[Gimp-developer] Minimal color management strategy for GIMP 2.8

2010-01-23 Thread Martin Nordholts
Hi

Right now we don't have a clearly defined color management strategy for 
GIMP.

I would like us to settle a minimal color management strategy for GIMP 
so that we can fix some inconsistencies in our color management, in 
particular for PNG [1], for 2.8. In short the problem with PNG is that 
the current code always writes an sRGB chunk to a PNG file if no color 
profile is attached to the image and no gamma is specified.

I suggest that we formally settle with this minimal color management 
strategy:



An image either has or has not a color profile attached. A color
profile is attached as a GimpParasite named icc-profile.

For images that have a color profile attached, this color profile is
used when displaying the image and is embedded when the image is saved
or exported.

For images that does not have a color profile attached, the global
color profile defined under Color Management in Preferences is used to
display the image, but no profile is embedded into saved or exported
files.



So, does the above sound like a sound foundation for color management in 
GIMP? I don't expect us to have time to apply this strategy consistently 
all over GIMP for 2.8 but at least we have settled on something that we 
can put in devel-docs and continue to build on later, and it allows us 
to fix the PNG problem for 2.8.

  / Martin



[1]
PNG output: omit unwanted chunks (sRGB)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599065



-- 

My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
Best way to keep up with GIMP from git
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Wiki down.

2010-01-23 Thread Jon Senior
Having discussed here the possibility of helping out with wiki admin, I've 
spent the last week or two attempting to set up an account. Attempting 
because wiki.gimp.org is not responding. I did query this in my original email 
on the subject, attempts to ping it return:

From soda-10g-edge.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (169.229.59.242) icmp_seq=2 Destination 
Host Unreachable

I can't find any references in Bugzilla, but this has been down now for around 
2 weeks (at least). On the off-chance that it's just an issue at my end, can 
anyone else connect to it, or is the wiki truely dead?

If it's the latter, then do we have a way of resurrecting it? :-)

-- 
Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Wiki down.

2010-01-23 Thread Michael Schumacher
On 23.01.2010 10:46, Jon Senior wrote:
 Having discussed here the possibility of helping out with wiki admin, I've 
 spent the last week or two attempting to set up an account. Attempting 
 because wiki.gimp.org is not responding. I did query this in my original 
 email on the subject, attempts to ping it return:
 
 From soda-10g-edge.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (169.229.59.242) icmp_seq=2 
 Destination Host Unreachable
 
 I can't find any references in Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600757


HTH,
Michael

-- 
GIMP  http://www.gimp.org  | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp
Wiki  http://wiki.gimp.org | .de: http://gimpforum.de
Plug-ins  http://registry.gimp.org |
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Wiki down.

2010-01-23 Thread Jon Senior
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:24:54 +0100
Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote:

 On 23.01.2010 10:46, Jon Senior wrote:
  Having discussed here the possibility of helping out with wiki admin, I've 
  spent the last week or two attempting to set up an account. Attempting 
  because wiki.gimp.org is not responding. I did query this in my original 
  email on the subject, attempts to ping it return:
  
  From soda-10g-edge.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (169.229.59.242) icmp_seq=2 
  Destination Host Unreachable
  
  I can't find any references in Bugzilla
 
 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600757

OK. That's getting on a bit now. Is there an ETA for the switch back?

-- 
Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Minimal color management strategy for GIMP 2.8

2010-01-23 Thread Omari Stephens
On 01/23/2010 08:04 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
 Hi

 Right now we don't have a clearly defined color management strategy for
 GIMP.

 I would like us to settle a minimal color management strategy for GIMP
 so that we can fix some inconsistencies in our color management, in
 particular for PNG [1], for 2.8. In short the problem with PNG is that
 the current code always writes an sRGB chunk to a PNG file if no color
 profile is attached to the image and no gamma is specified.

 I suggest that we formally settle with this minimal color management
 strategy:


 
 An image either has or has not a color profile attached. A color
 profile is attached as a GimpParasite named icc-profile.

 For images that have a color profile attached, this color profile is
 used when displaying the image and is embedded when the image is saved
 or exported.

 For images that does not have a color profile attached, the global
 color profile defined under Color Management in Preferences is used to
 display the image, but no profile is embedded into saved or exported
 files.
 


 So, does the above sound like a sound foundation for color management in
 GIMP? I don't expect us to have time to apply this strategy consistently
 all over GIMP for 2.8 but at least we have settled on something that we
 can put in devel-docs and continue to build on later, and it allows us
 to fix the PNG problem for 2.8.

Sounds eminently reasonable; I had run into this issue also.

I had naively signed up for the work on color management job.  That 
said, do you happen to know where the sRGB thingie is added by default? 
  (if not, I can probably find it, but if you know offhand, I'm not 
beyond laziness ;o)

I had also been taking a peek at [2] and [3], which also seem to fall 
under the umbrella of this desired behavior.  Finally, [4] is something 
that bites me a lot, but needs some UI/UX work.  guiguru?

[2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556608 Monitor color 
profile is not applied to filter preview
[3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478528 Layer previews 
are not color managed
[4] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320447 fast switching 
between 'color managed display' and 'softproof'

--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer