RH 7.2 GRUB Help
Well, for anyone interested installing Windows XP and RH 7.2 went flawlessly. Basically I started the Linux installation. I used Disk Druid to create a 25Mb /boot, a 16GB partition (it won't let me make a vfat partition greater than 2GB so I made it ext3 then deleted it and rebuilt it under windows), 16GB /, 512MB swap and the balance will be a FAT32 drive. I let the install run until it started copying files. I imagine this is overkill but then again it didn't format the partition(s) until just before this. I stopped the install with a power off and put in the Windows XP virus CD :-) It installed with no particular problems. I DID NOT allow it to select partitions for me. It installed just fine on the E: drive (not completely sure why it picked that drive but it's OK by me). Then I installed RH 7.2. I had to use Disk Druid to set up my mount points again but the partitions themselves were fine. I kept the default for GRUB, which I think installs it into the MBR. Someone had suggested against that. At any rate the installation worked fine. GRUB works fine. The system dual boots very well. I had to modify the fstab to mount up the Windows XP drive but that was no problem. I just don't know why they didn't do it for me. I could have sworn they used to. So here's the problem. I put back my original hard drive as a slave on the IDE channel. It comes up as a C: drive. I tried adding it to the GRUB menu, but I can't get it to boot. Should I be able to boot this Windows 98SE drive? When I tell it to boot from (1,0) it just hangs, although first it does identify the drive as being VFAT or FAT32. I tried using the Map (0,1) and Map (1,0). I tried at least 20 different variations but couldn't get it to boot. I don't have my notes with me right now but I used the commands exactly as stated in the GRUB manual. Thanks for any help. GGK * To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *
Re: call graph
I don't think that Quantify and Purify are available for Linux. Both are available for Tru64 Unix though. On 1 Apr 2002 at 15:20, Kevin D. Clark wrote: > > "Mansur, Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Perhaps someone asked this question before, but . . . are there any good call >graph generators for c programs available for Linux? I downloaded one available on >Debian called cflow, and it leaves a lot to be desired. > > If you're more interested in a call-graph that combines runtime > information, I would recommend looking at the output of gprof. > > If you go down this road, I've heard good things about VCG > (http://www.ida.liu.se/~vaden/cgdi/#xvcg). > > > I don't think that it is available for Linux, but Rational's Quantify > is similar. > > > Neither one of these is a pure call graph generator; they depend on > runtime information as well. I've used both and found them to be very > useful. > > > Any call graph program that integrates nicely with emacs? > > etags? (-: > > --kevin > -- > Kevin D. Clark (CetaceanNetworks.com!kclark) | > Cetacean Networks, Inc. | Give me a decent UNIX > Portsmouth, N.H. (USA)| and I can move the world > alumni.unh.edu!kdc (PGP Key Available)| > > > * > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. > * -- Jerry Feldman Portfolio Partner Engineering 508-467-4315 http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/linux/ Compaq Computer Corp. 200 Forest Street MRO1-3/F1 Marlboro, Ma. 01752 * To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *
Re: call graph
"Mansur, Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Perhaps someone asked this question before, but . . . are there any good call graph >generators for c programs available for Linux? I downloaded one available on Debian >called cflow, and it leaves a lot to be desired. If you're more interested in a call-graph that combines runtime information, I would recommend looking at the output of gprof. If you go down this road, I've heard good things about VCG (http://www.ida.liu.se/~vaden/cgdi/#xvcg). I don't think that it is available for Linux, but Rational's Quantify is similar. Neither one of these is a pure call graph generator; they depend on runtime information as well. I've used both and found them to be very useful. > Any call graph program that integrates nicely with emacs? etags? (-: --kevin -- Kevin D. Clark (CetaceanNetworks.com!kclark) | Cetacean Networks, Inc. | Give me a decent UNIX Portsmouth, N.H. (USA)| and I can move the world alumni.unh.edu!kdc (PGP Key Available)| * To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *
MS Exchange word wrap (was: call graph)
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, at 1:13pm, Mansur, Warren wrote: > Also FYI, I know this email will wrap at 90 lines since Outlook 2000 used > with Exchange gives no option to wrap the lines. Open the "Exchange System Manager" management console. Open the "Global Settings" container. From there, open the "Internet Message Formats" container. Select the "Default" rule. Right-click, choose "Properties". Choose the "Advanced" tab. Under "Message text word wrap", fill in a value less than 80. I recommend 75. Click "OK" until you are back to the main console window. You need administrative rights to the Exchange organization to do this. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | * To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *
call graph
Hi, Perhaps someone asked this question before, but . . . are there any good call graph generators for c programs available for Linux? I downloaded one available on Debian called cflow, and it leaves a lot to be desired. Any call graph program that integrates nicely with emacs? Also FYI, I know this email will wrap at 90 lines since Outlook 2000 used with Exchange gives no option to wrap the lines. I'm looking for an alternative email client to use while posting to this list so please no flames about this. Thanks. Warren Mansur RELIABLE TRANSACTION ROUTER http://www.compaq.com/rtr * To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *
Re: Internet Shutdown
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 12:14, Rich C wrote: > I also heard a team of Qwest engineers were going to ride > the lines looking for these stuck dark bits. Finally - something in this thread that I CAN believe. I have no problem whatsoever believing Qwest would do this. 8) -- I haven't lost my mind! It's backed up on disk somewhere... Cole Tuininga Lead Developer Code Energy, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] (603) 766-2208 PGP Key ID: 0x43E5755D * To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *
Re: Internet Shutdown
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>>No, this thing has been going around for about a week now. I've >>>gotten 3 or 4 copies. All it takes is changing the From: header on >>>your outgoing mail. Someone did this and then sent it to gnhlug, >>>probably from within zk3 :) >>>(Bayard? ;) Not guilty, your honor. The dragon did it: >>> Received: from dragon.inside.ntisys.com (h-64-105-111-43.CMBRMAOR.covad.net >[64.105.111.43]) by itchy.ntisys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2Q0FqD21862; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 19:15:52 -0500 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from anw.zk3.dec.com by oflume.zk3.dec.com (8.11.6/1.1.22.3/03Mar00-0551AM) id g2TIqcR00819; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:52:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by anw.zk3.dec.com (8.9.3/1.1.22.2/08Sep98-0251PM) id NAA0001019750; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:52:26 -0500 (EST) Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There was one individual who spotted this Friday afternoon and ordered Ben to the Principal's office, but sadly, I deleted that e-mail. As good as our systems are here, I know they're not good enough to shutdown the Internet. Houston won't let us... (Darn! :-). Happy Monday, everyone! Bayard * To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *
Re: [OT] FW: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (?)
On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 20:17, Karl J. Runge wrote: > Does anyone have a rough idea on how the RSA and DH algorithm scale > with key size in their day to day usage? (initial key generation and > key usage) I'd guess it's some small power of the number of bits... > I'm not talking about the cracking algorithms, just the base > algorithm. I'm not quite sure of the actual scaling capabilities, but I know you can create fairly large keys (10240-20480 bits) for use with many VPN's. FreeS/WAN, in particular, in shared-key mode will use these large keys, both public and private, for the initial authentication and initialization of a tunnel. > I've always wanted to jack the key sizes under my control (ssh + pgp) > to, oh say, 10,000 bits if I could. I've never mentioned that desire > in public from fear of retribution :-) I personally have no problem > adding a few seconds to each ssh and pgp usage. The algorithms themselves are perfectly capable of large keys. However, the application may be limited as to the size that it will accept. Then again, if you have the source, I suppose you can change that, too ;-) C-Ya, Kenny -- "Tact is just *not* saying true stuff" -- Cordelia Chase Kenneth E. Lussier Sr. Systems Administrator Zuken, USA PGP KeyID CB254DD0 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCB254DD0 * To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *
