GNHLUG.Organizational - Automated notification of topic changes

2007-08-09 Thread GNHLUG Webmaster

This is an automated email from GNHLUG.

New or changed topics in GNHLUG.Organizational, since 07 Aug 2007 - 23:54:
- MembershipFeePolicy  (TedRoche)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/MembershipFeePolicy
- MailingListPolicy  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/MailingListPolicy
- MailAliases  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/MailAliases
- WebMaster  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/WebMaster
- DomainMaster  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/DomainMaster
- ListMaster  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/ListMaster
- WebSites  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/WebSites
- LimitedCommercializationPolicy  (BenScott)
  
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/LimitedCommercializationPolicy
- WhatDoWeWantToBe  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/WhatDoWeWantToBe
- WebHome  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/WebHome
- ChapterConcept  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/ChapterConcept
- WhatWeAre  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/WhatWeAre
- OurStructure  (BenScott)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/OurStructure


Review recent changes in:
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/WebChanges

Subscribe / Unsubscribe in:
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/WebNotify

___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/


GNHLUG.Main - Automated notification of topic changes

2007-08-09 Thread GNHLUG Webmaster

This is an automated email from GNHLUG.

New or changed topics in GNHLUG.Main, since 02 Aug 2007 - 07:43:
- BruceDawson  (BruceDawson)
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Main/BruceDawson


Review recent changes in:
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Main/WebChanges

Subscribe / Unsubscribe in:
  http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Main/WebNotify

___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/


Membership fee policy

2007-08-09 Thread Ben Scott
  I was cleaning up various parts of the website, and that included
the MembershipFeePolicy page.  I added a couple comments, and then Ted
posted some good points.  Since I know even fewer people pay attention
to that part of the website than this list, and wiki's are cumbersome
for discussion anyway, I figured I'd bring the discussion here.

  For the story so far, see:

http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/MembershipFeePolicy

  My take:

  I think part of the issue with this perennial discussion is
semantics.  We have never define member.  I'm going to continue that
tradition here by side-stepping the definition and talking about what
I think we[1] actually mean.

  When we say GNHLUG shall have no membership fees, I think the
general intent is that we want it to be as easy as possible for people
to be able to be involved with and part of the GNHLUG community.  One
of the purposes of GNHLUG is, I think, to share knowledge, experience,
assistance, and enthusiasm for Linux/FOSS.  More people can benefit
from that if we don't charge for admission.

  That doesn't mean we cannot charge for a given
activity/project/service/whatever, should it be appropriate.  Some
examples: When we have dinner at Martha's, people still have to pay
for their dinner.  When we had the BBQ at Bruce's, everyone had to
bring some food.  If we want to have a catered party, we could charge
a $5 cover.  And so on.  A benefit to this approach is that
contributions go directly to the intended purpose, so contributors are
happier and accounting is easier.

  More generally, free admission does not mean voluntary donations
cannot be accepted.  It is reasonable that the people who make the
donations have the most influence over how they are used.  I think
that's one of the real benefits of having a formal organization (i.e.,
Board of Directors): We can collect general funds and put them towards
things in a way that's more open than We all trust Bob to handle the
money well.

  It is also possible to combine the above: Have a special activity
with a cover charge, where the cover actually exceeds the cost of the
event.  The proceeds go into the general fund.  In practice, this is
identical to charging the lower cover and a voluntary cash donation,
but it has a psychological advantage in that many people are more
willing to donate if there is a more direct and immediate benefit.
That's why PBS sells videos.

  (As an aside: Contributions are not limited to money.  Bring food
is just as much of an admission fee as $5 cover.  Likewise, You can
sell your stuff at our hamfest table if you also volunteer to
evangelize.  Heck, even You can ask questions on -discuss, if you
also are willing to read the discussion.  If you count the time
people give, GNHLUG is rich indeed.)

  Comments?  Commendations?  Condemnations?

-- Ben

[1] We may actually just beI here, but I think I'm not the only
one who thinks this way about this issue.
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/


Re: Membership fee policy

2007-08-09 Thread Michael Kazin
All good points.

I think Ben's train of thought is going in the right direction.
Membership should have various degrees, starting from the public which
should be welcome to attend Freely.  Perhaps an associate level for us
regulars, and then we already have definitions for various corporate
officers.

I've always been a fan of membership fees (and deserved discounts)
either for extra services, or if absolutely necessary:
* As an example of extra services, the FSF provides fee-payers
(Associates) certain items of low cost, which are valued by members
(see https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom).
* Absolutely necessary means the club cannot function without funds.
 Were it the case that our hosting costs were not free, or if we had
to advertise ourselves, then the benefit of having the club would
actually be the above service which members obtained.

At RUSLUG we awarded valued members (no fee, but rather time donated
to the club) with user accounts on the server, which included mail
accounts and web space on a server less restricted than that provided
by the university.  I don't know if GNHLUG wants to open up the server
in that way, but I'd personally love to have an @gnhlug.org account
for LUG business.

As for Ted's suggestion of taxation without representation, I think
that's what board elections and referendums are for.  Certain things
should be voted on by dues-paying members, other things should be
handled by the officers.  The line should be drawn probably based on
either monetary value (the board may, by simple majority expend [x
USD | %y of last years collected dues], larger expenses require either
simple majority of two thirds of the board or a simple majority vote
by due-paying members) or expenditure type (of which I'm not a fan,
because it gets messy real fast).  The university made RUSLUG use a
hybrid system which was a real pain (though mostly made sense
considering 19-year-olds with credit cards and an affinity for liquor
handled thousands of student-body dollars).

I'll leave you nice folks alone now.

Michael
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/