Xavier; Most of the changes are in the Kernel areas. Most of these are accommodations for device handling and some of the minor differences in the standard utilities. Most of these have been automated to configure the Kernel as one of eight different MUMPS and MUMPS-like engines when the Kernel is first being set up.
Best wishes; Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Xavier Guardiola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 1:34 AM Subject: [Hardhats-members] From Cache to GT.M > Dear all, > Could anyone comment which were the main problems when migrating VistA > code to OpenVista, that is, from Cache to GT.M? Although both databases > should support any standard M application, I've read somewhere that some > minor modification had to be done. In wich area? > Thanks! > > Xavier > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! > Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net > Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey > Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix > _______________________________________________ > Hardhats-members mailing list > Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
