Re: Eee PC hands on?

2007-12-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Dec 17, 2007 1:43 PM, Kent Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am concerned about the small size of the screen and keyboard.

  I've seen the Classmate hands-on, and I've seen scale photos of
the XO-1 and Eee, and they all look about the same in terms of
keyboard size and screen dimensions.  All are small.  The screens are
all in the neighborhood of 7 diagonal; measure that out on paper to
see just how small that is.  The keyboard keys are smaller and closer
together than most anything I've seen on the likes of a ThinkPad,
Dell, etc.   If you're thinking this will be like my
Thinkpad/Dell/whatever, just a bit smaller, you'll probably be
disappointed.

  These things are designed to be small and light first.  You're never
going to get full-sized features with that.  They're also designed to
be cheap, durable, and low-power.  Hence all the buzz.  As we all
know, buzz doesn't mean they're the right tool for every job.  :)
Myself, I'm interested in them as an intermediate step between
handheld computer (on my belt), and full-sized laptop (in a separate
bag, protected).  These might be cheap and durable enough that I'd be
comfortable having one in my regular handbag, without constantly
worrying about it being lost, stolen, or broken.

  One thing I don't know much about is comparative screen quality.
I've seen spec numbers tossed about with wild abandon, but none of
that really tells you how the things work in real use.  Especially the
bright sunlight the XO-1 is supposed to do super-good in.

 and can wait if something better is in the pipeline.

  Something better is *always* in the pipeline.  :-)  But even knowing
that, I'm likely waiting for it.  I'll save you a spot in line.  ;-)

-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: Eee PC hands on?

2007-12-17 Thread Kent Johnson
Ben Scott wrote:

 If you're thinking this will be like my
 Thinkpad/Dell/whatever, just a bit smaller, you'll probably be
 disappointed.

No, not thinking that. I know it is not like my MacBook, that is why I 
would like to get my hands on one.

   These things are designed to be small and light first.  You're never
 going to get full-sized features with that.  They're also designed to
 be cheap, durable, and low-power.  Hence all the buzz.  As we all
 know, buzz doesn't mean they're the right tool for every job.  :)

I am thinking of this for a few specific jobs:
- for my daughter to use while for web surfing and writing away from her 
desktop.
- for me and my daughters to use next summer for web surfing and email 
when I take a trip abroad.

In both cases the alternative is my MacBook Pro, which works great but 
is also larger, heavier, sometimes in use by me, and worth 5-10 times 
what the Eee PC is, all of which are disadvantages for some or all of 
the listed uses.

Kent
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: Eee PC hands on?

2007-12-17 Thread Alex Hewitt

On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 14:35 -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
 On Dec 17, 2007 1:43 PM, Kent Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I am concerned about the small size of the screen and keyboard.
 
   I've seen the Classmate hands-on, and I've seen scale photos of
 the XO-1 and Eee, and they all look about the same in terms of
 keyboard size and screen dimensions.  All are small.  The screens are
 all in the neighborhood of 7 diagonal; measure that out on paper to
 see just how small that is.  The keyboard keys are smaller and closer
 together than most anything I've seen on the likes of a ThinkPad,
 Dell, etc.   If you're thinking this will be like my
 Thinkpad/Dell/whatever, just a bit smaller, you'll probably be
 disappointed.
 
   These things are designed to be small and light first.  You're never
 going to get full-sized features with that.  They're also designed to
 be cheap, durable, and low-power.  Hence all the buzz.  As we all
 know, buzz doesn't mean they're the right tool for every job.  :)
 Myself, I'm interested in them as an intermediate step between
 handheld computer (on my belt), and full-sized laptop (in a separate
 bag, protected).  These might be cheap and durable enough that I'd be
 comfortable having one in my regular handbag, without constantly
 worrying about it being lost, stolen, or broken.
 
   One thing I don't know much about is comparative screen quality.
 I've seen spec numbers tossed about with wild abandon, but none of
 that really tells you how the things work in real use.  Especially the
 bright sunlight the XO-1 is supposed to do super-good in.
 
  and can wait if something better is in the pipeline.
 

One form factor that has appeal is something the size of a Mac mini. The
problem of course is the display. I used to think that those small units
that attached to your eyeglasses or could be worn like eyeglasses would
be a great solution but this technology has never quite made it into the
main stream. What I'd like is something that projects a high resolution
screen out and that would appear to be at a normal viewing distance. I
guess one big problem is that the real device is pretty much useless in
bright light. The other issue is the sheer expense of these things. I
googled this article that claims that embedded screens might be
available soon:

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2704,667638,00.asp

In any case, marry a system the size of a Mac Mini to a pair of these
glasses and then add some kind of bluetooth input device and you'd have
something that could easily be carried anywhere and that would have
normal desktop performance.

-Alex

P.S. Obviously almost any low power small form factor system that could
display VGA would work with the display device and the appropriate input
devices.

   Something better is *always* in the pipeline.  :-)  But even knowing
 that, I'm likely waiting for it.  I'll save you a spot in line.  ;-)
 
 -- Ben
 ___
 gnhlug-discuss mailing list
 gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
 http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/

___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


[OT] VOIP provider recommendations

2007-12-17 Thread Dan Jenkins
A client of mine is looking into VOIP and has a proposal recommending 
IPTelesis, who I have never heard of.
They need 40 telephones and 9 voice paths according to the proposal, 
which is estimated to cost $850,

including 500 minutes domestic long distance.

I am not that familiar with VOIP pricing (though I do use Vonage and the 
like). Just wanted to get

anyone's take of this vendor and if the pricing seems reasonable.

Thanks.

begin:vcard
fn:Dan Jenkins
n:Jenkins;Dan
org:Rastech Inc.
adr:;;21 Curtis Lane;Bedford;NH;03110;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Technical Director
tel;work:1-603-206-9951
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: [OT] VOIP provider recommendations

2007-12-17 Thread Bill McGonigle
On Dec 17, 2007, at 18:01, Dan Jenkins wrote:

 A client of mine is looking into VOIP and has a proposal  
 recommending IPTelesis, who I have never heard of.
 They need 40 telephones and 9 voice paths according to the  
 proposal, which is estimated to cost $850,
 including 500 minutes domestic long distance.

 I am not that familiar with VOIP pricing (though I do use Vonage  
 and the like). Just wanted to get
 anyone's take of this vendor and if the pricing seems reasonable.


What else does that include?  Are they running their own PBX or does  
that include PBX hosting or an onsite PBX?  Is that a monthly or  
yearly cost?  Does it include the telephone rental (what kinds)?  How  
many phone numbers?  A separate switch and cable plant for VOIP?

Lacking data, here's a scenario:  if instance they own their own  
phones and asterisk box, and want 9 phone numbers the provider I'm  
using (Junction Networks) would charge $31/mo (.029*450+9*2=31.05)  
plus some setup costs.  I paid, I think $72 for my Grandstream phone,  
the drone-worker models are like $40.   My Asterisk box is an $800  
machine.  If you got all of the phones I got, over 3 years that's  
worth $80/mo.

Assuming everything's provided running on your existing cable plant,  
it sounds like a it should be a $400/mo package with a 2-year contract.

Note, I've seen $10,000 Panasonic VOIP PBX's which don't do  
everything Asterisk does, so this may be a proprietary model vs. open  
source issue re: cost.

-Bill

-
Bill McGonigle, Owner   Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC  Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Cell: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/Page: 603.442.1833
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/
VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf


___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: Eee PC hands on?

2007-12-17 Thread Bill McGonigle

On Dec 17, 2007, at 16:35, Ben Scott wrote:

 That's so lame.  Nobody would ever
 want to walk around with something like that hanging out of their
 ear.  I guess I was wrong on that call.

You were right on the first half of your call, just wrong on the  
second.  We call them bluetools for a reason. ;)

Back to the subject at hand, I have a Nokia n810 on order to fill the  
need folks are talking about.  If PC Connection ever gets their  
shipment I'll tell y'all if it's any good.

-Bill

-
Bill McGonigle, Owner   Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC  Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Cell: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/Page: 603.442.1833
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/
VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf


___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: [OT] VOIP provider recommendations

2007-12-17 Thread Dan Jenkins

Bill McGonigle wrote:

On Dec 17, 2007, at 18:01, Dan Jenkins wrote:
A client of mine is looking into VOIP and has a proposal recommending 
IPTelesis, who I have never heard of.
They need 40 telephones and 9 voice paths according to the proposal, 
which is estimated to cost $850,

including 500 minutes domestic long distance.

I am not that familiar with VOIP pricing (though I do use Vonage and 
the like). Just wanted to get

anyone's take of this vendor and if the pricing seems reasonable.
What else does that include?  Are they running their own PBX or does 
that include PBX hosting or an onsite PBX?  Is that a monthly or 
yearly cost?  Does it include the telephone rental (what kinds)?  How 
many phone numbers?  A separate switch and cable plant for VOIP?

Thanks for the information.

Sorry for the incompleteness. This is a first draft proposal with lots 
of gaps which I barely skimmed before asking my question.


The $850 is a monthly cost. The proposal mentions auto-attendant, 
unified messaging, unlimited local calling and the above 500 Long 
Distance monthly minutes in the $850 price. They have no existing VoIP 
equipment at all. The proposal mentions Polycom IP phones and an 
Edgemarc router. They also mention integrated VoIP/cellular at $40 per 
call path using Meru access points. PBX systems are mentioned as 
ranging from $7,000 to $25,000. No more details provided.
Lacking data, here's a scenario:  if instance they own their own 
phones and asterisk box, and want 9 phone numbers the provider I'm 
using (Junction Networks) would charge $31/mo (.029*450+9*2=31.05) 
plus some setup costs.  I paid, I think $72 for my Grandstream phone, 
the drone-worker models are like $40.   My Asterisk box is an $800 
machine.  If you got all of the phones I got, over 3 years that's 
worth $80/mo.

The Polycom phones are range from $170 to $380 each.
Assuming everything's provided running on your existing cable plant, 
it sounds like a it should be a $400/mo package with a 2-year contract.
New building - new cable plant will be needed - not included in this 
proposal. An existing building may need some phones until they move out 
of it. Some phones in Western site to be integrated into new phone system.
Note, I've seen $10,000 Panasonic VOIP PBX's which don't do everything 
Asterisk does, so this may be a proprietary model vs. open source 
issue re: cost.
PBX model not even specified in the proposal. No existing equipment. 
(Well nothing usable. The old PBX is being retired.)


I just want to be able to suggest another alternative. Or at least to 
give a broader perspective than a captive proposal. Preferably open 
source. I have not used Asterisk, but one of my associates has and said 
good things about it.


begin:vcard
fn:Dan Jenkins
n:Jenkins;Dan
org:Rastech Inc.
adr:;;21 Curtis Lane;Bedford;NH;03110;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Technical Director
tel;work:1-603-206-9951
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: [OT] VOIP provider recommendations

2007-12-17 Thread Ben Scott
On Dec 17, 2007 7:49 PM, Dan Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have not used Asterisk, but one of my associates has and said
 good things about it.

  I saw one of the Asterisk demos (at SLUG) a few years and was blown
away.  Capabilities only available in very high-end, very expensive
proprietary systems, and for free.  CTI up the wazoo.  Things like
integrated CRM, web-based drag-and-drop call routing, PIM contact list
dialing directory integration, simultaneous OPX and in-house ringing,
voicemail/email bridging.  Oh, and it makes phone calls, too.  If we
didn't have a massive existing investment in our Norstar system at
work, I'd replace it with Asterisk in a heartbeat.  (Replacing 100+
extension sets is expensive even if everything else costs nothing (and
it don't cost nothing).)

   I gather the learning curve is more like a learning cliff, but if
you can climb it, or pay someone else to, it looks ultra-impressive.
And again, this was years ago -- things may well have improved
significantly since then.

-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: [OT] VOIP provider recommendations

2007-12-17 Thread Bruce Dawson
Dan Jenkins wrote:
 A client of mine is looking into VOIP and has a proposal recommending
 IPTelesis, who I have never heard of.
 They need 40 telephones and 9 voice paths according to the proposal,
 which is estimated to cost $850,
 including 500 minutes domestic long distance.

 I am not that familiar with VOIP pricing (though I do use Vonage and
 the like). Just wanted to get
 anyone's take of this vendor and if the pricing seems reasonable.

 Thanks.
VOIP pricing is all over the place. I'm getting a bit under $0.02/minute
and $10/month for anywhere in the US/Canada, with unlimited call paths.
This is with Teliax. They also have monthly plans with 1500 and 2500
softcap minutes.

Others have lower prices, but usually have a minimum monthly billing.

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=New+VOIP+services has an
extensive listing of VOIP service providers.

--Bruce
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/