Re: What's the motion-state keymap priority (under info mode) ?

[Frank Fischer]

On 10.03.2016 07:19, Shiyao Ma wrote:
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> Now I enconter a new problem,
> 
> for the key `l', it should be Info-history-back
> however, it's now evil-forward-char

Of course. That's because you usually want cursor motions to behave
vim-like, i.e. h, j, k, l move the cursor. This is done by a call to
`evil-add-hjkl-bindings` in evil-integration.el (and, in fact, those
four keys are the only ones). At the same time Ctrl-t and Ctrl-o are
both bound to `Info-history-back`, so you might use them instead.

Best regards,
Frank

___
implementations-list mailing list
implementations-list@lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list

Re: What's the motion-state keymap priority (under info mode) ?

[Shiyao Ma]

Thanks for your help.

Now I enconter a new problem,

for the key `l', it should be Info-history-back
however, it's now evil-forward-char

This seems contradictory to the 'overriding map stuff'.



Regards.
___
implementations-list mailing list
implementations-list@lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list

Re: What's the motion-state keymap priority (under info mode) ?

[Frank Fischer]

> the evil-motion-state-map should have a higer priority than the major
> mode (info mode) keymap.
> 
> However, when in info mode, I found "gg" is falls into the
> info-mode-map, not the evil-motion-state-map.

That's because `Info-mode-map` is by default listed in the user option
`evil-overriding-maps` (`M-x customize-variable RET evil-overriding-maps
RET`). The reason is that otherwise many useful keys would be hidden by
rarely used motions.

Frank

___
implementations-list mailing list
implementations-list@lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list