[digikam] [Bug 349564] Add support of face tags group

2021-04-23 Thread Ricardo Sanz
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349564

Ricardo Sanz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||arreb...@gmail.com

--- Comment #7 from Ricardo Sanz  ---
I would say that is possible to have the same face multiple times in a single
image. For example, someone with a mirror. Or people holding a picture of
themselves. Or a collage image where different pictures of the same person.

Also, what would happen with the pictures that already have the same face
multiple times? Would Digikam remove all but one? Leave as they are?

I think this should be an option, not a mandatory requirment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[dolphin] [Bug 410800] Device in Bookmark will show docker mount point when docker container opened

2020-04-19 Thread Ricardo Sanz
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410800

--- Comment #2 from Ricardo Sanz  ---
Same problem here. Additionally, Dolphin sometimes hangs or reacts very very
slow, not sure if it's related.

Would be possible to have a regexp or something similar that hides devices? So,
for example, any /var/lib/docker/overlay/* would be hidden.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 375703] Moving grouped images into another album removes groups

2017-03-18 Thread Ricardo Sanz
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703

--- Comment #21 from Ricardo Sanz <arreb...@gmail.com> ---
IMHO I don't think grouping images is so similar to subalbums. One typical use
of groups is group the RAW and the JPG file of the same image. This way you
only see one picture (the JPG probably) of your images instead of having the
RAW image, the camera JPG and your own developed JPG. 

Also, about mentioned advantages, it's said: "Image groups are represented in
the file system and not just in the database (better for external image
manipulation)". This may be true, but is it really an advantage? Using groups
for each picture and its derivatives (RAW, JPGs, etc) means each 'real' album,
in the filesystem, would be a bunch of directories, with all versions of the
same picture on each. Is this better than having all in the same directory?
IMHO is not.

Using directories for each group probably will end in a cluttered album view
with thousand of tiny albums. Also, it makes necessary to select the main
picture of each subalbum to be shown in the parent album: this needs a
convenient GUI to do it. And, are all subalbums going to be shown in the parent
album alongside the parent's picture? This will be a change in current
Digikam's behavior, potentially affecting many users.

Also, grouping is a feature present in other image software like Darktable or
Adobe Lightroom.


I just wanted to add my point of view, of course I don't know the problems that
grouping brings to the Digikam base code, I'm a talking only as a user :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 375703] Moving grouped images into another album removes groups

2017-03-18 Thread Ricardo Sanz
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703

Ricardo Sanz <arreb...@gmail.com> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||arreb...@gmail.com

--- Comment #20 from Ricardo Sanz <arreb...@gmail.com> ---
*** Bug 377782 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 377782] Group is lost when moved to another album

2017-03-18 Thread Ricardo Sanz
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377782

Ricardo Sanz <arreb...@gmail.com> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Ricardo Sanz <arreb...@gmail.com> ---
Sorry, I've found this is duplicated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 375703 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 377782] New: Group is lost when moved to another album

2017-03-18 Thread Ricardo Sanz
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377782

Bug ID: 377782
   Summary: Group is lost when moved to another album
   Product: digikam
   Version: 5.5.0
  Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: NOR
 Component: AlbumsView-Group
  Assignee: digikam-de...@kde.org
  Reporter: arreb...@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---

If a group of photos are moved (for example using drag and drop from the main
album to the album tree on the left) the group is ungrouped.

I think group settings should be maintained.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.