Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-08 Thread Ilya Zakharevich
On 2009-09-06, photocomix for...@gimpusers.com wrote:

 Zoom tool only modifies the view... is that non destructive enough?

Not enough.  (Did you mean that you do not care about what
magnification an image is shown at?)

 The point was not if you (or somebody else) care about magnification an
 image is shown :
 the point is that  operation is absolutely not destructive ..nothing change
 in the imagine not the size not a single pixel

This can hardly be true, since unwanted zooming is very
destructive.  My (assumingly carefully designed) workspace is no more.

 I cannot imagine something less destructive except that a button with no
 functions at all, except that to provide the pleasure to click safety on
 something, but without fear or risk of consequences

I assume you have never heard about image being panned by mouse?!

 While are excellent image viewer/converter (as example for Windows Xnview and
 Irfanview )that integrate very well in the gimp workflow.

Irfanview is - in many respects - horrible.  It won't keep position
when zooming.  There is no convenient way to tune brightness/gamma.  I
do not see a simple way to make pressing `2' go to 1/2 zoom.  Just to
list a few...

Hope this helps,
Ilya

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-06 Thread Ilya Zakharevich
On 2009-09-06, David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com wrote:

 However, when the program explicitly states its purpose

 http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign#product_vision

 You will need to explain how your request is relevant to that vision
 in order to have any likelihood of having your proposition accepted.

Does not this remind you again the we know that we know better adage?

And sorry, but when I read these scrapbooks, I get very strong
suspicion that they are written by the same people who claim that GIMP
is better than Photoshop :-(...

  [But I do not think that this list is the best place to discuss
   these notes...  Is it?]

     Am I so special?  Do other edit-not-create people use different
     workflow?

 I just drag with the middle mouse button, or the stylus button, to
 pan, myself.

... omitting the fact that 50% of computers do not have a middle
button, 99% of the rest have a wiggling worm (specially designed to
make dragging much less reliable) instead a middle button.  (And I
heard that a portable stylus costs about the same as the computer it
is connected to...  How many are sold?  10?)

 (or I use the navigation view (icon in the bottom right corner of
 the image view)

... to use which one needs to hunt first a teeny-weeny square with a
mouse, which works in the reversed direction, with non-intuitive
magnification factor (and any interruption of dragging forces one to
hunt the starting point again...).

 If I mainly edited, rather than having a fairly even balance of edit
 vs create, I would probably set the Zoom tool as the default

Would not then accidental clicking ruin your zoom ratio?

 (or possibly the Measure tool).

[Never used it myself.  Might be a good non-tool.  But having a useful
for-something tool would be much more useful, would not it? ;-]

 I might even make the cursor keys scroll the display rather than
 adjusting opacity etc.

In Emacs, where I use about 5 or 6 different granularities for
navigation with cursor keys (char/word/sexp/enclosing-sexp/sentence),
I somehow manage to remember the strength ordering of modifier keys.
(As in

 Alt=Meta is stronger than Ctrl, and Alt-Ctrl=Meta-Ctrl is yet stronger

).

However, in picture viewing environments it does not come naturally -
I never remember which key makes what kind of movement
(px/10px/0.1viewport/viewport/to-the-end).  (Maybe because the natural
unit of movement in editor - 1char - is the minimal of possible
movements, while for viewing 0.1viewport is much more natural binding
for Left/Right/Up/Down keys?)

So I find panning by keyboard non-intuitive.  (Unless I want
go-to-the-end, which is, obviously, on the strongest amplifier
Ctrl-Meta=Ctrl-Alt.)

Yours,
Ilya

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-06 Thread Ilya Zakharevich
On 2009-09-04, GSR - FR fam...@infernal-iceberg.com wrote:
 The first thing I do when entering GIMP is switching to the eyepicker
 (or is is dropper? ;-) tool.  But it is not non-destructive enough;
 and it is useless as a default tool.

 Zoom tool only modifies the view... is that non destructive enough?

Not enough.  (Did you mean that you do not care about what
magnification an image is shown at?)

Ilya

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-06 Thread photocomix

 Zoom tool only modifies the view... is that non destructive enough?

Not enough.  (Did you mean that you do not care about what
magnification an image is shown at?)



The point was not if you (or somebody else) care about magnification an
image is shown :
the point is that  operation is absolutely not destructive ..nothing change
in the imagine not the size not a single pixel

I cannot imagine something less destructive except that a button with no
functions at all, except that to provide the pleasure to click safety on
something, but without fear or risk of consequences

Then i really love use SW in ways not Imagined by the developers

But the use of gimp as Image viewer WAS imagined,even attempted by few  and
most agree that Use gimp as Image viewer will be a PITA

While are excellent image viewer/converter (as example for Windows Xnview and
Irfanview )that integrate very well in the gimp workflow.

Then if you prefer try to use as Image Viewer you may well do, but without
pretending that is a new original and creative idea

Is original as use a knife as was a screwdriver

For me  Gimp used as image viewer is even worse then a knife used as
screwdriver



-- 
photocomix (via www.gimpusers.com)
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-05 Thread Olivier Lecarme
It seems that the whole preceding thread is focused on the wrong point.
The initial writers want a non-tool because they want to click on the
image window without doing anything. But why do they want to click it?
Certainly only for giving it the focus.

That means that they are doing it the wrong way, even if they are doing
this all the time. With a decent window manager, you have the option to
give the focus to a window as soon as the mouse pointer is above it.
With any window manager, you can focus on a given window by clicking on
its title bar, or by using some key combination like Alt-TAB.

Use one of these possibilities, make it an automatic action, and you
will never again need to click anywhere on a window without wanting to
do something there.

-- 


Olivier Lecarme
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-05 Thread Ilya Zakharevich
On 2009-09-04, Chris Mohler cr33...@gmail.com wrote:
 I find it annoying that there
 appears to be no selection tool that turns off all tools.

 I am confused by this feature request.
 The GIMP is an image editing package not an image display package.

 Wrong.  GIMP is a package for whatever the *USER* decides it is going
 to use GIMP for.  And an absence of a convenient non-destructive tool
 is a major misfeature.

 Gnu Image *Manipulation* Program
 http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/manipulate

 If you want to use GIMP as a display program that's fine - but you're
 using the wrong tool for the job...

Uh-oh!  I see I was not clear enough - but I thought it must have been
quite obvious...  So let me try again:

  Why should *A USER* care how some #...@% *named* a tool?

  Why should *A USER* care what *another* user supposes is a correct
  tool for the job?  (Assume that the first user has considered the
  suggestion, appreciated the suggestion, and decided to discard it. ;-)
  [*]

As my software experience goes, if one writes a good program, users
will ALWAYS find some uses for it the designers had no idea about.
This is, in essense, my second law of human-software interaction:

  the combined intelligence of users of a good piece of software is
  always higher than one of its designers.

 OTOH, having a shortcut like 'h'
 for the hand/panning tool would be fine with me - I would use it.

Good - as far as it is assignable to the default.  But `h' is taken
for Heal, I believe...

Yours,
Ilya

P.S. [*] Myself, I do not use GIMP to CREATE graphics.  I use it to
 fix existing images.

 I'm a slow thinker; before I decide HOW would I want to fix a
 particular photo, I investigate all the details I can think of.

 So, while my *intent* is to manipulate an image, THE FIRST
 things I always do are to use GIMP as a viewer.  It might be the
 reason why I consider the default=panning-tool so useful.

 Am I so special?  Do other edit-not-create people use different
 workflow?

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-05 Thread David Gowers
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Ilya Zakharevichnospam-ab...@ilyaz.org wrote:

 Why should *A USER* care how some #...@% *named* a tool?

 Why should *A USER* care what *another* user supposes is a correct
 tool for the job?  (Assume that the first user has considered the
 suggestion, appreciated the suggestion, and decided to discard it. ;-)
 [*]

They shouldn't necessarily, indeed, using a tool in new ways can be
very helpful and informative. However, when the program explicitly
states its purpose

http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign#product_vision

You will need to explain how your request is relevant to that vision
in order to have any likelihood of having your proposition accepted.

 P.S. [*] Myself, I do not use GIMP to CREATE graphics.  I use it to
     fix existing images.

     I'm a slow thinker; before I decide HOW would I want to fix a
     particular photo, I investigate all the details I can think of.

     So, while my *intent* is to manipulate an image, THE FIRST
     things I always do are to use GIMP as a viewer.  It might be the
     reason why I consider the default=panning-tool so useful.

     Am I so special?  Do other edit-not-create people use different
     workflow?
I just drag with the middle mouse button, or the stylus button, to
pan, myself. (or I use the navigation view (icon in the bottom right
corner of the image view)
If I mainly edited, rather than having a fairly even balance of edit
vs create, I would probably set the Zoom tool as the default (or
possibly the Measure tool).  I might even make the cursor keys scroll
the display rather than adjusting opacity etc.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-04 Thread Ilya Zakharevich
On 2009-08-28, Greg Chapman gregtu...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 I find it annoying that there 
 appears to be no selection tool that turns off all tools.

 I am confused by this feature request.

 The GIMP is an image editing package not an image display package. 

Wrong.  GIMP is a package for whatever the *USER* decides it is going
to use GIMP for.  And an absence of a convenient non-destructive tool
is a major misfeature.

The first thing I do when entering GIMP is switching to the eyepicker
(or is is dropper? ;-) tool.  But it is not non-destructive enough;
and it is useless as a default tool.

For me, a possibility to have a Panning tool as the default would
make my life much more useful (one which behaves as mid-mouse-drag).

A few mouses around have a middle button.  And SPACE-panning is
useless if the focus is not on the picture window...

Hope this helps,
Ilya

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-04 Thread Chris Mohler
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Ilya Zakharevichnospam-ab...@ilyaz.org wrote:
 On 2009-08-28, Greg Chapman gregtu...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 I find it annoying that there
 appears to be no selection tool that turns off all tools.

 I am confused by this feature request.

 The GIMP is an image editing package not an image display package.

 Wrong.  GIMP is a package for whatever the *USER* decides it is going
 to use GIMP for.  And an absence of a convenient non-destructive tool
 is a major misfeature.

Gnu Image *Manipulation* Program

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/manipulate

If you want to use GIMP as a display program that's fine - but you're
using the wrong tool for the job...  OTOH, having a shortcut like 'h'
for the hand/panning tool would be fine with me - I would use it.

Chris
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-04 Thread Greg Chapman

On 04 Sep 09 07:27 Ilya Zakharevich nospam-ab...@ilyaz.org said:
  The GIMP is an image editing package not an image display package.
 
 Wrong.  GIMP is a package for whatever the *USER* decides it is 
 going to use GIMP for.  And an absence of a convenient 
 non-destructive tool is a major misfeature.

Well, that's a bit like complaining that your text editor lacks 
formatting tools because you want to use it as a word processor. The 
GIMP's author's certainly didn't set out to make it the ideal image 
viewing software and you shouldn't complain if it doesn't do a job it 
wasn't designed to do.

Having said that, I am surprised that I can't find a way of to select 
my choice of default tool on start up.

Greg Chapman
http://www.gregtutor.plus.com
Helping new users of KompoZer and The GIMP
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-04 Thread Jon Cosby
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 21:16 +0100, Greg Chapman wrote:
 On 04 Sep 09 07:27 Ilya Zakharevich nospam-ab...@ilyaz.org said:
   The GIMP is an image editing package not an image display package.
  
  Wrong.  GIMP is a package for whatever the *USER* decides it is 
  going to use GIMP for.  And an absence of a convenient 
  non-destructive tool is a major misfeature.
 
 Well, that's a bit like complaining that your text editor lacks 
 formatting tools because you want to use it as a word processor. The 
 GIMP's author's certainly didn't set out to make it the ideal image 
 viewing software and you shouldn't complain if it doesn't do a job it 
 wasn't designed to do.
 
 Having said that, I am surprised that I can't find a way of to select 
 my choice of default tool on start up.
 

Click Save the Tool Options Now in the tool options. The currently
selected tool will be selected the next time GIMP starts.



Jon Cosby


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-04 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 09/04/2009 08:27 AM, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
 On 2009-08-28, Greg Chapman gregtu...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 I find it annoying that there 
 appears to be no selection tool that turns off all tools.
 
 I am confused by this feature request.
 
 The GIMP is an image editing package not an image display package. 
 
 Wrong.  GIMP is a package for whatever the *USER* decides it is going
 to use GIMP for.  And an absence of a convenient non-destructive tool
 is a major misfeature.

Whether the absence of such a tool is a misfeature has to be argued
from a product vision [1] perspective. That is, if having such a
tool would help us fulfill our product vision, we should add it.

 / Martin

[1] http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign#product_vision

-- 

My GIMP Blog (new post 0 days ago):
http://www.chromecode.com/

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-09-04 Thread GSR - FR
Hi,
nospam-ab...@ilyaz.org (2009-09-04 at 0627.39 +):
 The first thing I do when entering GIMP is switching to the eyepicker
 (or is is dropper? ;-) tool.  But it is not non-destructive enough;
 and it is useless as a default tool.

Zoom tool only modifies the view... is that non destructive enough?

GSR
 
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-08-28 Thread zed
As a very new user of the Gimp, I find it annoying that there appears to be
no selection tool that turns off all tools.  I am thinking of a package like
Inscape, where the default is that when loaded no tool is selected and one
has to make a selection before anything happens.

Is there such a tool in the Gimp?  If there is, please will someone tell me
how to select it, 'cos I just cannot find it?

Regards from New Zealand on a very pleasant Saturday morning.

Zed
-- 
zed
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-08-28 Thread Greg Chapman
Hi Zed,

On 28 Aug 09 23:58 zed z...@zed.net.nz said:
 I find it annoying that there 
 appears to be no selection tool that turns off all tools.

I am confused by this feature request.

The GIMP is an image editing package not an image display package. 
Therefore, by definition, you will always need some tool turned on in 
order to start work. Why turn everything off?

If the default tool available on startup is not the one you want then 
you just click to change it. What's the difference between this and 
starting with no tool selected and clicking it to start?

At no point will you ever want to turn off ALL tools. The only time 
you'd want to do that is when you want to quit the program, and then 
you might as well quit the program, why turn it into a two stage quit 
the tool then quit the program process?

Effectively, this is the same question that new users often ask, How 
do I stop the pointer change shape? The answer is by stopping moving 
the pointer. In other words, stopping work!  It reflects a total lack 
of undestanding of one of the main functions of the pointer. It's 
telling you what will happen if you click or drag with the current 
tool selected. It's a warning that you may need to change tools, or a 
confirmation that the intended thing will happen as you click or drag.

Greg Chapman
http://www.gregtutor.plus.com
Helping new users of KompoZer and The GIMP
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-08-28 Thread zed
Greg Chapman gregtu...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

 Hi Zed,
 
 On 28 Aug 09 23:58 zed z...@zed.net.nz said:
  I find it annoying that there appears to be no selection tool that turns
  off all tools.
 
[snipped but read and absorbed]
 
 Effectively, this is the same question that new users often ask, How do I
 stop the pointer change shape? The answer is by stopping moving the
 pointer. In other words, stopping work!  It reflects a total lack of
 understanding of one of the main functions of the pointer. It's telling
you
 what will happen if you click or drag with the current tool selected. It's
 a warning that you may need to change tools, or a confirmation that the
 intended thing will happen as you click or drag.

You are absolutely correct, Greg, it is my lack of understanding which lead
to the question.  That, together with the fact that at the start a tool is
selected and I click on the image and wonder what has happened and how I
change it..  Don't worry, I will train my brain to be more logical.  Put it
down to the fact that I'm well past my use by date and trying to take on
board new concepts is becoming a tad challenging.

Regards

Zed

-- 
zed
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-08-28 Thread phanisvara das
On Saturday 29 August 2009 08:15:11 zed wrote:
 That, together with the fact that at the start a tool is
 selected and I click on the image and wonder what has happened and how I
 change it..  

i had the same problem when i started using gimp. not used to the shape and 
meaning of pointers, i was wondering what might happen if i clicked somewhere 
on the open image. quick way to choose an inoffensive tool that doesn't 
change anything inadvertantly is hitting e on the keyboard, activating the 
ellypse selection tool, or r for rectangle selection. and if you happen to do 
something you didn't want to, there's always ctrl-z to undo whatever you 
did...

phani.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] A non-tool selection...

2009-08-28 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 08/29/2009 12:58 AM, zed wrote:
 As a very new user of the Gimp, I find it annoying that there appears to be
 no selection tool that turns off all tools.  I am thinking of a package like
 Inscape, where the default is that when loaded no tool is selected and one
 has to make a selection before anything happens.

 Is there such a tool in the Gimp?  If there is, please will someone tell me
 how to select it, 'cos I just cannot find it?

There currently isn't, but the transform tool will be pretty similar to 
the default Inkscape tool:

http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Transformation_tool_specification

  / Martin

-- 

My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user