Re: [jibx-users] [Bug?] JIBX Incorrect Value Conversion for ByteArray

2010-10-11 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
Hi Jack,

Looks like a BindGen bug. You might want to create a Jira to make sure
this is corrected for 1.2.3.

  - Dennis

Dennis M. Sosnoski
XML and Web Services in Java
Training and Consulting
http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117


On 10/04/2010 09:28 AM, Jack Vinijtrongjit wrote:

 Hi,

 According to this page, ByteArray is supposed to be converted to
 base64 representation of binary data.

 http://jibx.sourceforge.net/details/conversions.html

 However, what I'm getting when running bindGen is

 xs:element type=xs:byte name=byte minOccurs=0
 maxOccurs=unbounded/

 Am I missing something here? Could this possibly be a bug? I'm using
 version 1.2.2.

 Thanks,
 Jack


 --
 Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
 environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security 
 easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the 
 two and get a better understanding.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d


 ___
 jibx-users mailing list
 jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
   
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2  L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb___
jibx-users mailing list
jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users


[jibx-users] [Bug?] JIBX Incorrect Value Conversion for ByteArray

2010-10-03 Thread Jack Vinijtrongjit
Hi,

According to this page, ByteArray is supposed to be converted to base64 
representation of binary data.

http://jibx.sourceforge.net/details/conversions.html

However, what I'm getting when running bindGen is

xs:element type=xs:byte name=byte minOccurs=0 maxOccurs=unbounded/

Am I missing something here? Could this possibly be a bug? I'm using version 
1.2.2.

Thanks,
Jack
--
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security 
easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the 
two and get a better understanding.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d___
jibx-users mailing list
jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users