Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nvidia 295.59 driver on kernel 3.3.8
On 2012-06-24 23:57, walt wrote: On 06/24/2012 12:13 PM, Samuraiii wrote: The driver 295.59 builds just fine against kernel 3.2.12 So problem _MUST_ be somewhere around kernel. A perfectly reasonable conclusion. (My own perfectly reasonable conclusions are often wrong ;) Maybe you could install vanilla-sources and see if you have the same problem. Or, just remove the gentoo-sources and reinstall from scratch? OK I'll try vanilla... By reinstall from scratch you mean to unmerge just gentoo-sources or reinstall whole system? -- Samuraiii e-mail: samurai.no.d...@gmail.com mailto:samurai.no.d...@gmail.com GnuPG key ID: 0x80C752EA http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x80C752EAop=vindexfingerprint=onexact=on (obtainable on http://pgp.mit.edu) Full copy of public timestamp block http://publictimestamp.org signatures id-15123 (from 2012-06-24 18:00:09) is included in header of html. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nvidia 295.59 driver on kernel 3.3.8
On 2012-06-24 23:57, walt wrote: On 06/24/2012 12:13 PM, Samuraiii wrote: The driver 295.59 builds just fine against kernel 3.2.12 So problem _MUST_ be somewhere around kernel. A perfectly reasonable conclusion. (My own perfectly reasonable conclusions are often wrong ;) Maybe you could install vanilla-sources and see if you have the same problem. Or, just remove the gentoo-sources and reinstall from scratch? So with vanilla is the same problem, removing gentoo-sources (complete removal - I kept just .config file) also didn't helped. S -- Samuraiii e-mail: samurai.no.d...@gmail.com GnuPG key ID: 0x80C752EA (obtainable on http://pgp.mit.edu) Full copy of public timestamp block signatures id-15131 (from 2012-06-25 18:00:07) is included in header of html. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nvidia 295.59 driver on kernel 3.3.8
On 2012-06-25 23:28, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 25/06/12 22:28, Samuraiii wrote: So with vanilla is the same problem, removing gentoo-sources (complete removal - I kept just .config file) also didn't helped. I guess it's time to open a bug about it on bugs.gentoo.org. The bug for gentoo is unnecessary - bug is sitting on my chair... The problem was combination of umask setting in /etc/profile (umask 077) later corrected to 022 but not sourced to root and "user*" features in /etc/make.conf. I feel so embarassed. Thank you all for your help S -- Samuraiii e-mail: samurai.no.d...@gmail.com GnuPG key ID: 0x80C752EA (obtainable on http://pgp.mit.edu) Full copy of public timestamp block signatures id-15131 (from 2012-06-25 18:00:07) is included in header of html. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nvidia 295.59 driver on kernel 3.3.8
On Monday 25 June 2012 22:38:54 Samuraiii wrote: The bug for gentoo is unnecessary - bug is sitting on my chair... Nice one! It's good to see inventive minds at work. -- Rgds Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nvidia 295.59 driver on kernel 3.3.8
Nikos Chantziaras writes: On 24/06/12 13:49, Samuraiii wrote: Hello, yesterday I run emerge and run into problem with Nvidia 295.59 driver on kernel 3.3.8. It won't compile (also broadcom-sta driver won't rebuild) [...] Linux-3.2.12-gentoo-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Duo_CPU_T8300_@_2.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.1 You're running 3.2.12. Your active kernel source is 3.3.8. This cannot work. Why not? Either use 3.2.12 as your active source, or build a 3.3.8 kernel. He has built 3.3.8 already, he is just not using it yet. Wonko
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nvidia 295.59 driver on kernel 3.3.8
On 2012-06-24 17:13, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 24/06/12 17:58, Alex Schuster wrote: Nikos Chantziaras writes: On 24/06/12 13:49, Samuraiii wrote: Hello, yesterday I run emerge and run into problem with Nvidia 295.59 driver on kernel 3.3.8. It won't compile (also broadcom-sta driver won't rebuild) [...] Linux-3.2.12-gentoo-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Duo_CPU_T8300_@_2.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.1 You're running 3.2.12. Your active kernel source is 3.3.8. This cannot work. Why not? Either use 3.2.12 as your active source, or build a 3.3.8 kernel. He has built 3.3.8 already, he is just not using it yet. If it's built, then it should work. The OP didn't mention it, so I assumed 3.3.8 was not built :-/ In that case, trying the latest driver (302.17) is the best option. Exactly I've built 3.3.8 (and waiting to get all modules ready before I boot it) and with 302.17 is the same problem - no built because of 'Unable to determine...' problem (already tested this option). -- Samuraiii e-mail: samurai.no.d...@gmail.com mailto:samurai.no.d...@gmail.com GnuPG key ID: 0x80C752EA http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x80C752EAop=vindexfingerprint=onexact=on (obtainable on http://pgp.mit.edu) Full copy of public timestamp block http://publictimestamp.org signatures id-15122 (from 2012-06-24 15:00:08) is included in header of html. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
