[kscreenlocker] [Bug 360396] kscreenlocker-greet ignores KB and Mouse after screen energy saving activates
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360396 Nilschanged: What|Removed |Added CC||nils.acrim...@gmail.com --- Comment #26 from Nils --- I also have this issue with plasma-desktop 5.7.3-1 on archlinux and extra/xf86-video-intel 1:2.99.917+688+g49daf5d-1 driver, same than Nick Shaforostoff. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[plasma4] [Bug 309214] Bouncing icon on mouse cursor occasionally remains stuck on after the application has launched
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309214 Nilschanged: What|Removed |Added CC||nils.acrim...@gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Nils --- I can confirm this issue. Easy for me to reproduce, I just have to click on an email link (in order to send an email) in Firefox while no email client has been configured. It then try to launch an application but it just does not know which application it has to launch, so it stay with the busy icon forever. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[krunner] [Bug 360505] When starting docker krunner crash
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360505 --- Comment #1 from Nils--- Created attachment 97884 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97884=edit journalctl of krunner crash -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[krunner] [Bug 360505] New: When starting docker krunner crash
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360505 Bug ID: 360505 Summary: When starting docker krunner crash Product: krunner Version: 5.5.5 Platform: Archlinux Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: crash Priority: NOR Component: windows Assignee: m...@vhanda.in Reporter: nils.acrim...@gmail.com Created attachment 97883 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97883=edit krunner crash following starting docker Almost every times I launch docker through "sudo systemctl start docker", krunner is crashing. I have not a lot of data available. I am sending them through attached files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[plasmashell] [Bug 351852] Media player plasmoid does not pilot Spotify client
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351852 --- Comment #10 from Nils--- You can talk about it here: https://community.spotify.com/t5/Help-Desktop-Linux-Windows-Web/Linux-Spotify-client-1-x-now-in-stable/td-p/1300404/page/4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 358125] the lock-up can be pass through without typing password
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358125 --- Comment #17 from Nils--- Wow, thank you very much! I was afraid to see this bug never solved as it seem that no one was facing it/able to reproduce it. It is the second bug I have reported fixed this week, great job to you. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[systemsettings] [Bug 358171] Breeze theme breaks sddm - login screen presented three times
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358171 --- Comment #45 from Nils--- I am using Nvidia driver, and it says here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=198656 that "Nvidia uses their own implementation of OpenGL, thus DRI3 from Mesa libs has no influence." so I am a bit puzzled. Furthermore, I have no other theme suggested in SDDM graphical user interface than Breeze. Otherwise, has someone reported the issue in xorg? It would be nice to reference the xorg issue on this ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 358125] the lock-up can be pass through without typing password
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358125 --- Comment #9 from Nils--- Well, I tried again with the last updates: [2016-01-22 15:36] [ALPM] upgraded linux (4.3.3-2 -> 4.3.3-3) [2016-01-22 15:36] [ALPM] upgraded plasma-framework (5.18.0-1 -> 5.18.0-3) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded kde-cli-tools (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded kde-gtk-config (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded kdecoration (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded breeze (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded libksysguard (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded libkscreen (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded plasma-workspace (5.5.3-2 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded kdeplasma-addons (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded kinfocenter (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded kmenuedit (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded kscreen (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded ksshaskpass (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded ksysguard (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded kwrited (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded plasma-desktop (5.5.3-2 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded plasma-nm (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded plasma-pa (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) [2016-01-27 13:51] [ALPM] upgraded plasma-workspace-wallpapers (5.5.3-1 -> 5.5.4-1) And I am still facing the issue, below the automated crash error reporter logs: Application: Plasma (plasmashell), signal: Segmentation fault Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib/libthread_db.so.1". [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fb8fffe2800 (LWP 1862))] Thread 14 (Thread 0x7fb8e882c700 (LWP 1879)): #0 0x7fb8fa61416d in read () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x7fb8f75d5270 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x7fb8f7591aa4 in g_main_context_check () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #3 0x7fb8f7591f60 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #4 0x7fb8f75920cc in g_main_context_iteration () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #5 0x7fb8faf3b56b in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents(QFlags) () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #6 0x7fb8faee257a in QEventLoop::exec(QFlags) () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #7 0x7fb8facfebe4 in QThread::exec() () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #8 0x7fb8fd617055 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQt5Qml.so.5 #9 0x7fb8fad03b8e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #10 0x7fb8f9e204a4 in start_thread () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 #11 0x7fb8fa62113d in clone () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 Thread 13 (Thread 0x7fb8e0f7b700 (LWP 1884)): #0 0x7fb8f75d6614 in g_mutex_unlock () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #1 0x7fb8f7591e6d in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x7fb8f75920cc in g_main_context_iteration () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #3 0x7fb8faf3b56b in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents(QFlags) () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #4 0x7fb8faee257a in QEventLoop::exec(QFlags) () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #5 0x7fb8facfebe4 in QThread::exec() () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #6 0x7fb8fd617055 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQt5Qml.so.5 #7 0x7fb8fad03b8e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #8 0x7fb8f9e204a4 in start_thread () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 #9 0x7fb8fa62113d in clone () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 Thread 12 (Thread 0x7fb8da495700 (LWP 1893)): #0 0x7fb8f75d65f9 in g_mutex_lock () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #1 0x7fb8f7591b46 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x7fb8f7592020 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #3 0x7fb8f75920cc in g_main_context_iteration () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #4 0x7fb8faf3b56b in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents(QFlags) () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #5 0x7fb8faee257a in QEventLoop::exec(QFlags) () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #6 0x7fb8facfebe4 in QThread::exec() () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #7 0x7fb8fd617055 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQt5Qml.so.5 #8 0x7fb8fad03b8e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5 #9 0x7fb8f9e204a4 in start_thread () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 #10 0x7fb8fa62113d in clone () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 Thread 11 (Thread 0x7fb8d8b7f700 (LWP 1902)): #0 0x7fb8f9e2607f in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x7fb8ffa3f934 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQt5Script.so.5 #2 0x7fb8ffa3f979 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQt5Script.so.5 #3 0x7fb8f9e204a4 in start_thread () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 #4 0x7fb8fa62113d in clone () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 Thread 10 (Thread 0x7fb8d2161700 (LWP 1905)): #0 0x7fb8f75d65f9 in g_mutex_lock () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #1 0x7fb8f7591b46 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x7fb8f7592020 in ?? () from
[user-manager] [Bug 346215] Cannot remove user account picture
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346215 --- Comment #7 from Nils--- Hu... Sorry, I didn't see your answer at that time. So, I have installed accountsservice: ➜ ~ sudo pacman -S accountsservice warning: accountsservice-0.6.40-1 is up to date -- reinstalling Packages (1) accountsservice-0.6.40-1 Total Installed Size: 0.84 MiB Net Upgrade Size: 0.00 MiB (1/1) reinstalling accountsservice [##] 100% But still no user account & password app in the settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[systemsettings] [Bug 358171] Breeze theme breaks sddm - login screen presented three times
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358171 --- Comment #42 from Nils--- I am also facing the issue with my system which is an updated archlinux distribution. I would like an explanation about the bug status which is: RESOLVED UPSTREAM I am not sure to understand this status, does it mean that a fix has been found? Or that the fix will not be found because the bug does not come from the KDE environment but from Qt because from what I understand, it seems to be a Qt issue. But then, do we have any idea when will it be resolved? Is the only available solution is to downgrade qt5-base from 5.5.1.9 to 5.5.1.8? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 358125] the lock-up can be pass through without typing password
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358125 --- Comment #10 from Nils--- PS: While unlocking through this way, the panel disappears from my desktop environment, while it was configured for the user (which, like I said, has a password configured & required in order to login). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[systemsettings] [Bug 358171] Breeze theme breaks sddm - login screen presented three times
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358171 Nilschanged: What|Removed |Added CC||nils.acrim...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 358125] the lock-up can be pass through without typing password
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358125 --- Comment #5 from Nils--- Created attachment 96755 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96755=edit Hacking KDE session locker by closing the lid several times So here the full log about my successful KDE hacking by closing the lid. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 358125] the lock-up can be pass through without typing password
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358125 --- Comment #6 from Nils--- @David Edmundson, So I have tested it again on my updated computer and it has not been long before I have been successfully logged in as root on my computer without typing any password by just closing the lid several times. The people outside looked me like I was crazy. :D Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 358125] the lock-up can be pass through without typing password
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358125 --- Comment #8 from Nils--- Yes for all the users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 358125] the lock-up can be pass through without typing password
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358125 --- Comment #2 from Nils--- The time indicated is 5 secondes. I have been thinking that first, but when I try to wiggle the mouse, it does not unlock. Furthermore, the time during which I do nothing is greater than 5 minutes & 5 secondes (I have not updated these settings). It is only by closing the lid that I can unlock my session. Another thing really strange (but not sure whether related). When opening for the first time my session (following a reboot), I need to type several time my password (rightly). Each time it makes all the SDDM disappears and reboot it. Until... somehow... it finish by opening my session. When I type the bad password it is flag as bad... but when right typed, it just seems to crash. You will find some errors logs on the attached file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 358125] the lock-up can be pass through without typing password
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358125 --- Comment #3 from Nils--- Created attachment 96706 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96706=edit errors when logging for the first time -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[plasmashell] [Bug 358125] New: the lock-up can be pass through without typing password
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358125 Bug ID: 358125 Summary: the lock-up can be pass through without typing password Product: plasmashell Version: 5.5.3 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: k...@davidedmundson.co.uk Reporter: nils.acrim...@gmail.com CC: bhus...@gmail.com, plasma-b...@kde.org When I let my computer idle for some time, it automatically lock-up, and it used to be then impossible to use my computer without knowing my password. However, I have found a trick which allow me to open the session without typing any password. With my laptop, I first connect my HDMI output to a second screen, then I am waiting for the idle lock-up to occurs. When it is really locked (not immediately after the lock-up appears but something like one minute after) I just have to close the lid and my session is instantaneously reopen without typing anything. Also, the panel disappear in the operation. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Use a laptop 2. Use a second screen through HDMI 3. Wait for an automatically closed session 4. Then close the lid Actual Results: The session is unlocked Expected Results: The session should still be locked I am not sure which severity I should choose, and I don't know whether it is reproducible on another computer. However it seems really serious and not much reassuring. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.