[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Henri Biestro resolved JEXL-240.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2
Expose the Jexl engine evaluating a script/expression as a thread local;
Make classes functors, ie class(arg) will attempt to call a ctor, a simpler
version of new(class, arg);
Fix antish variable resolution when used as method/function call;
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/JexlEngine.java
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/internal/Engine.java
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/internal/Interpreter.java
src/test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/AntishCallTest.java
Committed revision 1811336.
> Unable to invoke a call operator using antish style variable resoltion
> --
>
> Key: JEXL-240
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-240
> Project: Commons JEXL
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.1
>Reporter: Dmitri Blinov
>Assignee: Henri Biestro
> Fix For: 3.2
>
> Attachments: AntishCallTest.java
>
>
> Suppose I have declared an antish style context variable under the name
> {{java.math.BigDecimal}} of the {{Class}} type.
> To test that it works correctly I use the following script
> {code}var x = java.math.BigDecimal; x("1234"){code} which returns correct
> value.
> Now I want to invoke an overloaded call operator directly for this variable
> using {code}java.math.BigDecimal("1234"){code}
> which returns an error
> {panel}
> undefined variable java.math
> {panel}
> The expected behaviour is to return the same value as in the first script.
> I have created a test case for this, please have a look.
> Thanks!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
