[Issue 6401] Allowing more than one Alphabetical Index

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=6401

MaxUXtotheMax  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||h...@derjo.de

--- Comment #44 from MaxUXtotheMax  ---
Ok, so it's the year 2018, we have bitcoins, virtual reality and a toddler
became a president.

How difficult can it be to implement this awesome feature? I've been holding
back for 16 (SIXTEEN) years with my MS Word purchase hoping the alphabetical
multi-index would get implemented in OO.

I can't wait much longer for this feature as I really need to finish my
dissertation on "The neural effects and defects in the state of disquiet
through delayed UX enhancements in open-source applications." which I actually
meant to finish in 2002.   

So please, do it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
You are on the CC list for the issue.

[Issue 6401] Allowing more than one Alphabetical Index

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=6401

antale  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||elvira.an...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
You are the assignee for the issue.

[Issue 6401] Allowing more than one Alphabetical Index

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=6401

Ari Diacou  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ari.dia...@gmail.com

--- Comment #42 from Ari Diacou  ---
I would like to second what all the scientists have said, except I'm a
law-student. When filing briefs with the court, you must make a "Table of
Authorities" which is an index of all cases, and statutes that your brief
relies on. These both appear under the section "Table of Authorities" but
mechanically, they are two indexes that each must be sorted alphabetically, and
the entries must be bunched together, so that if I cite 35 USC 271(a) on page
2, 35 USC 282 on page 10, and 35 USC 271(b) on page 20. 

It should appear as:
35 USC 271.2,20
35 USC 282...10

I would like to use OOo when I get out of school, but without at least a
work-around, I cant.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.