Re: Gnome bugs for 3.0.2 Push
On 05/24/2011 01:45 AM, Jesper Andersen wrote: MUTTER Definitely Want to Have: How about this one: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597190 Window switcher and focus follows mouse It certainly would be useful to me. That patch hasn't even been committed yet, and so has gotten no serious testing, and so is not a candidate for 3.0.2. -- Dan ___ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
Re: Gnome bugs for 3.0.2 Push
For gnome-shell, I've integrated below a list sent to me by Ionut Biru and information about patches in the Fedora 3.0.1 RPM (mostly suggestions from Dan Williams.) Because of the number of patches *on* these lists, I'm not going to look at all at stuff on master nobody proposed or outstanding uncommitted patches that we might to grab at the last minute. ! Already merged * Planning to merge x Not planning to merge After notes in detail on everything, I've grouped things into categories of what I'm planning to merge and not merge. - Owen GNOME Definitely Want To Have: == * d104f9210a8aed12bab7b99f433fe289b96bf808 [Ionut] PopupSliderMenuItem: intercept clicks outside the slider https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646660 Sound indicator should provide a mute button Simple patch, fixes an easily reproducible, if minor issue x d2a16bca10fcc3be39895a99a1607483f4e65fdc [Ionut] altTab: Fix the appSwitcher's allocation https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647807 App Switcher scrolling is broken This one is simple, but depends on fe08ebd for correct operation, and it's almost imposible to trigger alt-Tab scrolling. x fe08edbe2bf88aa43b643a8f8449dd49a3bafabe [Ionut] altTab: fix Alt+Tab scrolling on initial display https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647807 App Switcher scrolling is broken Looks pretty safe, considering that we have undiagnosed crashes when showing altTab already, I'm not really comfortable changing around ordering by forcing an allocation. Does it make it better? Does it make it worse? Who knows. * bafd9c777ade647b2e31f3265ed8970f39f1843c [Ionut] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648765 history: Fix navigation when entering a repeat Safe, localized patch, easy to test and test the fix, but impact is very minor (misbehavior in looking glass only? in chat?) x 0d440bb0a2b3bb277533eb0177b3c7810bf544ea [Ionut] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648894 StTooltip: add missing break statement No user visible impact. (Only possible reason to add this would be an extension using tooltips) * 56d584b7c62bb5d04460d1e0d7abf5c3ac292468 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648983 workspace opacity is wrong after canceled drag Only affects a minor misbehave of a portion of the user interface that people don't usually touch. Patch is superficially completely safe, and easy to test. ! 88de26138a8b79d89884ff2eb6471c5a8e3b39ca shell-xfixes-cursor: missing XFree https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642652 Major memory leak on mutter when using gnome-shell ! 72f9f482d6f1bcb53ea2bd1606818af1f33a5a8c st-private: Fix memory leak ! c975740f9228b2c53d79ac08ad704fca5f1c5b6e st-private: Correct fix for memory leak https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649497 st-private: Fix memory leak x dcd07eb23ff763c84d898a4d9ec886001220eb49 [Ionut] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649508 StTextureCache: plug leak in not-found icon case Patch is not (fully) correct from my reading, don't think the part of the leak that is fixed is big enough to be worth cherry-picking the patch x fb384fc2910091f86058ae3b0021602796b5e0fe https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649633 shell-tp-client: enable client recovery Doesn't make sense in the 3-0 branch - telepathy-glib usage is new in master. x https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631576 Use upstream gettext instead the Glib one No end user impact, not a candidate x https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649981 Use Shell.get_file_contents_utf8_sync over GLib.file_get_contents No end user impact, not a candidate * 63b1699a35b6206747dac0e8ed2ac583618a9e64 [Ionut] panel: Don't propagate button-release-event in _onCornerClicked() https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649427 After triggering the Activities hotcorner, ignore clicks for a split second Very small patch, I gave it some pretty extensive testing; impact isn't big, but if the user happens to have the wrong timing could be annoying. x 48acc41698f21a122f5f920d171fd120218acd35 [Ionut] Don't crash when removing nameless user https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647893 gnome-shell restarts when adding/remove an username without a name Sounds like it fixes a major problem, but I can't reproduce, and the patch doesn't make sense to me. x 986d72d9de055a4871e5a213bac5c022ddfd6c49 [Ionut] configure: remove support for evolution-data-server 1.2 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647395 Can't build due to calendar-server/calendar-sources.h:29:25: fatal error: glib-object.h: No such file or directory Just a cleanup, not relevant for 3.0.x x 71dfab97113d03d0ea722e071f513f53f8572eae [Ionut] altTab: remove erroneous/superflous pick https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650317 crash in Alt+Tab due to bad pick I don't think we've root-caused this problem or fixed the crash x bee37b5bc4aa89174b6dc56289383d0f5bb4a200 [Ionut] lookingGlass: make Esc work on any page
Gnome bugs for 3.0.2 Push
Hello all, I have compiled a list of all the small bugs that have been fixed since the 3.0.1 push that may be nice to have in this upcoming upgrade for both Gnome and Mutter. I hope this will be useful in the decisions you have to make for the upgrade! -Nohemi (GSOC 2011) *GNOME* *Definitely Want To Have*: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646660 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647807 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648765 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648894 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648983 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642652 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649497 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649508 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649633 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631576 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649981 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649427 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647893 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647395 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650317 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647303 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649632 *Nice To Have:* https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648305 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645848 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646919 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646915 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643302 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648739 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648410 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650124 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649596 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639459 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650219 *MUTTER * *Definitely Want to Have: * https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648613 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649504 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649500 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645355 * Nice To Have:* https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649202 ___ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
Re: Gnome bugs for 3.0.2 Push
Hi Nohemi - Welcome to SOC! Thanks a lot for doing this, it's very useful. I'll comment on Mutter patches first since that's a smaller set. - Owen On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:06 -0500, Nohemi Fernandez wrote: MUTTER Definitely Want to Have: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648613 gtk_window_set_opacity() seems not to work with mutter gtk_window_set_opacity() isn't that commonly used, but it has been dup'ed several times. I'll have to retest carefully if I merge this to the branch, since it is sort of big. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649500 leak in theme parser https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649504 region-utils.c: Squash a memory leak These are good candidates, yes. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645355 Use correct GTK+ colors when the application prefers a dark variant This one is actually a really large set of changes implementing a new feature, that we decided against doing for 3.0.0 because they were too large and too invasive, even though the designers really wanted the feature (dark window manager themes for dark borders.) So it isn't a candidate for a 3.0.x update. Nice To Have: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649202 This is a patch that was needed as a prerequisite for the gnome-shell https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649203 (startup and gettext stuff) which does a lot of cleanup, but doesn't have much impact on the user. So, I don't consider it a candidate for 3.0.2. Other stuff I'm probably going to cherry pick == Filter mirrored monitors from the monitors list https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649299 Without this patch, the shell becomes unusable in a confusing and frustrating way if you pick mirror displays in System Settings/Displays. window: don't allow side-by-side tiling of non-maximizable windows https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647901 Somewhat marginal, but should be a very safe patch and fixes a somewhat disturbing UI problem if you accidentally drag dialog/utility windows to the edges of the screen. - Owen ___ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
Re: Gnome bugs for 3.0.2 Push
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:24, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Nohemi - Welcome to SOC! Thanks a lot for doing this, it's very useful. I'll comment on Mutter patches first since that's a smaller set. - Owen On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:06 -0500, Nohemi Fernandez wrote: MUTTER Definitely Want to Have: How about this one: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597190 Window switcher and focus follows mouse It certainly would be useful to me. Jesper ___ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
