Re: JDO API compability with JDK 1.3 (issue)
Hi Erik,Thanks. The protocol is that the person who filed the JIRA issue (this is you) should mark it RESOLVED once they have verified that the patch has been checked in and it solves the issue.Thanks,CraigOn Jul 26, 2005, at 12:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi Craig,Your last patch solved the issue. Let me know if I have to change the issuestatusRegards,Erik Bengtson Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: JDO API compability with JDK 1.3
From: Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a question what kind of JDK 1.3 compatibility do we want to support? I see that JDO plans to support JDK 1.3 from the wiki, but I was wondering why? Given the end of service dates for the various 1.3 VMs I was thinking that Derby 10.1 could be the last release to support 1.3. However if there's a good reason, and JDO would be one, Derby would not remove 1.3 support, but I am curious what lead JDO to this decision. Dan.
Re: JDO API compability with JDK 1.3
Hi Dan,On Jul 21, 2005, at 2:18 AM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:From: Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a question what kind of JDK 1.3 compatibility do we want tosupport? I see that JDO plans to support JDK 1.3 from the wiki, but I waswondering why? Given the end of service dates for the various 1.3 VMs Iwas thinking that Derby 10.1 could be the last release to support 1.3.For the same reason, JDO 2 will probably be the last JDO version to support 1.3. We expect to wrap up JDO 2 in the next couple of months and then it won't be an issue going forward.However if there's a good reason, and JDO would be one, Derby would notremove 1.3 support, but I am curious what lead JDO to this decision.If you remove 1.3 support for releases beyond 10.1, then all that means is that to run with 1.3, you would need 10.1 of Derby and 2.0 of JDO. No problem.CraigDan. Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: JDO API compability with JDK 1.3
Hi Craig, this looks good. I have a question what kind of JDK 1.3 compatibility do we want to support? Your change allows to run an application against a api20.jar using JDK 1.3. But we still require JDK 1.4 to build the api20.jar, meaning to compile the javax.jdo sources. I think this is not an issue, but we need to describe this in the README.txt. Regards Michael Hi Erik, Can you please try this patch? Thanks, Craig On Jul 19, 2005, at 2:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The JDO API Head version is not JDK 1.3 compatible. Checkout the below exception. I'm not sure if I should file JIRA issues. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java.util.Currency at javax.jdo.spi.JDOImplHelper.class$(JDOImplHelper.java:552) at javax.jdo.spi.JDOImplHelper.clinit(JDOImplHelper.java:552) at javax.jdo.identity.ObjectIdentity$1.run(ObjectIdentity.java:49) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.jdo.identity.ObjectIdentity.clinit(ObjectIdentity.java:45) at java.lang.Class.forName1(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:142) at org.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.class$(MetaDataManager.java:1026) at org.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.isClassWithoutMetaData(MetaDataManager.java:1021) at org.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.getMetaDataForClassOrInterface(MetaDataManager.java:361) at org.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.getMetaDataForClass(MetaDataManager.java:324) at org.jpox.metadata.ClassMetaData.populate(ClassMetaData.java:420) at org.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.populateClassesInFile(MetaDataManager.java:635) at org.jpox.enhancer.conf.JDOConfigManager.parseAndRegisterFile(JDOConfigManager.java:60) at org.jpox.enhancer.GeneratorBase.readJDOConfig(GeneratorBase.java:1307) at org.jpox.enhancer.JPOXEnhancer.main(JPOXEnhancer.java:249) Exception in thread main Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
Re: JDO API compability with JDK 1.3
You are right. We have to mention java.util.Currency in order to support it, and those classes we need to compile under 1.4. I'd like to get feedback from others on this as well. Craig, That's what we're doing with JPOX. I can't see a better way -- Andy
Re: JDO API compability with JDK 1.3
Hi Erik,Yes, please file a JIRA issue. Thanks,CraigOn Jul 19, 2005, at 2:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The JDO API Head version is not JDK 1.3 compatible.Checkout the below exception. I'm not sure if I should file JIRA issues.java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java.util.Currencyat javax.jdo.spi.JDOImplHelper.class$(JDOImplHelper.java:552)at javax.jdo.spi.JDOImplHelper.clinit(JDOImplHelper.java:552)at javax.jdo.identity.ObjectIdentity$1.run(ObjectIdentity.java:49)at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)at javax.jdo.identity.ObjectIdentity.clinit(ObjectIdentity.java:45)at java.lang.Class.forName1(Native Method)at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:142)at org.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.class$(MetaDataManager.java:1026)atorg.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.isClassWithoutMetaData(MetaDataManager.java:1021)atorg.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.getMetaDataForClassOrInterface(MetaDataManager.java:361)atorg.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.getMetaDataForClass(MetaDataManager.java:324)at org.jpox.metadata.ClassMetaData.populate(ClassMetaData.java:420)atorg.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.populateClassesInFile(MetaDataManager.java:635)atorg.jpox.enhancer.conf.JDOConfigManager.parseAndRegisterFile(JDOConfigManager.java:60)at org.jpox.enhancer.GeneratorBase.readJDOConfig(GeneratorBase.java:1307)at org.jpox.enhancer.JPOXEnhancer.main(JPOXEnhancer.java:249)Exception in thread "main" Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: JDO API compability with JDK 1.3
Hi Erik,Can you please try this patch?Thanks,Craig jdoimplhelper.patch Description: Binary data On Jul 19, 2005, at 2:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The JDO API Head version is not JDK 1.3 compatible.Checkout the below exception. I'm not sure if I should file JIRA issues.java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java.util.Currencyat javax.jdo.spi.JDOImplHelper.class$(JDOImplHelper.java:552)at javax.jdo.spi.JDOImplHelper.clinit(JDOImplHelper.java:552)at javax.jdo.identity.ObjectIdentity$1.run(ObjectIdentity.java:49)at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)at javax.jdo.identity.ObjectIdentity.clinit(ObjectIdentity.java:45)at java.lang.Class.forName1(Native Method)at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:142)at org.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.class$(MetaDataManager.java:1026)atorg.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.isClassWithoutMetaData(MetaDataManager.java:1021)atorg.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.getMetaDataForClassOrInterface(MetaDataManager.java:361)atorg.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.getMetaDataForClass(MetaDataManager.java:324)at org.jpox.metadata.ClassMetaData.populate(ClassMetaData.java:420)atorg.jpox.metadata.MetaDataManager.populateClassesInFile(MetaDataManager.java:635)atorg.jpox.enhancer.conf.JDOConfigManager.parseAndRegisterFile(JDOConfigManager.java:60)at org.jpox.enhancer.GeneratorBase.readJDOConfig(GeneratorBase.java:1307)at org.jpox.enhancer.JPOXEnhancer.main(JPOXEnhancer.java:249)Exception in thread "main" Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
