Re: [PATCH v2] doc: Document SRFI 64.
Hi Maxime, Maxime Devos writes: > Op 18-11-2023 om 05:42 schreef Maxim Cournoyer: >> * SRFI-61:: A more general `cond' clause >> * SRFI-62:: S-expression comments. >> -* SRFI-64:: A Scheme API for test suites. >> +* SRFI 64:: A Scheme API for test suites. >> * SRFI-67:: Compare procedures >> * SRFI-69:: Basic hash tables. >> * SRFI-71:: Extended let-syntax for multiple values. > > That seems rather inconsistent. It is in Guile (for now), but upstream nobody appears to calls "SRFI 64" as "SRFI-64", so unless we are constrained to use a hyphen, it seems more correct to leave it. If it makes sense, I could send a patch automating the simple substitution to standardize on no hyphen for all of our SRFIs nodes / section names. >> +@c This SRFI 64 documentation was "snarfed" from upstream specification >> +@c HTML document using the 'snarfi' script. > > That HTML document comes with a license that requires: > >> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be >> included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > yet I'm not seeing those notices in the texi. I've added a copyright notice to srfi-modules.texi and the Expat license text to @copying in guile.texi, see v3. Thanks for taking a look! -- Maxim
Re: [PATCH v2] doc: Document SRFI 64.
+@c This SRFI 64 documentation was "snarfed" from upstream specification +@c HTML document using the 'snarfi' script. That HTML document comes with a license that requires: > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be > included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. yet I'm not seeing those notices in the texi. (I assume 'snarfing' is a form of copying here.) OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH v2] doc: Document SRFI 64.
Op 18-11-2023 om 05:42 schreef Maxim Cournoyer: * SRFI-61:: A more general `cond' clause * SRFI-62:: S-expression comments. -* SRFI-64:: A Scheme API for test suites. +* SRFI 64:: A Scheme API for test suites. * SRFI-67:: Compare procedures * SRFI-69:: Basic hash tables. * SRFI-71:: Extended let-syntax for multiple values. That seems rather inconsistent. +@c This SRFI 64 documentation was "snarfed" from upstream specification +@c HTML document using the 'snarfi' script. That HTML document comes with a license that requires: > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be > included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. yet I'm not seeing those notices in the texi. Haven't looked at the actual documentation. Best regards, Maxime Devos. OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH v2] doc: Document SRFI 64.
On 11/18/23 04:42, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
+
+There are other testing frameworks written in Scheme, including
+@url{http://schematics.sourceforge.net/schemeunit.html, SchemeUnit}.
+However SchemeUnit is not portable. It is also a bit on the verbose
+side. It would be useful to have a bridge between this framework and
+SchemeUnit so SchemeUnit tests could run under this framework and vice
+versa. There exists also at least one Scheme wrapper providing a Scheme
http://schematics.sourceforge.net/schemeunit.html is a dead link and
AFAIK PLT SchemeUnit
https://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/schematics/schemeunit.plt/3/0/planet-docs/schemeunit/index.html
is now RackUnit https://docs.racket-lang.org/rackunit/
All the best,
Filip
OpenPGP_0x5B9D16DC27046620.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
