Re: [gentoo-user] Google Talk and 9999 versions

2011-11-29 Thread Dale

Michael Mol wrote:

on my partial ~amd64 system, I have googletalk-plugin installed, and
it serves me well. On my new box (also partial ~amd64, but far more in
the stable realm than unstable realm), I tried to emerge
googletalk-plugin, and it's masked. It's also a '' version
package. I vaguely recall that '' packages are special somehow.
How is that?




I think those are called the live builds.  Basically, they are not 
tested much and are really close to falling off the bleeding edge.  I 
rarely mess with those.  There is a google-talkplugin-2.5.6.0 that is 
not live but keyworded.  If it was me, I would at least try that version 
first.  It is likely tested a bit more, not going to change so often and 
be stable as it gets in the unstable branch of the tree.  If that fails, 
go back to the older version.  If neither works, then I would try to 
 build.  I'd also cross my fingers for good measure.


Dale

:-)  :-)

--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how 
you interpreted my words!




Re: [gentoo-user] Google Talk and 9999 versions

2011-11-29 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 29 Nov 2011 14:26:17 Dale wrote:
 Michael Mol wrote:
  on my partial ~amd64 system, I have googletalk-plugin installed, and
  it serves me well. On my new box (also partial ~amd64, but far more in
  the stable realm than unstable realm), I tried to emerge
  googletalk-plugin, and it's masked. It's also a '' version
  package. I vaguely recall that '' packages are special somehow.
  How is that?
 
 I think those are called the live builds.  Basically, they are not
 tested much and are really close to falling off the bleeding edge.  I
 rarely mess with those.  There is a google-talkplugin-2.5.6.0 that is
 not live but keyworded.  If it was me, I would at least try that version
 first.  It is likely tested a bit more, not going to change so often and
 be stable as it gets in the unstable branch of the tree.  If that fails,
 go back to the older version.  If neither works, then I would try to
  build.  I'd also cross my fingers for good measure.

 builds is the latest potentially unstable and incomplete code that the 
devs just churned out and uploaded to cvs.  10 minutes later may be another 
revision  and so on.  Every time you rebuild you'll be downloading the latest 
attempt of their coding.

What is annoying is that you had it working just right and suddenly all the 
 builds have come off the boil and break in a bad way.  This can be 
particularly burdensome or even debilitating for a prolonged period, like I 
experienced with some wireless drivers in the past.

Of course, not all  packages are that 'unstable'.  I've been running e17 
for some time now and only every once in a while I happen to come across a bug 
or build problem.  Even so, I tend not to update  packages often, once I 
get a well behaving revision.

YMMV

-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.