Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Refactor uabi engine class/instance list creation
Hi Nirmoy,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:02:06AM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> On 4/17/2024 12:49 AM, Andi Shyti wrote:
...
> void intel_engines_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - u16 name_instance, other_instance = 0;
> + u16 class_instance[I915_LAST_UABI_ENGINE_CLASS + 2] = { };
>
> +2 is confusing here. I think we need a better macro.
This is to avoid buffer overflow, otherwise we will always hit
the GEM_BUG_ON below.
> struct legacy_ring ring = {};
> struct list_head *it, *next;
> struct rb_node **p, *prev;
...
> + GEM_BUG_ON(uabi_class >=
> + ARRAY_SIZE(i915->engine_uabi_class_count));
> + i915->engine_uabi_class_count[uabi_class]++;
>
> Shouldn't this be i915->engine_uabi_class_count[uabi_class] = class_instance
> [uabi_class]; ?
that's mostly a counter, we don't really need to be on sync with
the real instance of the engines.
> What I see is that this patch mainly adding this class_instance array and rest
> looks the same.
> May be it make sense to add other upcoming patches to better understand why
> we
> need this patch.
yes, this patch simplifies the coming patches and the logic
inside, as well.
I just wanted to anticipate some of the refactorings so that we
could speed up the reviews. There is no functional change in
here, that's why I thought it was harmless.
Thanks for taking a look into it.
Andi
Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Refactor uabi engine class/instance list creation
Hi Andi,
On 4/17/2024 12:49 AM, Andi Shyti wrote:
For the upcoming changes we need a cleaner way to build the list
of uabi engines.
Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti
---
Hi,
just sending this patch to unburden the coming series from this
single patch inherited from a previously sent series.
Andi
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c | 29 -
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
index 833987015b8b..11cc06c0c785 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void engine_rename(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
const char *name, u16
void intel_engines_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
- u16 name_instance, other_instance = 0;
+ u16 class_instance[I915_LAST_UABI_ENGINE_CLASS + 2] = { };
+2 is confusing here. I think we need a better macro.
struct legacy_ring ring = {};
struct list_head *it, *next;
struct rb_node **p, *prev;
@@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ void intel_engines_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private
*i915)
prev = NULL;
p = >uabi_engines.rb_node;
list_for_each_safe(it, next, ) {
+ u16 uabi_class;
+
struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
container_of(it, typeof(*engine), uabi_list);
@@ -222,15 +224,14 @@ void intel_engines_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
GEM_BUG_ON(engine->class >= ARRAY_SIZE(uabi_classes));
engine->uabi_class = uabi_classes[engine->class];
- if (engine->uabi_class == I915_NO_UABI_CLASS) {
- name_instance = other_instance++;
- } else {
- GEM_BUG_ON(engine->uabi_class >=
- ARRAY_SIZE(i915->engine_uabi_class_count));
- name_instance =
-
i915->engine_uabi_class_count[engine->uabi_class]++;
- }
- engine->uabi_instance = name_instance;
+
+ if (engine->uabi_class == I915_NO_UABI_CLASS)
+ uabi_class = I915_LAST_UABI_ENGINE_CLASS + 1;
+ else
+ uabi_class = engine->uabi_class;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(uabi_class >= ARRAY_SIZE(class_instance));
+ engine->uabi_instance = class_instance[uabi_class]++;
/*
* Replace the internal name with the final user and log facing
@@ -238,11 +239,15 @@ void intel_engines_driver_register(struct
drm_i915_private *i915)
*/
engine_rename(engine,
intel_engine_class_repr(engine->class),
- name_instance);
+ engine->uabi_instance);
- if (engine->uabi_class == I915_NO_UABI_CLASS)
+ if (uabi_class > I915_LAST_UABI_ENGINE_CLASS)
continue;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(uabi_class >=
+ ARRAY_SIZE(i915->engine_uabi_class_count));
+ i915->engine_uabi_class_count[uabi_class]++;
Shouldn't this be i915->engine_uabi_class_count[uabi_class] =
class_instance[uabi_class]; ?
What I see is that this patch mainly adding this class_instance array
and rest looks the same.
May be it make sense to add other upcoming patches to better understand
why we need this patch.
Regards,
Nirmoy
+
rb_link_node(>uabi_node, prev, p);
rb_insert_color(>uabi_node, >uabi_engines);
[PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Refactor uabi engine class/instance list creation
For the upcoming changes we need a cleaner way to build the list
of uabi engines.
Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti
---
Hi,
just sending this patch to unburden the coming series from this
single patch inherited from a previously sent series.
Andi
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c | 29 -
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
index 833987015b8b..11cc06c0c785 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void engine_rename(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
const char *name, u16
void intel_engines_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
- u16 name_instance, other_instance = 0;
+ u16 class_instance[I915_LAST_UABI_ENGINE_CLASS + 2] = { };
struct legacy_ring ring = {};
struct list_head *it, *next;
struct rb_node **p, *prev;
@@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ void intel_engines_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private
*i915)
prev = NULL;
p = >uabi_engines.rb_node;
list_for_each_safe(it, next, ) {
+ u16 uabi_class;
+
struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
container_of(it, typeof(*engine), uabi_list);
@@ -222,15 +224,14 @@ void intel_engines_driver_register(struct
drm_i915_private *i915)
GEM_BUG_ON(engine->class >= ARRAY_SIZE(uabi_classes));
engine->uabi_class = uabi_classes[engine->class];
- if (engine->uabi_class == I915_NO_UABI_CLASS) {
- name_instance = other_instance++;
- } else {
- GEM_BUG_ON(engine->uabi_class >=
- ARRAY_SIZE(i915->engine_uabi_class_count));
- name_instance =
-
i915->engine_uabi_class_count[engine->uabi_class]++;
- }
- engine->uabi_instance = name_instance;
+
+ if (engine->uabi_class == I915_NO_UABI_CLASS)
+ uabi_class = I915_LAST_UABI_ENGINE_CLASS + 1;
+ else
+ uabi_class = engine->uabi_class;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(uabi_class >= ARRAY_SIZE(class_instance));
+ engine->uabi_instance = class_instance[uabi_class]++;
/*
* Replace the internal name with the final user and log facing
@@ -238,11 +239,15 @@ void intel_engines_driver_register(struct
drm_i915_private *i915)
*/
engine_rename(engine,
intel_engine_class_repr(engine->class),
- name_instance);
+ engine->uabi_instance);
- if (engine->uabi_class == I915_NO_UABI_CLASS)
+ if (uabi_class > I915_LAST_UABI_ENGINE_CLASS)
continue;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(uabi_class >=
+ ARRAY_SIZE(i915->engine_uabi_class_count));
+ i915->engine_uabi_class_count[uabi_class]++;
+
rb_link_node(>uabi_node, prev, p);
rb_insert_color(>uabi_node, >uabi_engines);
--
2.43.0
