Re: Why no-one fights for "white men" (hint: they want it done for them for free) (regarding recent "unrest")
People, what part of not replying to these off-topic messages is so hard to grasp? If you have _nothing_ technically related to say about the GNU system, do not post the message to this list.
Re: Why no-one fights for "white men" (hint: they want it done for them for free) (regarding recent "unrest")
Dear nipponmmail (or someone's hiding under the email cover), I'm going to agree with many of your own concerns, however let's keep this list with a *technical* discussions only. Just because this kind of activity only supports stupid sjws movement to make technical things politicized. Personally I'm not agree with FSF seize, but continuing discussions of this kind here is giving a new occasion to continue a 'witch hunt' for those people. thanks, On Thursday, 25 June 2020 14:57:05 EEST nipponm...@firemail.cc wrote: > Dear LKML, RMS, ESR: Due to the recent "unrest", some who are ignorant > of history, or simply young, are alarmed by happenstances: "Why won't > anyone do anything, why won't anyone fight on our side?" > > In response to the chan post >>>/pol/264739416 an answer was provided: > > YHWH allows men to marry girl children. White men do not: that is why no > one fights for them: not even their own: no pay no work; they are all > divided against eachother and would rather lynch eachother for glancing > at a cute girl and worship "muh whoite wuhman". Their reproductive cycle > has been broken and they cannot win. > > Who would fight for a piece of shit that is their enemy? > > ** > > YHWH allows child brides > > > The Torah explicitly allows men to marry female children, including in > > cases of the rape (tahphas) of the girl child: Devarim chapter 22, > > verse 28. Key words: Na'ar (child (hebrew masoretic text)), Padia > > (child: padia+philos = paedophillia (greek septuagint)) Puella (young > > girl (latin vulgate)) > > Nachmanides points out that a child may be called na'ar from the moment > > he is born > > Rebecca was a child, not an adult. > Na'ar means child in ancient hebrew, not adult, and the original hebrew > in these passages is na'ar, not na'arah. All you have to do is read the > actual hebrew glyphs, not whatever your interlinear renders them as. You > /pol/s are illiterate. > > discover-the-truth.com/2016/11/17/what-was-rebeccas-age-when-given-away-in-m > arriage-naar/ > > ** > > (This is the same reason south african afrikkaner young men didn't > fight: hey pops gunna pay me? Oh you would hang me instead if I even > look at a cute young girl? Sorry then) > > White men do not deserve your support: even if you are a white; your > "fellow" whites are traditional enemies: any group or persons who would > deny you marrying their young daughters is not a friends, countryman, or > ally. Allies form ties by blood. Enemies shed the blood of anyone who > would try: ask yourself: what would your "fellow man" do to you? > > The white man prevents you from having a young girl bride anywhere on > this earth: he hates you more than even a traditional enemy: who would > leave you to your own devices when not engaging him. > > It is better to die than to help your enemy: do not be a useful idiot > for those who will not pay you the wages of your life. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Why no-one fights for "white men" (hint: they want it done for them for free) (regarding recent "unrest")
Le vendredi 26 juin 2020, 02:01:39 CEST Adam Spiers a écrit : > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 00:09, Alexandre François Garreau > > Occasions for which it is a waste of time or not can be sometimes > > tricky to distinguish > > Sure, but in this case personally I don't think it's tricky at all. Same. But as I said, it is the possibility that in some cases this is tricky, that can makes it important to do that everytime. > Of course anyone is free to burn their own time trying to get this > individual to behave rationally, and I might even applaud such efforts > for their patience and tolerance. But I also reserve the right to say > "I told you so" when they fail ;-) Don’t worry, you’re not the first doing so. So nothing “failed” in this perspective. Something has been successful. Take as an example our calm and short exchange ^^
Re: Why no-one fights for "white men" (hint: they want it done for them for free) (regarding recent "unrest")
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 00:09, Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > Le jeudi 25 juin 2020, 22:46:28 CEST Adam Spiers a écrit : > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 14:51, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > > Please refrain from abusing the GNU projects resources and volunteers > > > with this utter vile nonsense and garbage. > > > > If you look at his history of interaction with these lists, it's very > > clear that it's a total waste of time asking him to refrain. The only > > solution is a ban. > > Occasions for which it is a waste of time or not can be sometimes tricky > to distinguish Sure, but in this case personally I don't think it's tricky at all. Of course anyone is free to burn their own time trying to get this individual to behave rationally, and I might even applaud such efforts for their patience and tolerance. But I also reserve the right to say "I told you so" when they fail ;-)
Re: Why no-one fights for "white men" (hint: they want it done for them for free) (regarding recent "unrest")
Le jeudi 25 juin 2020, 22:46:28 CEST Adam Spiers a écrit : > On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 14:51, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > Please refrain from abusing the GNU projects resources and volunteers > > with this utter vile nonsense and garbage. > > If you look at his history of interaction with these lists, it's very > clear that it's a total waste of time asking him to refrain. The only > solution is a ban. Occasions for which it is a waste of time or not can be sometimes tricky to distinguish, as some people, beside of course being able to being malicious, are able to be especially stupid and stuborn. Therefore it is good policy to try to do that everytime, for all occasions. At least to recall that it is not endorsed, that it is not welcome, that people disagree and consider it not good. (PS: then, whether it is a bad thing not to stop people to do bad, whenever you are able to, with whatever means you have, is a different question)
Re: Why no-one fights for "white men" (hint: they want it done for them for free) (regarding recent "unrest")
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 14:51, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Please refrain from abusing the GNU projects resources and volunteers > with this utter vile nonsense and garbage. If you look at his history of interaction with these lists, it's very clear that it's a total waste of time asking him to refrain. The only solution is a ban.
Re: Why no-one fights for "white men" (hint: they want it done for them for free) (regarding recent "unrest")
Please refrain from abusing the GNU projects resources and volunteers with this utter vile nonsense and garbage.
