Re: [gentoo-user] rc-status and broken links
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:34:01 -0600, Peter Kelly wrote: I only see the [broken] message when I use `rc-status -s`. If I just type 'rc-status', I get a correct response for the default runlevel. There's a bug files here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113755 I see the same now, I was thinking of rc-update (I'd automatically corrected your typo :) but rc-status -s shows everything as broken, when it isn't. -- Neil Bothwick I'm Pink, Therefore I'm Spam signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] rc-status and broken links
On Monday 03 April 2006 04:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:34:01 -0600, Peter Kelly wrote: I only see the [broken] message when I use `rc-status -s`. If I just type 'rc-status', I get a correct response for the default runlevel. There's a bug files here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113755 I see the same now, I was thinking of rc-update (I'd automatically corrected your typo :) but rc-status -s shows everything as broken, when it isn't. On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:30:20 +0200, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:34:01 -0600, Peter Kelly wrote: I only see the [broken] message when I use `rc-status -s`. If I just type 'rc-status', I get a correct response for the default runlevel. There's a bug files here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113755 I see the same now, I was thinking of rc-update (I'd automatically corrected your typo :) but rc-status -s shows everything as broken, when it isn't. Thanks. I've updated the bug, and added another with a reference, since I couldn't figure out how to re-open 113755. Now, will this post using Agent and Wine? If it double posts, I apologize. Peter -- I only hope to read this in the future - Peter Kelly -- I read the newspaper avidly. It is my one form of continuous fiction. -- Aneurin Bevan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] rc-status and broken links
On Saturday 01 April 2006 19:22, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Peter Kelly wrote: Now, it shows that every service is [broken], but the advice to remove the broken service using rc-update -d (service) and add it in again does nothing. Everything is still [broken]. Anyone seen this, and have an idea how to fix it? Hmm, I had this happen once to me before...every single link in /etc/runlevels was broken. System still booted though? System boots fine. I'm still finding a couple issues after the deaths of the hard drive and motherboard, but pretty minor stuff, like this. After re-reading your post are you saying the sym links are broken in /etc/runlevels or just in the output of rc-status? I only see the [broken] message when I use `rc-status -s`. If I just type 'rc-status', I get a correct response for the default runlevel. The only reason I even know this is a problem is because of a typo. I meant to run rc-update -s, and typed rc-status -s by mistake. But now that I *know* there is an issue, I really want to fix it. Thanks. Peter -- There *__is* no such thing as a civil engineer. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] rc-status and broken links
Peter Kelly wrote: Now, it shows that every service is [broken], but the advice to remove the broken service using rc-update -d (service) and add it in again does nothing. Everything is still [broken]. Anyone seen this, and have an idea how to fix it? Hmm, I had this happen once to me before...every single link in /etc/runlevels was broken. System still booted though? After re-reading your post are you saying the sym links are broken in /etc/runlevels or just in the output of rc-status? I manually fixed every sym link by hand because I had no idea what was wrong...Now that I have more experience I still don't know how to fix it because it hasn't happened again.. ?? Good luck, Jeremy -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] rc-status and broken links
Hola! After a recent rebuild starting with a failed hard drive, I think I've got everything nailed down... except root ~ $ rc-status -s default Runlevel: all alsasound [ broken ] apmd[ broken ] ... xdm [ broken ] xfs [ broken ] * You have some broken symbolic links as reported by the broken * status above. This can be fixed by removing the broken service * from its runlevel and re-adding it back using rc-update. Now, it shows that every service is [broken], but the advice to remove the broken service using rc-update -d (service) and add it in again does nothing. Everything is still [broken]. Anyone seen this, and have an idea how to fix it? Thanks. Peter -- Conformity is the refuge of the unimaginative. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
