Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are fighting
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:59:24 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Thanks for the decode, I hope I'll get better at understanding this kind > of error output in future. You will, it takes a while to learn to speak portagese :) > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:28:32 > > From: Neil Bothwick > > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are > > fighting > > > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:40:43 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > > > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sys-apps/busybox" has unmet > > > requirements. > > > - sys-apps/busybox-1.32.0-r1::gentoo USE="ipv6 pam static systemd > > > -debug -livecd -make-symlinks -math -mdev -savedconfig (-selinux) > > > -sep-usr -syslog" ABI_X86="(64)" > > > > > > The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: > > > pam? ( !static ) > > > > It means that if you have the pam USE flag set, the static flag must > > be unset. You can have one or the other, or neither, but not both. > > > > > > > -- Neil Bothwick If a deaf person swears, does his mother wash his hands with soap? pgpH8CqFMwgiV.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are fighting
Thanks, Now I got me a slot conflict. That's the first time I ever ran into one of those but I suppose they're a gentoo feature. On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:28:32 > From: Neil Bothwick > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are > fighting > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:40:43 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sys-apps/busybox" has unmet > > requirements. > > - sys-apps/busybox-1.32.0-r1::gentoo USE="ipv6 pam static systemd > > -debug -livecd -make-symlinks -math -mdev -savedconfig (-selinux) > > -sep-usr -syslog" ABI_X86="(64)" > > > > The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: > > pam? ( !static ) > > It means that if you have the pam USE flag set, the static flag must be > unset. You can have one or the other, or neither, but not both. > > > -- United States has 633 Billionaires with only 10 doing any annual significant giving.
Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are fighting
I think I like neither, makes use flags a little shorter. I know what I've done in make.conf it's the rest of the system I need to research. On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:28:32 > From: Neil Bothwick > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are > fighting > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:40:43 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sys-apps/busybox" has unmet > > requirements. > > - sys-apps/busybox-1.32.0-r1::gentoo USE="ipv6 pam static systemd > > -debug -livecd -make-symlinks -math -mdev -savedconfig (-selinux) > > -sep-usr -syslog" ABI_X86="(64)" > > > > The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: > > pam? ( !static ) > > It means that if you have the pam USE flag set, the static flag must be > unset. You can have one or the other, or neither, but not both. > > > -- United States has 633 Billionaires with only 10 doing any annual significant giving.
Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are fighting
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:59 PM Jude DaShiell wrote: > Thanks for the decode, I hope I'll get better at understanding this kind > of error output in future. > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:28:32 > > From: Neil Bothwick > > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are > > fighting > > > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:40:43 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > > > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sys-apps/busybox" has unmet > > > requirements. > > > - sys-apps/busybox-1.32.0-r1::gentoo USE="ipv6 pam static systemd > > > -debug -livecd -make-symlinks -math -mdev -savedconfig (-selinux) > > > -sep-usr -syslog" ABI_X86="(64)" > > > > > > The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: > > > pam? ( !static ) > > > > It means that if you have the pam USE flag set, the static flag must be > > unset. You can have one or the other, or neither, but not both. > > As a related comment, I highly recommend having a statically linked busybox installed on your system. It can save your bacon if something breaks. Several years ago there was a problem where "expr" was missing a dependency on gmp. gmp got upgraded without rebuilding "expr", and that resulted in "expr" not working. I tried to reinstall "expr" but emerge required "expr" to work so I was in a bind. Luckily I had a statically linked busybox on the system - I just hard-linked busybox to "/usr//bin/expr" and that was sufficient to get emerge to rebuild the proper "expr". This was a case where even booting with a live CD would have been tricky, because as soon as I'd done a chroot I would have ended up with the same broken "expr". Having a static busybox saved me a lot of hassle. -- Manuel A. McLure WW1FA <http://www.mclure.org> ...for in Ulthar, according to an ancient and significant law, no man may kill a cat. -- H.P. Lovecraft
Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are fighting
Thanks for the decode, I hope I'll get better at understanding this kind of error output in future. On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:28:32 > From: Neil Bothwick > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are > fighting > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:40:43 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sys-apps/busybox" has unmet > > requirements. > > - sys-apps/busybox-1.32.0-r1::gentoo USE="ipv6 pam static systemd > > -debug -livecd -make-symlinks -math -mdev -savedconfig (-selinux) > > -sep-usr -syslog" ABI_X86="(64)" > > > > The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: > > pam? ( !static ) > > It means that if you have the pam USE flag set, the static flag must be > unset. You can have one or the other, or neither, but not both. > > > -- United States has 633 Billionaires with only 10 doing any annual significant giving.
Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are fighting
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:40:43 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sys-apps/busybox" has unmet > requirements. > - sys-apps/busybox-1.32.0-r1::gentoo USE="ipv6 pam static systemd > -debug -livecd -make-symlinks -math -mdev -savedconfig (-selinux) > -sep-usr -syslog" ABI_X86="(64)" > > The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: > pam? ( !static ) It means that if you have the pam USE flag set, the static flag must be unset. You can have one or the other, or neither, but not both. -- Neil Bothwick Honk if you love peace and quiet. pgpiOtq88Z7CJ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
