Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable

2012-12-28 Thread Bruce Hill
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:38:38PM -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:34:00PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
  
  Looking at the package list:
  http://packages.gentoo.org/package/gnome-base/gconf?arches=fbsd
  
  gnome-base/gconf is not mark stable or testing at all, there is a blank 
  space.
  gconf-2.32.4 was already installed on my system, emerge is trying to 
  rebuild it only, but since it is not available it fails. 
  
  -- 
  Joseph
 
 mingdao@workstation ~ $ eshowkw gnome-base/gconf
 Keywords for gnome-base/gconf:
   |   | u   |  
   | a a p s   | n   |  
   | l m   h i m m   p s   p   | u s | r
   | p d a p a 6 i p c 3   a x | s l | e
   | h 6 r p 6 8 p p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p
   | a 4 m a 4 k s c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o
 --+---+-+---
 [I]2.32.4 | + + + o + o ~ + + o + + + | o 2 | gentoo
 3.2.5 | ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ | o   | gentoo

Sorry for replying to my own; must have deleted OP.

This morning's world update only wanted to rebuild gconf because they made the
gtk dep optional and dropped the doc USE:

[ebuild   R] gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4:2  USE=gtk%* introspection -debug 
-ldap -policykit (-doc%) 0 kB

It was still listed the same by eshowkw in portage, after eix-sync; and it
built with no problems here.

Are you still having a problem with this?
-- 
Happy Penguin Computers   ')
126 Fenco Drive   ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801   ^^
supp...@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/

Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting



Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable

2012-12-28 Thread Mark Knecht
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Bruce Hill
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
SNIP
 Sorry for replying to my own; must have deleted OP.

 This morning's world update only wanted to rebuild gconf because they made the
 gtk dep optional and dropped the doc USE:

 [ebuild   R] gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4:2  USE=gtk%* introspection -debug 
 -ldap -policykit (-doc%) 0 kB

 It was still listed the same by eshowkw in portage, after eix-sync; and it
 built with no problems here.

 Are you still having a problem with this?


It's fine here also. I expect the OP will be fine also.

Like I said yesterday, bugs happen. Wait a day. They get fixed.

This sandbox violation seems to show up maybe once a year? Don't know
why but it gets fixed fast.

Cheers,
Mark



[gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable

2012-12-27 Thread Joseph

trying to emerge: gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
and I'm getting a strange error: 


Failed to emerge gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4, Log file:
 '/var/log/portage/gnome-base:gconf-2.32.4:20121228-021346.log'
Jobs: 2 of 23 complete, 1 failedLoad avg: 1.05, 0.61, 0.41

 * Package:gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
 * Repository: gentoo
 * Maintainer: gn...@gentoo.org
 * USE:amd64 elibc_glibc gtk introspection kernel_linux ldap policykit 
userland_GNU
 * FEATURES:   sandbox
ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:  /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
ACCESS DENIED  unlink:   /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability

(gconftool-2:24669): GConf-WARNING **: None of the resolved addresses are 
writable; saving configuration settings will not be possible
 * Fixing OMF Makefiles ...
 [ ok ]
 * Disabling deprecation warnings ...
 [ ok ]
 * Running elibtoolize in: GConf-2.32.4/
 *   Applying portage/1.2.0 patch ...
 *   Applying sed/1.5.6 patch ...
 *   Applying as-needed/2.2.6 patch ...
 * Applying gconf-2.24.0-no-gconfd.patch ...
 [ ok ]
 * Applying gconf-2.28.0-entry-set-value-sigsegv.patch ...
 [ ok ]
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY ---
LOG FILE /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-24640.log

VERSION 1.0
FORMAT: F - Function called
FORMAT: S - Access Status
FORMAT: P - Path as passed to function
FORMAT: A - Absolute Path (not canonical)
FORMAT: R - Canonical Path
FORMAT: C - Command Line

F: open_wr
S: deny
P: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
A: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
R: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
C: /usr/bin/gconftool-2 --shutdown 


F: unlink
S: deny
P: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
A: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
R: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
C: /usr/bin/gconftool-2 --shutdown

--
Joseph



Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable

2012-12-27 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
 trying to emerge: gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
 and I'm getting a strange error:
SNIP

 --
 Joseph

Saw the same thing here this morning, and have seen it a couple of
times in the past. My strategy is to sync tomorrow and try again or
mask the package if you need to move forward tonight. (California
time, 6:21PM as I write this)



Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable

2012-12-27 Thread Joseph

On 12/27/12 18:21, Mark Knecht wrote:

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:

trying to emerge: gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
and I'm getting a strange error:

SNIP


--
Joseph


Saw the same thing here this morning, and have seen it a couple of
times in the past. My strategy is to sync tomorrow and try again or
mask the package if you need to move forward tonight. (California
time, 6:21PM as I write this)



Looking at the package list:
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/gnome-base/gconf?arches=fbsd

gnome-base/gconf is not mark stable or testing at all, there is a blank space.
gconf-2.32.4 was already installed on my system, emerge is trying to rebuild it only, but since it is not available it fails. 


--
Joseph



Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable

2012-12-27 Thread Joseph

On 12/27/12 18:21, Mark Knecht wrote:

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:

trying to emerge: gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
and I'm getting a strange error:

SNIP


--
Joseph


Saw the same thing here this morning, and have seen it a couple of
times in the past. My strategy is to sync tomorrow and try again or
mask the package if you need to move forward tonight. (California
time, 6:21PM as I write this)


It is a bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448952

--
Joseph



Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable

2012-12-27 Thread Mark Knecht
Yeah, bugs happen. Like I said, wait a day and try again.



Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable

2012-12-27 Thread Bruce Hill
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:34:00PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
 
 Looking at the package list:
 http://packages.gentoo.org/package/gnome-base/gconf?arches=fbsd
 
 gnome-base/gconf is not mark stable or testing at all, there is a blank space.
 gconf-2.32.4 was already installed on my system, emerge is trying to rebuild 
 it only, but since it is not available it fails. 
 
 -- 
 Joseph

mingdao@workstation ~ $ eshowkw gnome-base/gconf
Keywords for gnome-base/gconf:
  |   | u   |  
  | a a p s   | n   |  
  | l m   h i m m   p s   p   | u s | r
  | p d a p a 6 i p c 3   a x | s l | e
  | h 6 r p 6 8 p p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p
  | a 4 m a 4 k s c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o
--+---+-+---
[I]2.32.4 | + + + o + o ~ + + o + + + | o 2 | gentoo
3.2.5 | ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ | o   | gentoo
-- 
Happy Penguin Computers   ')
126 Fenco Drive   ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801   ^^
supp...@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/

Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting