GtkGlArea with GTK+3 support is now in master
Hi, just a quick mail to notify that GTK+3 version of gtkglarea is now in master ( a gtkglarea-2 branch has been created to keep the GTK+2 version) Apart for the port to GTK+3, there is a namespace change to not conflict with any future integration GL integration in GTK+ and also the use of libepoxy to configure the GL stuff. The zktor example is still not correctly working, but I prefer to merge the patches before they start to bitrot. Tarnyko, sorry we duplicate work here, but it would be great if you rebase your patches to add wayland support :) Please try it and report any regression! Cheers! -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: gtkglarea 2.1.0 released
Hey Tarnyko, sorry for the late reply, On 28 April 2014 10:33, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: Javier Jardón writes: Testing in Windows platform has not been tested, so if you have any problems please report in bugzilla! Just tested it, works perfectly under Win32. Nice! Good to know * Modernize all the code as much as possible before a possible transition to GTK+3 Regarding GTK+3 : there is a patch which has been around for some time on Bugzilla, and that I just adapted for the new release : https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707723#c11 It basically allows specifying a --with-gtk=3 option at configure time (the library still targets GTK+2 by default). Justed tested under Linux and Win32, it builds fine. The functionality stays the same for GTK+2, still needs some additionnal work for Linux Font support (which I have prepared). Do you think it could be merged ? I already pushed a branch in the git repository with the GTK+3 port [1] Sorry, I didnt know those patches already exist. In my approach I removed the support for GTK+2 and focus in GTK+3 only. I will take a look to the patch and see how we can combine our work ;) Everything seems to work but the zkor example, not sure yet why. So if you have any idea it would be great! I also plan to change the namespace [2] of the api to not conflict with future GTK+ work on this. Cheers! [1] https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkglarea/log/?h=jjardon/gtk3 [2] https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkglarea/log/?h=jjardon/namespace_change ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
gtkglarea 2.1.0 released
This is a bugfix release to stop use deprecated api and clean the build system. Testing in Windows platform has not been tested, so if you have any problems please report in bugzilla! Changes in 2.1.0 General * Lots of clean ups in the build system * Modernize all the code as much as possible before a possible transition to GTK+3 * Remove GLU dependency Availability https://download.gnome.org/sources/gtkglarea/2.1/ Contact --- * Bugs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org * Mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkglarea-list Cheers, -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Composite GtkBuilder template
On 7 April 2013 16:34, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 April 2013 07:57, Tristan Van Berkom trista...@openismus.com wrote: So I have to reiterate my question: How exactly does intltool make your life difficult maintaining GTK+ ? I cannot answer for Matthias, but he and I share the same dislike for intltool. FWIW, upstream gettext is getting support for glade files, take a look here [1] [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2013-03/msg00034.html -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?
Hi, On 5 March 2013 11:32, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote: OK, as a majority of people seem to be interested, here is what I will do : 1) Produce binaries of following GTK+3 versions : - 3.4.1 stable (http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libgtk-3-0, Debian Wheezy provides 3.4.2 so we are safe) ; - 3.6.4 development (last one). 2) Package them as .zip files. I will use the same layout as existing GTK+2 .zip files, except for the .spec file which I don't use. 3) Put them, and the corresponding build environments, online. Give links so you folks can download and test them. I will post a new message here when it's ready. Should not be too long. Thanks a lot for your work. Until this get in a more 'official' form Ive added your work to the GTK+ wiki [1], feel free to improve the page if you find something not correct. Also, note that the latest GTK+ stable version is 3.6.4 (the current development version is 3.7.12) Thanks again and keep the good work ;) [1] https://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/Win32 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Adding gtkparasite to gtk?
Hi Christian, On 10 October 2012 17:24, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Now I did miss the updates in that bug thread that mentioned that the latest version of that patch worked on both GTK 2.0 and 3.0. I'm happy to see that, and I'll take a look at it. It slipped through the cracks (we don't pay much attention to that bug tracker, since very few people have ever used it) and it got lost in the noise of patches sent to us over e-mail and GitHub pull requests that broke 2.0 support. . 20 days passed, Is the patch to support GTK+3 already applied? What about the other patches? Regards -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Language Bindings for GTK+ 3.2 (on website)
On 18 September 2012 22:01, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote: On 18/09/12 11:36, Andrew wrote: On 09/17/2012 07:07 AM, Martyn Russell wrote: Hello all, So, I was checking these are up to date after Mathieu Dupuy asked me to update the D language bindings. I have added a GTK+ 3.2 column now and continued the 3.0 binding progress for each case. PLEASE let me know if any status has changed here for your language bindings out there. I can update accordingly. There are bindings for 3.4 for Pascal: http://wiki.freepascal.org/Gtk%2B3 Done, thanks. If there is support for 3.0 and 3.2, let me know, I only updated 3.4 at this point. Hey, Sorry if I misunderstand something, but if a binding support 3.4, Is it not implicit that support all the GTK+3 versions = 3.4 ? -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Glib: AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT
On 17 September 2012 01:38, Lanoxx lan...@gmx.net wrote: Hi Javier, Hey, If you want to use intltool, you have 2 options: remove the gettext macros or keep them and add something like this to your autogen.sh: autopoint --force AUTOPOINT='intltoolize --automake --copy' autoreconf -ivs thanks a lot for these comments. That makes it a lot more clear. It would be awesome if these explanations could be included into the API Docs [1]. I'm curious, what are the reasons that the glib-gettext macros were never deprecated? If they should not be used, then a deprecation warning would be quite useful. [1] http://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.31/glib-I18N.html I laready submit a bug to deprecate some time ago [1] Also to port GLib to upstream gettext [2], but as you see in the comments there are some problems about how upstream gettext update the po files I sent a mail to gettext mailing list [3] about this but seems that It was ignored, maybe you have more luck ;) Regards [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624186 [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622991 [3] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2012-08/msg3.html -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Language Bindings for GTK+ 3.2 / 3.4 (on website)
On 17 September 2012 20:12, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote: On 17/09/12 12:07, Martyn Russell wrote: Hello all, So, I was checking these are up to date after Mathieu Dupuy asked me to update the D language bindings. I have added a GTK+ 3.2 column now and continued the 3.0 binding progress for each case. I have added 3.4 too - I meant to add. Id remove all the 2.x columns and only left 2.24. Its the only GTK+ 2.x supported version anyway Regards -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Glib: AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT
On 15 September 2012 20:16, Lanoxx lan...@gmx.net wrote: Hi there, Hey # This will initialize the internationalization # capabilities of glib (glib/gi18n.h) and gettext IT_PROG_INTLTOOL([0.41.0]) AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.18.1]) AM_GNU_GETTEXT([external]) and in autogen.sh i only call autoreconf -ivs Yeah this is correct. In general avoid the use of AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT. Check [1] for more info If you want to use intltool, you have 2 options: remove the gettext macros or keep them and add something like this to your autogen.sh: autopoint --force AUTOPOINT='intltoolize --automake --copy' autoreconf -ivs Regards [1] http://blogs.gnome.org/jjardon/2010/10/08/use-upstream-gettext-instead-the-glib-one/ -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
GTK+ 2.24.9 released
GTK+ 2.24.9 is now available for download at: ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.24/ http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.24/ 84204bf24cac739fd979943127e7b29cb46b1017684aa24dce630faa01bcb61d gtk+-2.24.9.tar.xz This is a bug fix release in the stable 2.24 series. GTK+ is a multi-platform toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces. Offering a complete set of widgets, GTK+ is suitable for projects ranging from small one-off tools to complete application suites. GTK+ has been designed from the ground up to support a range of languages, not only C/C++. Using GTK+ from languages such as Perl and Python (especially in combination with the Glade GUI builder) provides an effective method of rapid application development. GTK+ is free software and part of the GNU Project. However, the licensing terms for GTK+, the GNU LGPL, allow it to be used by all developers, including those developing proprietary software, without any license fees or royalties. Overview of Changes from GTK+ 2.24.8 to 2.24.9 = * Implement the editing-canceled property in GtkCellEditableEventBox * Backport GtkScale fixes * Several fixes in the MS-Windows theme * quartz: fix a race condition when waking up the CGRunLoop * Several build fixes: - Add gmodule-2.0 dependency for gtk-query-immodules-2.0 - introspection: Fix srcdir != builddir builds * Bug fixed: 663856 - Make option-foo accelerators use the right symbol 664238 - GTK apps crash when dragging something 665011 - Fix gtk-demo drawingarea example 665013 - Fix 16bit pixmaps 662814 - Don't print a g_warning() when GtkRecentManager can't find a file 620240 - Fix problems with DND on some X servers 629878 - Use the right icon-name for missing images 543520 - Set cups Custom print options correctly 639455 - Implement the editing-canceled property in GtkCellEditableEventBox 667458 - introspection: Fix srcdir != builddir builds Thanks to our contributors: Javier Jardón Benjamin Otte Stefan Sauer Michael Natterer Benjamin Berg Carlos Garcia Campos Stefan Sauer Ryan Lortie Federico Mena Quintero Dieter Verfaillie Alexander Larsson Matthias Clasen Florian Müllner John Ralls Michael Natterer Cosimo Cecchi January 24, 2012 Javier Jardón ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
GTK+ 2.24.9 released
GTK+ 2.24.9 is now available for download at: ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.24/ http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.24/ 84204bf24cac739fd979943127e7b29cb46b1017684aa24dce630faa01bcb61d gtk+-2.24.9.tar.xz This is a bug fix release in the stable 2.24 series. GTK+ is a multi-platform toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces. Offering a complete set of widgets, GTK+ is suitable for projects ranging from small one-off tools to complete application suites. GTK+ has been designed from the ground up to support a range of languages, not only C/C++. Using GTK+ from languages such as Perl and Python (especially in combination with the Glade GUI builder) provides an effective method of rapid application development. GTK+ is free software and part of the GNU Project. However, the licensing terms for GTK+, the GNU LGPL, allow it to be used by all developers, including those developing proprietary software, without any license fees or royalties. Overview of Changes from GTK+ 2.24.8 to 2.24.9 = * Implement the editing-canceled property in GtkCellEditableEventBox * Backport GtkScale fixes * Several fixes in the MS-Windows theme * quartz: fix a race condition when waking up the CGRunLoop * Several build fixes: - Add gmodule-2.0 dependency for gtk-query-immodules-2.0 - introspection: Fix srcdir != builddir builds * Bug fixed: 663856 - Make option-foo accelerators use the right symbol 664238 - GTK apps crash when dragging something 665011 - Fix gtk-demo drawingarea example 665013 - Fix 16bit pixmaps 662814 - Don't print a g_warning() when GtkRecentManager can't find a file 620240 - Fix problems with DND on some X servers 629878 - Use the right icon-name for missing images 543520 - Set cups Custom print options correctly 639455 - Implement the editing-canceled property in GtkCellEditableEventBox 667458 - introspection: Fix srcdir != builddir builds Thanks to our contributors: Javier Jardón Benjamin Otte Stefan Sauer Michael Natterer Benjamin Berg Carlos Garcia Campos Stefan Sauer Ryan Lortie Federico Mena Quintero Dieter Verfaillie Alexander Larsson Matthias Clasen Florian Müllner John Ralls Michael Natterer Cosimo Cecchi January 24, 2012 Javier Jardón ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
GTK+ 2.24.9 released
GTK+ 2.24.9 is now available for download at: ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.24/ http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.24/ 84204bf24cac739fd979943127e7b29cb46b1017684aa24dce630faa01bcb61d gtk+-2.24.9.tar.xz This is a bug fix release in the stable 2.24 series. GTK+ is a multi-platform toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces. Offering a complete set of widgets, GTK+ is suitable for projects ranging from small one-off tools to complete application suites. GTK+ has been designed from the ground up to support a range of languages, not only C/C++. Using GTK+ from languages such as Perl and Python (especially in combination with the Glade GUI builder) provides an effective method of rapid application development. GTK+ is free software and part of the GNU Project. However, the licensing terms for GTK+, the GNU LGPL, allow it to be used by all developers, including those developing proprietary software, without any license fees or royalties. Overview of Changes from GTK+ 2.24.8 to 2.24.9 = * Implement the editing-canceled property in GtkCellEditableEventBox * Backport GtkScale fixes * Several fixes in the MS-Windows theme * quartz: fix a race condition when waking up the CGRunLoop * Several build fixes: - Add gmodule-2.0 dependency for gtk-query-immodules-2.0 - introspection: Fix srcdir != builddir builds * Bug fixed: 663856 - Make option-foo accelerators use the right symbol 664238 - GTK apps crash when dragging something 665011 - Fix gtk-demo drawingarea example 665013 - Fix 16bit pixmaps 662814 - Don't print a g_warning() when GtkRecentManager can't find a file 620240 - Fix problems with DND on some X servers 629878 - Use the right icon-name for missing images 543520 - Set cups Custom print options correctly 639455 - Implement the editing-canceled property in GtkCellEditableEventBox 667458 - introspection: Fix srcdir != builddir builds Thanks to our contributors: Javier Jardón Benjamin Otte Stefan Sauer Michael Natterer Benjamin Berg Carlos Garcia Campos Stefan Sauer Ryan Lortie Federico Mena Quintero Dieter Verfaillie Alexander Larsson Matthias Clasen Florian Müllner John Ralls Michael Natterer Cosimo Cecchi January 24, 2012 Javier Jardón ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Is GTK+ 3.x 2x slower than GTK+ 2.x?
On 23 July 2011 21:30, Jakub Misak jmi...@centrum.cz wrote: Is GTK+ 3.x 2x slower than GTK+ 2.x? Hello, Hello Jakub, So I made a (very) simple and stupid benchmark that tests a couple of basic things in a loop, to see how the two GTK+ versions compare. If you're interested, you can download it here: http://www.fileupyours.com/files/310686/perftest.tar.gz So my question is - is there something in GTK+ 3.0 that could possibly cause such a dramatic slowdown compared to 2.24? Thanks for you work here. Could you run the test again against the current stable GTK+ version? (GTK+ 3.2) Some optimization work has been done in that release. Regards -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: GTK and OSX: a call to sanity
On 7 September 2011 15:26, Federico Mena Quintero feder...@gnome.org wrote: As to what is in Bugzilla, is there a quick way to find all the Quartz bugs to speed up their review? (Or are those patches already in the quartz-integration branch? I didn't look at individual commits to see if they had bug numbers.) All quartz bugs: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED;bug_status=REOPENED;bug_status=NEEDINFO;component=quartz;product=gtk%2B with patches: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced;field0-0-0=attachments.ispatch;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED;bug_status=REOPENED;bug_status=NEEDINFO;type0-0-0=equals;value0-0-0=1;component=quartz;product=gtk%2B Regards, -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: GTK and OSX: a call to sanity
2011/9/7 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org: On 7 September 2011 15:26, Federico Mena Quintero feder...@gnome.org wrote: As to what is in Bugzilla, is there a quick way to find all the Quartz bugs to speed up their review? (Or are those patches already in the quartz-integration branch? I didn't look at individual commits to see if they had bug numbers.) I just added a table with links to gtk/glib/pango MacOS bugs in the wiki page [1] If you think any other query would be useful let me know. Regards [1] https://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/OSX -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Compilation of the GTK+ stack on Windows using Visual C++
On 19 August 2011 10:03, Fan Chun-wei fanc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote: Hi List, I have (finally) managed to write up some instructions[1] to build the GTK+ stack with a stock installation of Visual C++ 2008/2010 from scratch. The instructions can be found at [1]. ... [1]: https://live.gnome.org/MSVCCompilationOfGTKStack Hello Fan Chun-wei, thanks for your work Could you move that page to https://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/Win32/MSVCCompilationOfGTKStack and add a link to https://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/Win32/ ? Thanks! -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: No Pascal in the Gtk bindings list?
On 4 August 2011 14:21, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Please add Pascal in the Gtk bindings page: http://www.gtk.org/language-bindings.php Done, thanks for noticing. Regards, -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: how to migrate theme from gtk+-2.0 to gtk+-3.0
On 23 June 2011 13:55, sunil agrawal sunil.agrawa...@gmail.com wrote: In gtk+-2.0, I have created a pixman based theme. This theme will replace stock images and other widgets images which I mentioned in my gtkrc file. Now I want to migrate to gtk+-3.0. I tried to parse my gtkrc file but it did not work out. Is there any way to achieve the same theme in gtk+-3.0 ( using css file or using any other method), Please suggest. Take a look to the migration guide: [1] [1] http://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/ch25s02.html#gtk-migrating-GtkStyleContext -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: GtkStatusbar and DGSEAL_ENABLE
On 9 April 2011 19:44, Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt wrote: Hi there, Hello Carlos, Perhaps we could have a function: label = gtk_statusbar_get_label (GTK_STATUSBAR (statusbar)); This way GTK developers could futurely change the inner workings of GtkStatusbar without affecting user code that needs access to the Label. Could you comment in this bug? [1] Thanks [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594535 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: cross-compiling glib-1.2
On 29 March 2011 13:14, joey kuo ourj...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Hello, I'm currently trying to cross-compile gtk1.2.5 for mips-linux 4.3. Only curious, why not using GTK+3 instead GTK+1? -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Gtk+ 3.0 and MS Windows
On 28 March 2011 06:43, Mikhail Titov m...@gmx.us wrote: I don't have much spare time, but I'll try to summarize what should be done to utilize cross-compiled binaries (like from OpenSUSE) to build stuff using MS VC++. I guess it would be substantial time saver not to manually build dependencies under MS Windows. Hey Mikhail, Feel free to use the wiki page [1] for this, so It can be useful for other people in the future. [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/Win32/ -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: gtk+ win32 binaries
On 25 March 2011 23:37, Pedro Santos p_daniel_san...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, Since the past six months I've actively used gtk+ and I noticed some lag between the source release and win32 binary builds. Because of this, I've to build gtk+ myself in order to use the most recent distribution. So, I'm wondering if I can give you some help building win32 binaries, in order to reduce this lag. I use MinGW to build my win32 binaries. I haven't tried to build win64 binaries but I could do some tests and possibly contribute with win64 too. Please let me know if I could help. Pardon me if I'm contacting in the wrong place. If this is the case please point me in the right direction. Hello Pedro, Thanks a lot for your help! All the resources about the windows backend development are here [1] Feel free to improve it if you want. The former windows maintainer doesnt have time anymore [2] to do the windows binaries, so any help is very welcomed Regards [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/Win32 [2] http://tml-blog.blogspot.com/2011/03/gtk-on-windows-i-am-not-really-doing-it.html -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: gtk3 migrating document and drawing
On 13 February 2011 18:13, Allin Cottrell cottr...@wfu.edu wrote: It seems that the section of the gtk-migrating-2-to-3 doc as distributed with gtk 3.0.0 is not up to date with the state of the drawing code in the release. For example, it still talks about using pixmaps in the replacement code sections. This is an area where it would be very helpful to have up-to-date and precise documentation. Hello Allin, Where exactly do you see this? I can only see how to port a pixmap to a non-pixmap code in the porting guide Could you fill a bug about this in our bugzilla? [1] Thanks, [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=gtk+ -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: gtk-builder-convert
On 8 February 2011 00:36, Stefano Facchini stefano.facch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have gtk 2.99.4 built from git using the gnome-shell building script. Now I'm trying to build gnome-terminal from git, with the configure option --with-gtk=3.0 but it fails because it seems to require the newer version of the script gtk-builder-convert (accepting the option --target-version=3.0). Where can I find it? I only have the gtk2 version and my gtk3 build does not include it. This is because gtk-builder-convert was dropped from GTK+3 I guess the gnome-terminal code should be patched to not use gtk-builder-convert in build time Regards -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Gobject-Introspection and CMPH
On 16 December 2010 17:07, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: But since you bring it up, what is the official policy? Is it C89? Is it published somewhere? For GTK+, we're generally avoiding C++ comments, since they cause problems for the compilers that are used on win32. What other non-C89 features do you have in mind ? But they *are* used in gtk3 right now... I dont think so. Where are they used? Regards -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: [pygtk] PyGtk and gtk-3.0 compatibility
2010/11/8 Stephen Langer stephen.lan...@nist.gov: Hi. I'm Alice, and I have no idea what you're talking about. I'm heavily invested in PyGTK2 in a long-term project. As far as I can tell, PyGObject is a low level library that doesn't serve the same purpose as PyGTK at all. What's the relationship between the new PyGObject and the old? What kind of porting do I have to look forward to, and on what time scale? With PyGObject (since version 2.26) you can access any library with GObject Introspection support, for example GTK+. A complete list here: [1] More info in the project home page: [2] I think the community as a whole would be FAR better served by having not just better PyGObject code, but better documentation for PyGObject (including porting HOWTOs). Yes, please. There are some tips here: [3] Also, there is a GnomeGoal to port applications from PyGTK to PyGObject here: [4] Thanks, Steve (not really Alice) Regards [1] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AddGObjectIntrospectionSupport [2] http://live.gnome.org/PyGObject [3] http://live.gnome.org/PyGObject/IntrospectionPorting [4] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PythonIntrospectionPorting -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Language Bindings Update for Website
Hello all, 2010/10/25 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com: On 25/10/10 19:45, Murray Cumming wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 09:36 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: That shows vala and Javascript as an Official GNOME Binding, presumably meaning an official GNOME Platform Binding. But they are not: http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone/Bindings I will change the officially gnome part on the site unless there are any objections? I do not know how is the situation with the moduleset reorganization, but I think JavaScript is a official binding as seed is already part of the bindings moduleset [1] and gjs was accepted in the last cycle [2] About Vala is already a external dependency [3], but I'm not very sure if It's enough. Regards [1] http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone/Bindings [2] http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone/Desktop [3] http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNinetyone/ExternalDependencies -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Language Bindings Update for Website
2010/10/25 Arnaud Charlet char...@adacore.com: For anyone else wanting to update their language binding support listed on the site, please let me know so we can update them accordingly. ¹ http://www.gtk.org/language-bindings.html GtkAda (Ada binding) supports 2.22 (and below). What do you mean by supports? Can I access to new API added in GTK+ 2.18 ( like GtkSpinner ) from a Ada program? -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: GTK3 breakage
El día 27 de septiembre de 2010 00:53, Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com escribió: Hi, Hello, 2010/9/26 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org: It returns a pointer to a GObject now Shouldn't it just return a GtkAdjustment* ? returning GtkObject was some weird legacy thing. Patches filled here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630731 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Take part in gkt+ development
2010/9/22 Alexander Kuleshov kuleshovm...@gmail.com: Hello list, Hello Alexander, First of all let me introduce myself. My name is Alexander Kuleshov. Now I m student, programmer. I have some expirience in C/gtk+ programming (i took part in Google summer of Code in this year) And I want to take part in gtk+/glib development. Good to know! :) 1) If i write patch, where must i send it? File it to Glib [1] or GTK+ [2] bugzilla 2) What version of gtk+, must i use for development? From git? The current development focus is the master branch (future GTK+3) Regards. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=glib [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gtk%2B -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Missing icons in 2.21.8
2010/9/16 Bernd Eggink mono...@sudrala.de: Hi all, after an update from 2.21.7 to 2.21.8 I get these messages when starting Firefox: -- (firefox-bin:4965): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading theme icon 'gtk-go-back-ltr' for stock: Icon 'gtk-go-back-ltr' not present in theme (firefox-bin:4965): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (firefox-bin:4965): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_default_render_icon: assertion `base_pixbuf != NULL' failed (firefox-bin:4965): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_style_render_icon: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (firefox-bin:4965): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed -- And similar for 'gtk-go-forward-ltr'. Is it a bug or am I missing something? Yeah, It'a probably a bug after the changes in the stock icons. Please, file a bug report -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Update gtk2hs (Haskell binding to GTK+) information!
2010/9/11 Andy Stewart lazycat.mana...@gmail.com: I'm a developer of gtk2hs (Haskell binding to GTK+), i have update all GTK+2.20 APIs in gtk2hs, any administrator help me update page http://www.gtk.org/language-bindings.html ? Done. Next time try to file a bug in GTK+ bugzilla, website component; so this do not get lost. Thanks a lot! -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
GTK+ policy (was RE:rendering-cleanup-next)
2010/9/12 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com: We don't have a written-down policy, beyond 'fit in locally'. But I have become increasingly annoyed by trailing whitespace and mixed-in tabs, since they do show up in my editor nowadays. So maybe we should agree on a policy and put it in writing for 3.0. As a start point, we have an informal policy here: [1] [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/BestPractices#Coding_Style -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Gtk DirectFB backend
2010/8/25 John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com: For Google, and those that find this thread brings bad news, I stumbled across a developers branch that gets Gtk+-2.20 working with DirectFB again. [1] http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2010-May/005704.html [2] http://git.potipota.net/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/gtk+/log/?h=2.20-directfb-fixes I wonder why these patches were not submitted upstream -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Website proposal for usability
2010/8/12 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com: I like some of the proposed changes here. There are some other things that I think need changing (which were there before) such as the NEWS on the main page. It just doesn't get updated enough. I'd suggest to use the identi.ca [1] / twitter [2] acount for more up-to date info. Maybe in a separate section in the main page? BTW, Thanks for your work on this Devin. [1] http://identi.ca/gtktoolkit/ [2] http://twitter.com/GTKtoolkit -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Porting a GTK 1.x application to current version
2010/7/11 Fabian Schreyer fabianschre...@gmail.com: Hi there, I have to port an old GTK 1.x application from around 2000 to a current version. The goal is simply making it work on the current version of Ubuntu. So I searched Google for a general porting guide, but was unable to find anything useful, only a hint that there was one around in 2001. I was finally able to locate this old guid via archive.org, but I'm unsure, if it still applies to current versions of GTK+. Does anyone know if there is a more recent guide on the net, or if the old one from archive.org is still usable? Take a look here: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/2.21/migrating.html -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: GTK+ 2.21.5 released
2010/7/12 Kevin DeKorte kdeko...@gmail.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/12/2010 12:02 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: GTK+ 2.21.5 is now available for download at: * Deprecations: - GtkWindow::allow-grow and ::allow-shrink properties Why are these properties being depreciated? Is there another way of doing this? This properties are quite useful for some applications and I recently converted an application to use this properties due to other GTK options being taken away. (gtk_window_set_policy). Use GtkWindow::resize instead -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: Anyone for CMake?
2010/6/26 John Emmas john...@tiscali.co.uk: I just wondered if there's ever been any discussion in the *nix community about moving away from Autoconf/Automake in favour of CMake? I guess this topic must have come up several times already, so what were considered to be the pros and cons? At first glance, CMake seems to be a lot more modern and certainly a lot friendlier towards the other major platforms, as well as *nix. Some time ago I creted this page with some info about projects using cmake/scons/waf in GTK+/GNOME community: [1] Maybe It's on your interest. Regards [1] http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/NewBuildSystem -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: Why GtkFontSelectionDialog doesn't implements GtkFontSelection?
010/6/29 Tadej Borovšak tadeb...@gmail.com: There has been some work going on to bring font chooser widgets into 21st century, but nothing has come out of that yet (and I lost the link to the page with some mockups). This is the link: [1] [1] http://live.gnome.org/Design/GTKFontDialog/MockupSet1 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: [PATCH] gdk/gdkpixmap.[ch]: state constness of `data` in create pixmap routines
2010/6/22 Ben Stewart ben.stewart+gtk...@tucuxi.org: Hi all, The attached patch file resolves an issue where const char * data cannot be passed to the GDK create pixmap from XPM routines. Apologies in advance if this is not the correct venue to submit a patch - this is the first one I have submitted to the GTK+ project. Hello Ben, Could you submit the patch to GTK+ bugzilla [1] so It can't be lost? Also, I'd suggest you to use the git format-patch format for the patch [2] Regards, [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gtk+ [2]http://live.gnome.org/Git/Developers#Contributing_patches -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: C#/Mono and GNOME 3.0
2010/6/17 Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com: Mono's Gtk+, as far as I know, requires an older Gtk+ 2.10 or 2.14 based for Gtk#, Is this online with GNOME/GTK+ 3.0? Any Gtk# based application will be an exception? Reading their page: [1], seems that they plan to switch to GTK+3 in the next release. Or Mono will use GObject Introspection in order to get updated automatically? Mono GAPI [2] could replace its gapi2-parser by using GOject-Introspection. [1] http://www.mono-project.com/GtkSharpPlan [2] http://www.mono-project.com/GAPI -- Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación de grano en grano, se hace la arena (R) (en trámite, pero para los cuates: LIBRE) ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: [patch] stray commas
2010/6/5 Mark Brand mabr...@mabrand.nl: Hi, File gio/gioenums.h b/gio/gioenums.h in glib-2.25.7.tar.bz2 has some stray commas at the end of enums that gcc 4.5 does not like. This patch removes them. Hey Mark, thanks for your patch but this issue was already fixed: http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=07b5cee2a8273d7fdd20371b5494ecd320c3cd1c Regards, -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: [PATCH] gdk/gdkwindow.c: fix a typo in gdk_window_set_device_cursor().
2010/5/26 Christian Beier dontm...@freeshell.org: Hi there, the attached simple patch fixes a typo in gdk_window_set_device_cursor(). Applies against master. Pushed, thanks a lot. Please, try to use bugzilla [1] next time so the patch don't get lost. Regards [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gtk%2B -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: GtkAdjustment woes
2010/5/15 Tadej Borovšak tadeb...@gmail.com: Hi all. Hey Tadej, One thing is clamping of GtkAdjustment::value. Currently, value is clamped between values of GtkAdjustment::lower and GtkAdjustment::upper, while API documentation states that value is clamped between GtkAdjustment::lower and GtkAdjustment::upper - GtkAdjustment::page-size. This inconsistency has been already fixed once, but because this change broke many applications, fix has been reverted and postponed until GTK+-3. I think now would be a good time to fix this (again) in git master. I filled bug #619474 [1] with a patch to use the correct (documented) behaviour. Next thing on the list are gtk_adjustment_changed() and gtk_adjustment_value_changed() functions. They are used to emit GtkAdjustment::changed and GtkAdjustment::value-changed signals respectively after direct modification of GtkAdjustment's fields. Since all of the public fields of GtkAdjustment are GSEALed now, those two functions are redundant now and should probably be marked as deprecated in GTK+-2.22 and removed from GTK+-3. I think that makes sense, any other opinnions? [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619474 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: libgnomecanvas
2010/5/1 John Emmas john...@tiscali.co.uk: Is this an appropriate forum for asking questions about libgnomecanvas or does it have its own separate mailing list? Hello John, note that GnomeCanvas is deprecated, maybe you want to use GooCanvas [1] instead. Also, this page has info about some canvas libraries [2] [1] http://live.gnome.org/GooCanvas [2] http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley/CanvasOverview -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: GtkWidget documentation
2010/4/10 Magnus Hjorth magnus.i.hjo...@gmail.com: Hi, The GTK+ documentaion for gtk_widget_set_has_window says that widgets that create their own windows must in their init function call gtk_widget_set_has_window with has_window=TRUE. However, it looks like in reality windowed is default and it's instead windowless widgets that must call gtk_widget_set_has_window with has_window=FALSE in their init functions. I made a simple patch correcting this, plus filled in some signal documentation. Hello Magnus, submitted to bugzilla GTK+ here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615474 Thank you for the patch -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB
2010/4/8 Vasily Khoruzhick anars...@gmail.com: Hi, As you may know, DirectFB backend of gtk+ in recent versions is heavily broken, and I want to know if anyone working on fixing DirectFB backend :) I was able to fix crash by applying 2 patches (attached) from André Draszik, and now simple gtk apps works, but that's not enough for complete gtk-demo - it just draws white window. Are these patches already submitted to GTK+ Bugzilla [1]? If not, could you attach them to a new bug report? Thank you. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gtk%2B -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Crash when starting my application using gtk 2.20 and directfb 1.4.3
2010/3/25 IMS ims77@gmail.com: Hello, Hello I have corrected my problem to compile my embedded application using the last version of gtk (2.20.0) I have used the patch here : https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605185 Just commmited this fix to master And using the same principle I added these lines to be able to compile (using direct-fb 1.4.3) : Could you try again and send any possible bug/patch to the bugzilla [1]? Thank you very much. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gtk%2B -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...
2010/3/25 kcir...@lavabit.com: Out of curiosity, how is Win32 support? I know that the MS-Windows theme wasn't working with 2.18 (client-side windows support needed to be added), and that on GTK.org it said that 2.16 was in a way more stable than 2.18 on the Win32 platform. Has this changed? I see that in the release notes it says XP themes have been disabled since they don't work but I'm not sure if that has anything to do with the MS-Windows theme or not. There are still some bugs related with csw (Client Side Windows). Take a look here [1] Also, you have more generic info here [2] [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr;query_format=advanced;status_whiteboard=csw;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED;bug_status=REOPENED;bug_status=NEEDINFO;component=win32;product=gtk%2B [2] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/Win32 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: When deprecating, always say what the replacement is.
2010/2/23 Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com: When we deprecate API, please remember to document what the replacement is. People forget this quite often. A small recent example that doesn't do this: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk +/commit/?id=bb1824c131f247c2ef64f3c5f8b9ffe3885c9d90 Indeed, the info about the replacements is on the deprecated functions/macros documentation (inline comments ;)): http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/diff/gtk/gtkwidget.h?id=bb1824c131f247c2ef64f3c5f8b9ffe3885c9d90 Best Regards, -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Identi.ca and twitter GTK+ accounts
Hello all, An identi.ca [1] and twitter [2] accounts have been created. The account is managed by aruiz (Alberto Ruiz) and me, but if any GTK+ devel want to have permissions, please tell us. Stay tunned! [1] http://identi.ca/gtktoolkit [2] http://twitter.com/gtktoolkit -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Introduction
2010/2/22 Greg Sieranski g...@signbit.org: Hi guys, Hello Greg, I currently work on the fedora website and marketing projects. I would love to be able to help out with gtk+ development for gnome. I am very experienced in c, c++, python. I am a huge fan of open source and love to contribute any way I can. Please let me know how I may be of any assistance. Great! :) Take a look here [1] for some GTK+ tasks and here [2] for GTK+ 3 stuff. If you are interested in bug triaging, you can use the links of this [4] page for specific kind of bugs (Search for trivial bugs with unreviewed patches would be a good start ;)) Regards, [1] http://live.gnome.org/GtkTasks [2] http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/3.0/Tasks [3] http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/BugzillaLinks -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: GtkAssistant get nth page and GtkAssistant get current page APIs
2010/2/16 dheeraj reddy sunsetim...@gmail.com: Hello I am facing problems using these APIs. on x11 1) gtk_assistant_get_nth_page (). it is given to pass -1 to get the last page. but when tried it returns NULL. Bug reported here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610141 2) gtk_assistant_set_current_page (). it is given If negative, the last page will be used. but when negative page_num is passed the application crashes. Bug reported here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610184 Thanks to Tadej for the reports Regards -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Last call for missing accessors
2010/2/9 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com: I need to do a GTK+ release tomorrow, and it realistically has to be API frozen to make Gnome 2.30. So, if any of the GTK3 crowd want to step forward and get some of the important missing accessors in, tonight would be a good time to do it... For the record, you can see here [1] the status of this. After doing some patches for USEGSEAL GnomeGoal [2], I think the most important ones are: - GTK_WIDGET_REALIZED(), GTK_WIDGET_MAPPED() [3] - GtkTextView GtkEntry -need_im_reset [4] (in progress) There are already patches for the two remaining GTK_WIDGET_* macros here [5], Is this aproach not valid? Also, Do somebody know the status of the GtkStyle [6] and GtkRcStyle [7] sealings? Or the plan is switch to a new style system? Best Regards, [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/3.0/PendingSealings [2] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/UseGseal [3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69872 [4] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163251 [5] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69872#c3 [6] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541136 [7] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540392 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: bug in g_content_type_guess
2010/2/6 Shixin Zeng zeng.shi...@gmail.com:
from http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/tree/gio/gcontenttype.c
we have the definition for this function as below, where
*result_uncertain is never assigned.
char *
g_content_type_guess (const char *filename,
const guchar *data,
gsize data_size,
gboolean *result_uncertain)
{
char *basename;
char *type;
char *dot;
type = NULL;
if (filename)
{
basename = g_path_get_basename (filename);
dot = strrchr (basename, '.');
if (dot)
type = g_strdup (dot);
g_free (basename);
}
if (type)
return type;
if (data looks_like_text (data, data_size))
return g_strdup (.txt);
return g_strdup (*);
}
Best Regards
Shixin Zeng
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Hello,
bug report created here:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609143
Thanks,
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: State of GTK3 (especially the theme api)
2010/2/1 Clemens Eisserer linuxhi...@gmail.com: Hi, Hello Clemens Does anybody know whats the state of GTK3? Whats the estimated release date? I am especially interested in what the theme api looks like? A gtk-2-90 branch already exist in gnome git [1]. The work was started to remove all deprecated code, patches welcomed to help in this or other tasks, take a look here: [2] All wiki pages I found were quite outdate :-( Did you see [3] ? I ask because about 2 years ago I proposed changes to GTK's theme api (bug 515600) allowing non-gtk applications (like FireFox and Java) to efficiently use it, and was told I should wait for GTK-3. That was 2 years ago and it still doesn't look like GTK3 is arround the corner. The changes were completly backward-compatible. I think you may be interested in project monet [4] Thank you in advance, Clemens Best Regards, [1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+?h=gtk-2-90 [2] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/3.0/Tasks [3] http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/3.0/ [4] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeArt/Monet -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
GTK+3: Help with latest needed accessors
Hello, as you already know, one of the major goals of future GTK+ releases is seal all public structure fields and use accessor functions instead direct access to these properties [1] There is a tracker bug for missing accessors functions here [2]. After doing some patches for various GTK+ apps [3], I think the most important missing accessors are - GTK_WIDGET_REALIZED(), GTK_WIDGET_MAPPED() ( see bug [4] ) (Also, is necessary an accessor for GTK_WIDGET_RC_STYLE() ?) - GtkTextView-need_im_reset ( see bug [5] ) Also, if someone knows the status of the GtkStyle [6] and GtkRcStyle [7] sealings, please comment here. I think that If we can solve the accessor functions for these 3 cases, most of the GTK+ apps can be compiled with GSEAL_ENABLED and be ready for GTK+3 transition. Regards [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/3.0/Tasks#P1 [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597610 [3] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/UseGseal [4] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69872 [5] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163251 [6] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541136 [7] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540392 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Re: compile error in compiling gtk+2.18
2009/12/24 Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi: Is there any doc to explain the libs and versions that the gtk+ needed? 1) configure.in, 2) the .spec files in various RPM-based distros, 3) the corresponding files in DEB-based distros. Maybe a mention in the documentation would be good. I think [1] would be the correct place. What do you think? Regards, [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-building.html -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Re: compile error in compiling gtk+2.18
El día 26 de diciembre de 2009 16:21, Javier Jardón javierjc1...@gmail.com escribió: 2009/12/24 Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi: Is there any doc to explain the libs and versions that the gtk+ needed? 1) configure.in, 2) the .spec files in various RPM-based distros, 3) the corresponding files in DEB-based distros. Maybe a mention in the documentation would be good. I think [1] would be the correct place. If anyone interested, just filled a patch here [1] Regards [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605493 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Native/Extended layout
2009/12/14 Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de: Hi everybody! You potentially know that GTK+ has some issues when it comes to correctly assign space to widgets if the widgets don't have a fixed size. In 2007, Mathias Hasselmann worked on this issues in a summer of code project (see the extended-layout branch). You will find the original discussion here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101968 And for the more recent ideas here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104188 I finally created the native-layout branch that sums up the patches of the second bug report. The original extended-layout branch is so far behind recent development that merging is ends up in a rewrite more or less and Behdad/Havoc expressed that they don't like the implementation used. Hello Johannes, thank you for your work on this. I've also update the roadmap with all the new info [1]. Feel free to improve it if you want ;) Regards [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/Roadmap -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Subclassing in Gtk+ 3.0
2009/12/8 A. Walton awal...@gnome.org: 2009/12/8 David Nečas y...@physics.muni.cz: On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:17:40PM -0200, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: 2009/12/7 David Nečas y...@physics.muni.cz: Hello, how is subclassing intended to work in Gtk+ 3.0? * GSEAL() bridges the gap between 2.9x.x and 3.0 by making it easier to port and see where we're missing accessors. * Widgets are patched during the 3.0 ABI break so their currently public struct members are moved to GtkFooPrivate. * g_type_class_add_private() the GtkFooPrivate struct to prevent some fragmentation. * Add a GtkFooPrivate* to the object's public struct, populate it during gtk_foo_init() with a single G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_PRIVATE() call to speed up access and prevent duplicate GtkFooPrivate *priv = G_TYPE_INSTANCE_... lines. + roughly as fast as before, low memory overhead + code is future-proof and much easier to maintain with proper encapsulation - accessors are now mandatory, even for subclasses - code's a bit more ugly (when implementing a widget, 'widget-foo' is now 'widget-priv-foo'). AFAIK this is the 'state of the art' way to write new GObjects, and it's been the way I've been coding for a while (out of habit). I believe this is also the way that Vala currently outputs objects. Yes, this is the actual approach. FYI, here an example of migration in the 2.90 branch: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+/commit/?h=gtk-2-90id=3451c804c9145cc9f598e6bff0fd8c6aac79923f Regards -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)
2009/12/4 Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt: 3) However GtkGlExt is not GTK-3.0 ready, because it cannot be compiled with SEAL_ENABLE and SINGLE_INCLUDES... Bug and patch filled upstream for SINGLE_INCLUDES issue: [1] Also, I've found some interesting threads about this topic here [2] (Sept 2003) and here [3] (Jan 2004). There was a initial RFC here: [4], attached in the bug [5] I posted in the previous mail. Regards. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603829 [2] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2003-September/msg00220.html [3] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2004-January/msg00169.html [4] http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=22045 [5] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119189 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)
Hello Carlos, 2009/12/3 Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt: That's why I asked in the first message of this thread, what are the plans regarding GtkGLExt. To the best of my knowledge, GtkGLExt is still the official way to bridge GTK and OpenGL: http://gtkglext.sourceforge.net/ are there plans to integrate this via Cairo and discard GtkGLExt? that was mentioned in this list years ago... OpenGL integration into GTK+ is part of project Ridley [1]. Here the bug report: [2] The project was recently moved to gnome git too [3] and seems to be quite active. [1] http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119189 [3] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkglext-list/2009-October/msg5.html -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: Gtk 3.0
2009/12/1 Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt: Dear all, Hello Carlos 1) My app is currently compiling without warnings, with Gtk 2.18.3 I believe (Ubuntu 9.10), at the compilation level: CFLAGS = -g -O3 -Wall -ansi override CFLAGS += -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED \ -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED \ -DGDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED \ -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED This means that my app is (mostly) ready for Gtk 3.0? You should try to compile your application with: make CFLAGS+=-DGSEAL_ENABLE take a look here [1] for more info. Regards [1] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/UseGseal -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Kinetic scrolling (was Minutes of the GTK+ Team Meeting - 2009-11-27)
2009/11/25 alex acas...@igalia.com: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:13:20PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: [...] 4. Implement finger and kinetic scrolling [jjardon] - Midori has a finger/kinetic scrolled window implementation - Hildon has one as well - OpenMoko had one - would it make sense to port the feature to GtkScrolledWindow when :gtk-touchscreen-mode is set to TRUE? - issue: event delivery to children requires subclassing to override current default behaviour of gtk+ widgets The main issues now: - Selection/dragging vs scrolling (touchscreen mode?, more complex widgets or subclassing) - Animations with timeouts in gtk are not that good (check Owen posts about that), this is something to discuss about the library - Embedding finger scroll widgets inside each other? - Double events in the callbacks, original and reinjection if widgets do not deal with them. I do not think this solution is a clean option, we should add clean support for this event handling, maybe using top-down widget detection in csw or adding new specific gdk event or something like that. We could check how to do that. FYI, This is what was discussed in the meeting: ( see the complete log here: [1]) jjardon kinetic bug number: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601923 jjardon kalikianatoli added support for this in midori recently, maybe this stuff could be added to gtk+ shaunm is this the same kind of widget as HildonPannableArea? i.e. you can grab anywhere inside it to flick? kalikianatoli ebassi, I would wonder if it makes sense to support that in scrolled window itself ebassi kalikianatoli: well, yeah: if we decided to get it in gtk+ I'd definitely vote for adding the feature to ScrolledWindow kalikianatoli shaunm, yep, and you can choose whether it should just drag, or also move further shaunm ok, so one of the quirks I noticed is that other widgets needed to be modified/subclassed so as not to consume the drags in order to work correctly inside a pannable area shaunm because events in gtk are handled innermost-first shaunm at least in hildon. do other implementations have a less hacky way around this? kalikianatoli shaunm, Probably a property would solve this. To say whether it should select or drag shaunm yeah, I'm kind of wondering if gtk could have a cleaner way for parents to intercept events, without relying on the good faith of child widgets shaunm maybe a two-pass event propagation: top down and back up ebassi shaunm: just like clutter ;-) ebassi the first pass is: top-level to innermost child; the second pass is: innermost child to top-level ebassi so the kinetic scroller would intercept the events before they reach the children kalikianatoli although then you can't know if the child had a better idea of how to treat the situation ebassi it would imply adding a new event and doing the event chain in reverse order; then, if nothing returned TRUE, continue with the current behaviour ebassi kalikianatoli: there are always side effects :-) kalikianatoli a bit like going from not good to not good either :) ebassi you could handle the event and let it through anyway kalikianatoli but I definitely recall more than once where that would have been useful kalikianatoli so I would like to follow the idea if it can be done ebassi we added that behavioir exactly after doing the finger scrolling window on openmoko :-) [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/Meetings?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=20091124.txt -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Links to help glib/gtk+ devels and contributors
Hello all, I've created this page [1] with links to bugzilla gtk+/glib bugs. Maybe It's useful for some gtk+/glib developers or contributors. I think that It could improve the patch review process a bit: * You have a quick look of the bugs targeted for the next gtk+/glib release * People interested on one area (performance, quartz/win32 ports...) have a direct link to their bugs. * Official gtk+ devels could take a look at reviewed patches to accept or reject them. * New contributors could take a look at trivial bugs or documentation bugs. Or need-work bugs to improve them. * ...etc I know that all this info can be gathered from bugzilla, but I'm lazy and I prefer direct links ;) Of course, feel free to improve it, but I warn you that the page source is a bit messy ;) Have fun, [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/BugzillaLinks -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Why do constructors return GtkWidget?
Hello, I'd like to continue the discussion here of thread [1] from gtk-app-devel-list: The question: why is it normal for GTK widget constructors to return GtkWidget and not their real type? For instance I would expect: gtk_menu_item_new () To return GtkMenuItem*. But it doesn't, it returns GtkWidget*. IMHO is much clear that constructors return their real type, instead GtkWidget. But maybe there is a technical reason for this. Can someone give me some light about this? Thank you for your responses, PD: If there is not technical reasons, maybe we can change this for GTK+ 3 (or 4 ;)), as I think a change like this will break the 2.x ABI. [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-app-devel-list/2009-September/msg00023.html -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Static GTypeInfo and GInterfaceInfo
2009/10/30 Nicola Fontana n...@entidi.it: Hi all, Hello Nicola, on a fresh tree of the latest stable releases: glib-2.22.2 and gtk-2.18.3 (patches attached). I'm succesfully using them since tuesday. I've created a bug for glib [1] and another for gtk+ [2] to make more easy the review process ( Splinter rulez ;)) Regards, [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600161 [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600158 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Status on the TLS support in gio
2009/10/18 Philip Van Hoof s...@pvanhoof.be: Hi there, Hello Philip, With GIO now supporting things like GSocket and GSocketConnection, what are the plans for TLS support? It's in the plans for Glib 2.24 [1] ( TLS (SSL) support for GSocket ). Take a look to bug 588189 [2] Regards, [1] http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/GTKRoadmap [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588189 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
GTK+ Roadmap
Hello, I've created this page [1] as a central place with info (repositories, trackin bugs ...) about Gtk+ 2.20 / Glib 2.24 tasks. Hope it help to find the info faster ;) Please, feel free to change/improve it Regards, [1] http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/GTKRoadmap -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: undo in textview
2009/9/24 Holger Berndt bern...@gmx.de: Anyways, given that undo is a very important user interaction component, and it's nasty to have library dependancies for one or two classes, I think it would be nice to have a standard class and a corresponding viewer in GTK+. It might motivate people to include undo functionality in their own code, increasing usability for GTK+ applications in general, and it could also save as a basis for GTK+-provided undo capabilities in its own widgets where it makes sense (thus, closing the loop to the undo-in-text-views request). Is there a bug filled in bugzilla for this? If not, It'd be great create a new one Regards, -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Compiling gtk libraries and gcc
2009/9/18 Marco Vittorini Orgeas ma...@mavior.eu:
I need to install in parallel to my system gtk old libraries a newer version
of gtk libraries, because I need to compile against it a software:
how can I proceed to let only that software using the newer libraries
without
messing all the system and so maintaining all separate ?
I would be very glad if you can provide some simple/short example making the
assumption that for example I would install the newer versions of GTK under
/opt.
Hello Marco,
I'm not a expert, so maybe there is a better ways to do this.
I have this in my .bashrc: (I install the programs/libraries in ~/local)
export PATH=~/local/bin:~/bin:${PATH}
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=~/local/lib/pkgconfig/:${PKG_CONFIG_PATH}
Then, when I want to compile something, I use
./autogen --prefix=/home/jjardon/local
and then
make; make install
to compile (It will use the libraries manually installed in ~/local)
and install the program in ~/local
Hope helps,
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Future GTK+ projects and 1.18 new features page
Hello, I've recollected some info about future GTK+ features that people is now developing. I'd like to share this info, maybe It's useful for someone: [1] (I can move it to [2] if you want) Also, I think that would be great create a page with the new features of the future 2.18 GTK+ version. I've started this page: [3], but I'd like move it to [4] if you agree and complete it together. Best Regards, [1] http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/GTKFuture [2] http://live.gnome.org/GTK+ [3] http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/TwoPointEighteen [4] http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/TwoPointEighteen -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?
2009/9/2 John Pye j...@curioussymbols.com: Is there a buildbot somewhere running continuous integration testing of GTK+ with the Mac platform? What about other platforms? Is that something that the community is lacking in order to progress this stuff? For other platforms (basically linux), you can take a look here: [1] For my project, I had already concluded that noone else was going to write a Mac port, so I bought a Mac so I could do it myself. I'd be happy to make this Mac available as a buildbot or build server of some sort, at least for a certain fixed number of hours per day, if that was going to be useful to people. That would be really great. I think you should contact with buildbrigade people [2]: - Mailing list: http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/build-brigade-list - IRC: #build-brigade on irc.gnome.org Regards [1] http://build.gnome.org/gtk+ [2] http://live.gnome.org/BuildBrigade -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
GTK+ compilation should work with automake = 1.7
Hello, I tried to compile Gtk+ with new versions of automake (1.10 and 1.11) and it worked without any problem. It would be great hear your experiencies compiling gtk+ with newer automake versions. I've filled a bug here [1] to track the progress. Regards [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588788 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
