Re: [gentoo-user] gccmakedep
JimD wrote: On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:32:27 -0600 Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JimD wrote: Thanks. I wonder why TightVNC is so broken on xorg 7.0? Help the devs and submit a bug report (if its not submitted already) ;) I beat you to the punch : ) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128456 Jim Apologies for not looking into it deeper before. Fine the ebuild is; this is a common Portage problem. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112896 for more information. Those are the dependencies needed to build TightVNC. 1 DEPEND=|| ( ( x11-libs/libXaw 2 x11-proto/xextproto 3 =x11-misc/imake-1 4 x11-misc/gccmakedep 5 app-text/rman 6 server? ( x11-libs/libXp 7 x11-proto/inputproto 8 x11-proto/kbproto 9 x11-proto/printproto 10 x11-proto/scrnsaverproto 11 ) 13 ) 14 virtual/x11 15 ) 16 ~media-libs/jpeg-6b 17 sys-libs/zlib 18 tcpd? ( =sys-apps/tcp-wrappers-7.6-r2 ) 19 !net-misc/vnc See in Line 1 the || ? That tells portage that to build TightVNC: 1). We need either the packages: x11-libs/libXaw =x11-misc/imake-1 (imake version 1 or greater) x11-misc/gccmakedep app-text/rman and if the 'server' USE flag is set: x11-libs/libXp ... so on ... x11-proto/scrnsaverproto. 2). OR, OR, OR, OR!!, OR: virtual/x11 If you look in /usr/portage/virtual/x11, there are currently two ebuilds in that directory: x11-6.8 and x11-7.0 x11-6.8 depends on =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.99, and x11-7.0 depends on all these: =x11-base/xorg-x11-7 x11-apps/xdm x11-apps/xdpyinfo x11-apps/xrdb x11-apps/xsetroot x11-libs/libFS x11-libs/liboldX x11-libs/libXevie x11-libs/libXprintAppUtil x11-libs/libXTrap x11-libs/libXvMC x11-themes/gentoo-xcursors x11-themes/xcursor-themes Chances are that if you've been a long xorg 7.0 user: 1). You had to type 'virtual/x11' in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided to stop Portage from blocking your emerge -uDN world with those annoying 'blocks' because something was preventing it from downgrading Xorg to the old 6.8.2 or 6.99. 2). You somehow ended up with virtual/x11 emerged in your system. Well, that's it. Portage sees in the ebuild that virtual/x11 is listed as a dependency, so are all the packages in virtual/x11. As soon as it sees it, it forgets about gccmakedep and those other dudes and keeps going and ends upu failing. But even if you had installed Xorg 7.0 by emerging virtual/x11-7.0, notice that gccmakedep isn't there, imake isn't there, and rman isn't there, so you would've ended up with the same thing. I checked virtual/x11-7.0 by doing `emerge -ep =virtual/x11-7.0 | grep gccmakedep` and got nothing. Same result for xorg-x11-7.0-r1 Well, heh. If there's an error somewhere, I'm sure someone will point it out. Just sharing, just sharing. -Luis -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] gccmakedep
Does anyone know the path to this file? I am trying to compile net-misc/tightvnc and have run in to several issues. I am trying to get it to compile on xorg 7.0. If I get it to compile I will submit a bug report. I cannot use the standard net-misc/vnc because it wants to merge an older version of xorg. I an trying to run x11-misc/vnc2swf to make a demo. However I cannot get it to with net-misc/vino or x11-misc/x11vnc. When I connect to local host, both of those apps go nuts and start a mirror effect. So it looks like I need to run a separate xvncserver to do the vnc recording. Jim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- I'm a geek, but I don't get it. 36-24-36 = -24. What's the significance? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Florida, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gccmakedep
Jim wrote: Does anyone know the path to this file? I am trying to compile % which gccmakedep /usr/bin/gccmakedep Is that what you were asking? -Jeremy -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gccmakedep
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:54:56 -0600 Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim wrote: Does anyone know the path to this file? I am trying to compile % which gccmakedep /usr/bin/gccmakedep Is that what you were asking? Opps, I meant what ebuild it belongs too : ) Jim -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gccmakedep
JimD wrote: -- cut cut cut -- Opps, I meant what ebuild it belongs too : ) Jim x11-misc/gccmakedep You might also need to emerge app-text/rman I emerged TightVNC about two days ago. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gccmakedep
JimD wrote: -- cut cut cut -- Opps, I meant what ebuild it belongs too : ) Jim Also, check http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127001 if it Xvnc (run by the script vncserver) refuses to run. -Luis -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gccmakedep
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 17:23:46 -0800 Luis Ortiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: x11-misc/gccmakedep You might also need to emerge app-text/rman I emerged TightVNC about two days ago. Thanks. I wonder why TightVNC is so broken on xorg 7.0? Jim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- I'm a geek, but I don't get it. 36-24-36 = -24. What's the significance? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Florida, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gccmakedep
Jim wrote: -- cut cut cut -- Thanks. I wonder why TightVNC is so broken on xorg 7.0? The maintainer of the ebuild just needs to add imake, gccmakedep and rman as dependencies. Other than that, it's the developer's responsibility to adapt TightVNC for any dream, nightmare, or anonyance that Xorg 7.0 might have brought. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gccmakedep
JimD wrote: Thanks. I wonder why TightVNC is so broken on xorg 7.0? Help the devs and submit a bug report (if its not submitted already) ;) -Jeremy -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gccmakedep
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:32:27 -0600 Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JimD wrote: Thanks. I wonder why TightVNC is so broken on xorg 7.0? Help the devs and submit a bug report (if its not submitted already) ;) I beat you to the punch : ) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128456 Jim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- I'm a geek, but I don't get it. 36-24-36 = -24. What's the significance? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Florida, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
