hi guys,
(Sorry I haven't been active, work and all)
On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 09:29 AM, Jim Pick wrote:
Well, the original plan for 1.1.0 was to freeze on May 18th, and release
on June 1st. Obviously, we didn't freeze on May 18th, and did not
release on June 1st. I'll take the blame for that - I wasn't
prepared...
Nobody's fault, the dates were picked to allow for some buffering anyways. I'd just like to see it go before the 15th since I'll be on vacation then.
My intention is to label the 1.1.x series of releases as "development
releases". We'll do a big 1.2.0 release sometime in the future, which
we will label a "production release". So we'll be following the
convention as the Linux kernel, where odd-numbered minor number releases
are development, and even-numbered minor number releases are production.
Here's a proposal for 1.1.1 - I think we should do a two month cycle.
Indeed, I've had it backwards all along. I wanted to stretch it out because I figured we wouldn't get a whole lot of development done in that amount of time. But, as seen by the last couple weeks, people come alive in response to a deadline ;) So, increasing the frequency is probably good for pushing things forward. (I'll stick with my conservative streak though and vote for three months ;).
As for regression test results - what I'd like to do is to get some more
automated reporting via the website. And maybe we could snapshot that
for the development releases. This seems like a longer term project
though, for future releases.
That would be cool
Cheers,
- Jim
tim
_______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
