[valgrind] [Bug 389065] valgrind meets gcc flag -Wlogical-op
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389065 Ivo Raisrchanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Ivo Raisr --- Fixed in commit f19a956e0a96b4f6b37c50b00ae24ecf09a7a3f5. https://sourceware.org/git/?p=valgrind.git;a=commitdiff;h=f19a956e0a96b4f6b37c50b00ae24ecf09a7a3f5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 389065] valgrind meets gcc flag -Wlogical-op
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389065 Ivo Raisrchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Ivo Raisr --- The attached patch enables -Wlogical-op (if supported) and fixes an obvious typo. I used https://github.com/mirage/xen/blob/master/tools/libxc/xc_monitor.c for an inspiration. My gcc 7.2.0 on Ubuntu 17.10 did not report a problem in priv/guest_arm_toIR.c with -Wlogical-op. I guess the first reported problem must have been caused by some other factor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 389065] valgrind meets gcc flag -Wlogical-op
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389065 Ivo Raisrchanged: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jsew...@acm.org |iv...@ivosh.net --- Comment #3 from Ivo Raisr --- Created attachment 109970 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=109970=edit patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 389065] valgrind meets gcc flag -Wlogical-op
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389065 --- Comment #2 from dcb...@hotmail.com --- >Would you like to supply a patch for both the occurrences? >Would you like to supply a patch for extending Valgrind build No thanks. I just find them. Folks who know the code are in a better state to fix them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[valgrind] [Bug 389065] valgrind meets gcc flag -Wlogical-op
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389065 Ivo Raisrchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||iv...@ivosh.net Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Ivo Raisr --- Thank you for the bug report. Indeed, the second one is a bug in Valgrind code. The first one is not a bug but merely a mental note for maintainer that this piece of code handles both pkhbt (tb == 0) and pkhbt (tb == 1) variants. Would you like to supply a patch for both the occurrences? Would you like to supply a patch for extending Valgrind build with -Wlogical-op (have a look at configure.ac, similar flags are enabled there). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.