Hi, On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> In a couple of cases I have had the need to include a Kconfig file only > if present. > The current 'source' directive works as one would expect. It bails out > if the file is missing. I don't really like it, it's an open invitation to abuse. I'd rather like to see the user first, which might need it. bye, Roman ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
