Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it didn't. rt-sources is from some overlay, and probably you are using OVERLAY_CACHE_METHOD=none which cannot read SLOT-data calculated in eclasses. You might set (in /etc/eixrc or in ~/.eixrc or in your environment) OVERLAY_CACHE_METHOD=ebuild or OVERLAY_CACHE_METHOD=ebuild* before calling update-eix, but please see first man eix about the risks. Martin -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
Hi, I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing in eix? Why is a package now shown as ~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1 instead of just ~2.6.19-r1 How does this help me, or what isit trying to accomplish? As a user type it sure seems less readable now. Thanks, Mark lightning ~ # eix gentoo-sources * sys-kernel/gentoo-sources Available versions: !2.4.32-r7:2.4.32-r7 2.6.15-r1:2.6.15-r1 2.6.16-r13:2.6.16-r13 2.6.17-r8:2.6.17-r8 ~2.6.17-r9:2.6.17-r9 ~2.6.18:2.6.18 ~2.6.18-r1:2.6.18-r1 2.6.18-r2:2.6.18-r2 2.6.18-r3:2.6.18-r3 2.6.18-r4:2.6.18-r4 ~2.6.19:2.6.19 ~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1 Installed: none Homepage:http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches Description: Full sources including the Gentoo patchset for the 2.6 kernel tree lightning ~ # -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
Mark Knecht wrote: Why is a package now shown as ~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1 instead of just ~2.6.19-r1 It's showing you the SLOT the package is in. *-sources have the version as slot, allowing you to install them in parallel, so in that case it's not very informative. Try eix -e qt, there it makes more sense. Regards, T. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On 12/8/06, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing in eix? Why is a package now shown as ~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1 instead of just ~2.6.19-r1 How does this help me, or what isit trying to accomplish? As a user type it sure seems less readable now. I'm pretty sure that's showing you slots, but I speak under correction. Looks to me like each kernel version has it's own slot, so they wont unmerge older kernels. -- Ryan W Sims -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:21, Mark Knecht wrote: Hi, I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing in eix? Why is a package now shown as ~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1 instead of just ~2.6.19-r1 The second one is the SLOT for that package. Run eix on an unslotted package and you don't get it, such as: [I] dev-libs/eet Available versions: (~)0.9.10.030 !0.9.10.030[1] (*) ![1] Installed versions: (15:14:01 12/08/06)(doc -nls) Homepage:http://www.enlightenment.org/pages/eet.html Description: E file chunk reading/writing library With a SLOTted package, it's useful to know which SLOT the package is in, I also see that your's shows them after a colon, but mine is within parenthesis: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ eix gentoo-sources [I] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources Available versions: (2.4.32-r7) 2.4.32-r7 (2.6.15-r1) 2.6.15-r1 (2.6.16-r13)2.6.16-r13 (2.6.17-r8) 2.6.17-r8 (2.6.17-r9) (~)2.6.17-r9 (2.6.18)(~)2.6.18 (2.6.18-r1) (~)2.6.18-r1 (2.6.18-r2) 2.6.18-r2 (2.6.18-r3) 2.6.18-r3 (2.6.18-r4) (~)2.6.18-r4 (2.6.19)(~)2.6.19 (2.6.19-r1) (~)2.6.19-r1 Installed versions: 2.6.18-r3(2.6.18-r3)(19:14:22 12/06/06) (-build -symlink -ultra1) 2.6.19-r1(2.6.19-r1)(14:21:04 12/06/06) (-build -symlink) Homepage:http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches Description: Full sources including the Gentoo patchset for the 2.6 kernel tree alan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 December 2006 17:21, Mark Knecht wrote: Hi, I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing in eix? Why is a package now shown as ~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1 instead of just ~2.6.19-r1 The second one is the SLOT for that package. Run eix on an unslotted package and you don't get it, such as: [I] dev-libs/eet Available versions: (~)0.9.10.030 !0.9.10.030[1] (*) ![1] Installed versions: (15:14:01 12/08/06)(doc -nls) Homepage:http://www.enlightenment.org/pages/eet.html Description: E file chunk reading/writing library With a SLOTted package, it's useful to know which SLOT the package is in, I also see that your's shows them after a colon, but mine is within parenthesis: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ eix gentoo-sources [I] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources Available versions: (2.4.32-r7) 2.4.32-r7 (2.6.15-r1) 2.6.15-r1 [snip] That's interesting. Are you running a ~ version of eix, or is that a format you set up? My systems uses the colon as well. -- Ryan W Sims -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is happening. Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output is far more readable. Thanks, Mark On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 December 2006 17:21, Mark Knecht wrote: Hi, I've been meaning to ask - what's with the new double name thing in eix? Why is a package now shown as ~2.6.19-r1:2.6.19-r1 instead of just ~2.6.19-r1 The second one is the SLOT for that package. Run eix on an unslotted package and you don't get it, such as: [I] dev-libs/eet Available versions: (~)0.9.10.030 !0.9.10.030[1] (*) ![1] Installed versions: (15:14:01 12/08/06)(doc -nls) Homepage:http://www.enlightenment.org/pages/eet.html Description: E file chunk reading/writing library With a SLOTted package, it's useful to know which SLOT the package is in, I also see that your's shows them after a colon, but mine is within parenthesis: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ eix gentoo-sources [I] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources Available versions: (2.4.32-r7) 2.4.32-r7 (2.6.15-r1) 2.6.15-r1 (2.6.16-r13)2.6.16-r13 (2.6.17-r8) 2.6.17-r8 (2.6.17-r9) (~)2.6.17-r9 (2.6.18)(~)2.6.18 (2.6.18-r1) (~)2.6.18-r1 (2.6.18-r2) 2.6.18-r2 (2.6.18-r3) 2.6.18-r3 (2.6.18-r4) (~)2.6.18-r4 (2.6.19)(~)2.6.19 (2.6.19-r1) (~)2.6.19-r1 Installed versions: 2.6.18-r3(2.6.18-r3)(19:14:22 12/06/06) (-build -symlink -ultra1) 2.6.19-r1(2.6.19-r1)(14:21:04 12/06/06) (-build -symlink) Homepage:http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches Description: Full sources including the Gentoo patchset for the 2.6 kernel tree alan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On Friday 08 December 2006 18:20, Mark Knecht wrote: Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is happening. Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output is far more readable. Nope, it's a default setup, but probaly an outdated default (see other mail). I'd post the eixrc here, but it's 27k. I can send you a copy direct if you want to plough through it and see why mine is different alan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 December 2006 18:20, Mark Knecht wrote: Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is happening. Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output is far more readable. Nope, it's a default setup, but probaly an outdated default (see other mail). I'd post the eixrc here, but it's 27k. I can send you a copy direct if you want to plough through it and see why mine is different alan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list 27K? Mine is one line which is commented out!!! #PORTDIR_CACHE_METHOD='cdb' I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through it. Thanks, Mark -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On Friday 08 December 2006 19:16, Mark Knecht wrote:
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 18:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
Thanks all for answering. Now it's much clearer why this is
happening.
Alan - do you use some sort of extra config for eix? Your output
is far more readable.
Nope, it's a default setup, but probaly an outdated default (see
other mail). I'd post the eixrc here, but it's 27k.
I can send you a copy direct if you want to plough through it and
see why mine is different
alan
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
27K? Mine is one line which is commented out!!!
#PORTDIR_CACHE_METHOD='cdb'
I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't
mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through it.
Thanks,
Mark
# BOOLEAN
# Whether --quick is on by default.
QUICKMODE='false'
# BOOLEAN
# Whether --care is on.
CAREMODE='false'
# BOOLEAN
# Whether --quiet is on by default.
QUIETMODE='false'
# BOOLEAN
# If true, diff-eix will only consider version changes for installed packages.
DIFF_ONLY_INSTALLED='false'
# BOOLEAN
# If true, diff-eix will not consider slots for version changes.
DIFF_NO_SLOTS='false'
# STRING
# Defines whether --compact or --verbose is on by default.
DEFAULT_FORMAT='normal'
# BOOLEAN
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines whether all information lines are printed (even if empty).
PRINT_ALWAYS='false'
# BOOLEAN
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines whether diff-eix will output installed versions.
DIFF_PRINT_INSTALLED='true'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for the title texts.
COLOR_TITLE='green'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing the name of packages.
COLOR_NAME='default,1'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing the category of packages.
COLOR_CATEGORY=''
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing the category of system packages.
COLOR_CATEGORY_SYSTEM='yellow'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing upgrade recommendation texts.
COLOR_UPGRADE_TEXT='cyan,1'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing downgrade recommendation texts.
COLOR_DOWNGRADE_TEXT='purple,1'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing upgrade recommendation tags.
COLOR_UPGRADE='%{COLOR_UPGRADE_TEXT};inverse'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing downgrade recommendation tags.
COLOR_DOWNGRADE='%{COLOR_DOWNGRADE_TEXT};inverse'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for better version tags (diff-eix).
DIFF_COLOR_BETTER='yellow,1'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for worse version tags (diff-eix).
DIFF_COLOR_WORSE='red,1'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for new package tags (diff-eix).
DIFF_COLOR_NEW_TAG='%{DIFF_COLOR_NEW}'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for new package separators (diff-eix).
DIFF_COLOR_NEW='%{COLOR_TITLE},1'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for deleted package separators (diff-eix).
DIFF_COLOR_DELETE='red,1'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for changed package separators (diff-eix).
DIFF_COLOR_CHANGED='yellow'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for tagging installed packages.
COLOR_INST_TAG='%{COLOR_TITLE},1;inverse'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for tagging uninstalled packages.
COLOR_UNINST_TAG='%{COLOR_TITLE}'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing the date.
COLOR_DATE='purple'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing the set useflags.
COLOR_SET_USE='red,1'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing the unset useflags.
COLOR_UNSET_USE='black,1'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for printing the version of installed packages.
COLOR_INST_VERSION='blue,1;%{MARK_INSTALLED}'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the color used for the title texts for installed versions.
COLOR_INST_TITLE='blue'
# STRING
# This variable is used for delayed substitution.
# It defines the
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through it. Which version of eix are you using? The output has changed a lot between 0.6.4 (the latest stable) and 0.8.2. I'm using 0.8.2 with the default config and get the same output as Alan. -- Neil Bothwick Power corrupts - absolute power is even more fun. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On 12/8/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through it. Which version of eix are you using? The output has changed a lot between 0.6.4 (the latest stable) and 0.8.2. I'm using 0.8.2 with the default config and get the same output as Alan. I'm on 0.6.4 Neil. Thanks. I'll try the testing version. Cheers, Mark -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On 12/8/06, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/8/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: I re-emerged eix and it doesn't install eixrc at all. If you wouldn't mind please do send it along off list. I'd like to look through it. Which version of eix are you using? The output has changed a lot between 0.6.4 (the latest stable) and 0.8.2. I'm using 0.8.2 with the default config and get the same output as Alan. I'm on 0.6.4 Neil. Thanks. I'll try the testing version. Cheers, Mark Neil, The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it didn't. Any reason for wanting them to look different or is this a bug that should be reported to someone? I guess the 'slot' for rt-sources is '~' and maybe eix doesn't know what to do with that? Thanks, Mark lightning linux # eix gentoo-sources * sys-kernel/gentoo-sources Available versions: (2.4.32-r7) !2.4.32-r7 (2.6.15-r1) 2.6.15-r1 (2.6.16-r13)2.6.16-r13 (2.6.17-r8) 2.6.17-r8 (2.6.17-r9) ~2.6.17-r9 (2.6.18)~2.6.18 (2.6.18-r1) ~2.6.18-r1 (2.6.18-r2) 2.6.18-r2 (2.6.18-r3) 2.6.18-r3 (2.6.18-r4) 2.6.18-r4 (2.6.19)~2.6.19 (2.6.19-r1) ~2.6.19-r1 Homepage:http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches Description: Full sources including the Gentoo patchset for the 2.6 kernel tree lightning linux # eix rt-sources [UD] sys-kernel/rt-sources [1] Available versions: (~)2.6.15-r21 2.6.16-r29 (~)2.6.17_rc6-r5 (~)2.6.17-r5 (~)2.6.17-r7 *2.6.17-r8 (~)2.6.18-r5 (~)2.6.18-r6 (~)2.6.18-r7 (~)2.6.19_rc6-r9 (~)2.6.19-r1 (~)2.6.19-r3 (~)2.6.19-r6 (~)2.6.19-r7 Installed versions: 2.6.16-r16(2.6.16-r16)(12:37:27 PM 05/21/2006)(-build -doc -symlink) 2.6.18-r7(07:14:54 AM 10/23/2006)(-build -fbsplash -realtime-lsm -symlink -vesafb-tng) 2.6.19-r7(01:51:54 PM 12/07/2006)(-build -fbsplash -symlink -vesafb-tng) Description: Ingo Molnars realtime patch applied on vanilla [1] /usr/portage/local/layman/pro-audio lightning linux # -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:30:51 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it didn't. Any reason for wanting them to look different or is this a bug that should be reported to someone? I guess the 'slot' for rt-sources is '~' and maybe eix doesn't know what to do with that? The ~ means it is a testing ebuild. At a guess (I don't use either of those overlays) I'd say rt-sources isn't slotted. that's what the eix output indicates. -- Neil Bothwick Midget psychic escapes from prison, small medium at large! signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] eix double naming with colon?
On 12/8/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:30:51 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it didn't. Any reason for wanting them to look different or is this a bug that should be reported to someone? I guess the 'slot' for rt-sources is '~' and maybe eix doesn't know what to do with that? The ~ means it is a testing ebuild. At a guess (I don't use either of those overlays) I'd say rt-sources isn't slotted. that's what the eix output indicates. OK. Thanks. I'll point that out to the proaudio overlay folks and maybe they'll fix it up to look nicer. thanks for your help. Cheers, Mark -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
