.

Now getting the error below on emerge -upv system.

Am I barking up the right tadpole?

!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.3-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.4 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or 
section 2.2 Software Availability in the Gentoo Handbook.


!!! Problem with ebuild sys-devel/gcc-3.4.1-r1
!!! Possibly a DEPEND/*DEPEND problem.

!!! Depgraph creation failed.

Regards,
 
Rupert 

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Kintzios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 22 September 2005 14:19
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] System update problems
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rupert Young (Restart)
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 22 September 2005 12:25
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
  Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] System update problems
 
 
  Thanks. Unless anyone else has any suggestions I will try it.
 
  Can anyone else confirm this is the way to go before I try?
 
 It depends how patient you are.  The suggested fix will bring your
 machine up to an as new condition.  On the other hand, it might
 unnecessarily rebuilt packages that may not be broken or need updating
 (yet) and will take years to complete (well, it depends on how fast your
 machine is :-)  That said I would think that after a whole year there
 wouldn't be much left in portage, which has not a new ebuild?
 
 As an alternative, if your machine is not totally hosed you could start
 from the bottom up rebuilding the core packages and after a fresh
 --sync, update the whole world.  Try re-emerging the gentoo toolkit:
 gcc-config glibc binutils libstdc++.  Run # etc-update and # env-update
  source /etc/profile as required and rebuild portage; do another
 --sync; and then emerge -upDv world to see what comes up in need for an
 update.
 
 However, if basic compilers, etc. are broken you will not be able to
 re-emerge the toolkit and the solution suggested by Dave remains the
 best option.
 --
 Regards,
 Mick
 
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list