Re: [gentoo-user] askterisk 11.25.3-r1 masked
On Sunday, 6 December 2020 22:16:04 GMT Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Am December 6, 2020 10:08:45 PM UTC schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > >On 12/06/2020 03:00 PM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > >> Am December 6, 2020 9:23:07 PM UTC schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > >>> I'm looking at the output of "equery y asterisk" > >>> and it shows asterisk-11.25.3-r1 is masked > >>> and https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/net-misc/asterisk show as > >>> stable (amd64) > >>> > >>> Why is it masked on my system? > >> > >> It is masked on every system! As the mask says users should upgrade > > > >to newer versions! > > > >> I guess https://packages.gentoo.org does not consider packages masked > > > >by profiles. You can give your feedback about it here: > >https://packages.gentoo.org/about/feedback > > > >Upgrade is not a problem, re-writing / debugging the extconfig.conf > >(dial plan) is; it takes time. > > Which comes with every software update, you always have to adapt. > This however was not your question! In cases like this it's a good idea to sync portage to fetch the latest tree status and then check the state of all available and masked versions of a package; e.g.: $ eshowkw net-misc/asterisk Keywords for net-misc/asterisk: | | u | | a a p s a r | n | | m r h p p s l i i m m | e u s | r | d a m p p c a x 3 p a s 6 i | a s l | e | 6 r 6 p p 6 r 8 9 h 6 c 8 p | p e o | p | 4 m 4 a c 4 c 6 0 a 4 v k s | i d t | o --+-+---+--- [M]11.25.3-r1 | + o o o o o o + o o o o o o | 6 # 0 | gentoo 13.34.0| + ~ ~ o ~ ~ o + o o o o o o | 7 # | gentoo 13.35.0| ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o o o o o o | 7 # | gentoo 13.36.0| + ~ ~ o ~ ~ o + o o o o o o | 7 o | gentoo 13.37.0| ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o o o o o o | 7 # | gentoo 16.12.0-r1 | ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o o o o o o | 7 # | gentoo 16.13.0| ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o o o o o o | 7 # | gentoo 16.14.0| ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o o o o o o | 7 o | gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] askterisk 11.25.3-r1 masked
Am December 6, 2020 10:08:45 PM UTC schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: >On 12/06/2020 03:00 PM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: >> Am December 6, 2020 9:23:07 PM UTC schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: >>> I'm looking at the output of "equery y asterisk" >>> and it shows asterisk-11.25.3-r1 is masked >>> and https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/net-misc/asterisk show as >>> stable (amd64) >>> >>> Why is it masked on my system? >> >> It is masked on every system! As the mask says users should upgrade >to newer versions! >> >> I guess https://packages.gentoo.org does not consider packages masked >by profiles. You can give your feedback about it here: >https://packages.gentoo.org/about/feedback > >Upgrade is not a problem, re-writing / debugging the extconfig.conf >(dial plan) is; it takes time. Which comes with every software update, you always have to adapt. This however was not your question! -- Best regards Daniel
Re: [gentoo-user] askterisk 11.25.3-r1 masked
On 12/06/2020 03:00 PM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Am December 6, 2020 9:23:07 PM UTC schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: >> I'm looking at the output of "equery y asterisk" >> and it shows asterisk-11.25.3-r1 is masked >> and https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/net-misc/asterisk show as >> stable (amd64) >> >> Why is it masked on my system? > > It is masked on every system! As the mask says users should upgrade to newer > versions! > > I guess https://packages.gentoo.org does not consider packages masked by > profiles. You can give your feedback about it here: > https://packages.gentoo.org/about/feedback Upgrade is not a problem, re-writing / debugging the extconfig.conf (dial plan) is; it takes time.
Re: [gentoo-user] askterisk 11.25.3-r1 masked
Am December 6, 2020 9:23:07 PM UTC schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: >I'm looking at the output of "equery y asterisk" >and it shows asterisk-11.25.3-r1 is masked >and https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/net-misc/asterisk show as >stable (amd64) > >Why is it masked on my system? It is masked on every system! As the mask says users should upgrade to newer versions! I guess https://packages.gentoo.org does not consider packages masked by profiles. You can give your feedback about it here: https://packages.gentoo.org/about/feedback -- Best regards Daniel
Re: [gentoo-user] askterisk 11.25.3-r1 masked
On 12/06/2020 02:34 PM, Michael Cook wrote: > On 12/6/20 4:23 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> I'm looking at the output of "equery y asterisk" >> and it shows asterisk-11.25.3-r1 is masked >> and https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/net-misc/asterisk show as >> stable (amd64) >> >> Why is it masked on my system? >> > > It's EOL Trying to emerge it, without unmasking anything, it just gives me slot conflict. emerge -avq =net-misc/asterisk-11.25.3-r1 [ebuild N] acct-group/asterisk-0 [ebuild N] net-misc/asterisk-core-sounds-1.6.1-r1 USE="gsm -alaw -g722 -g729 -siren14 -siren7 -sln16 -ulaw -wav" L10N="-en-AU -en-GB -es -fr -it -ja -ru -sv" [ebuild N] net-misc/asterisk-extra-sounds-1.5.2 USE="gsm -alaw -g722 -g729 -siren14 -siren7 -sln16 -ulaw -wav" L10N="-en-GB -fr" [ebuild N] net-misc/asterisk-moh-opsound-2.03-r1 USE="gsm -alaw -g722 -g729 -siren14 -siren7 -sln16 -ulaw -wav" [ebuild N] acct-group/dialout-0 [ebuild N] acct-user/asterisk-0 [ebuild UD] dev-libs/openssl-1.0.2u [1.1.1g] USE="asm bindist sslv3* tls-heartbeat* zlib -gmp% -kerberos% -rfc3779 -sctp -sslv2% -static-libs -test -vanilla" ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)" CPU_FLAGS_X86="(sse2)" [ebuild N] net-misc/asterisk-11.25.3-r1 USE="alsa bluetooth caps iconv samples vorbis -calendar -cluster -curl -dahdi -debug -doc -freetds -gtalk -http -ilbc -ldap -libedit -libressl -lua -mysql -newt -odbc -oss -portaudio -postgres -radius (-selinux) -snmp -span -speex -srtp -static -syslog -xmpp" VOICEMAIL_STORAGE="file -imap -odbc" !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: dev-libs/openssl:0 This might be the reason, it it masked in my portage tree because of dev-libs/openssl-1.1.1g
Re: [gentoo-user] askterisk 11.25.3-r1 masked
On 12/6/20 4:23 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: I'm looking at the output of "equery y asterisk" and it shows asterisk-11.25.3-r1 is masked and https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/net-misc/asterisk show as stable (amd64) Why is it masked on my system? It's EOL
