[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2008-11-07 Thread Dmitry Kadashev
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989


Dmitry Kadashev dkadashev gmail com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2008-02-18 Thread owner
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 
pino kde org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||algreig bigpond net au



--- Additional Comments From pino kde org  2008-02-19 01:51 ---
*** Bug 158028 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2008-01-27 Thread Tom Albers
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 
tomalbers kde nl changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tomalbers kde nl



--- Additional Comments From tomalbers kde nl  2008-01-27 12:29 ---
(as maintainer of that part of kdepimlibs)
After you fix the issues outlined by tmg, you can commit the kdepimlibs part.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2008-01-26 Thread Thomas McGuire
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From Thomas.McGuire gmx net  2008-01-26 22:45 
---
Oh, and another thing: The HTML produced by QTextEdit is crap, it has lots of 
unneccesary tags. For Hello World I get:
htmlheadmeta name=qrichtext content=1 /style type=text/css p, li 
 { white-space: pre-wrap; }
 /style/headbody style= font-family:'Monospace'; font-size:10pt;
 font-weight:400; font-style:normal;
 p style= margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; 
 margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;span style= 
 font-weight:600;Hello World/span/p/body/html

But that is a Qt bug. However, it makes manually adding some tags to the 
signature a pain.
Maybe most of the above standard tags can be removed when switching from 
plaintext to HTML?
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2008-01-26 Thread Thomas McGuire
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From Thomas.McGuire gmx net  2008-01-26 22:53 
---
Oh, another thing that needs to be fixed is that changing the identity in the 
composer does not change the signature.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2008-01-23 Thread Edwin Schepers
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 
yez familieschepers nl changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Attachment #9268 is|0   |1
   obsolete||



--- Additional Comments From yez familieschepers nl  2008-01-23 20:54 
---
Created an attachment (id=23227)
 -- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=23227action=view)
HTML signature

Hi,
This (and the next) is a patch against trunk that enables HTML signatures.
Can I commit?
It still needs some finetuning (like naming), but the functionality is
basically there.

Regards,
Edwin
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2008-01-23 Thread Edwin Schepers
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From yez familieschepers nl  2008-01-23 20:56 
---
Created an attachment (id=23228)
 -- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=23228action=view)
HTML signature (kdepimlibs)

This is a kdepimlibs patch against trunk that enables HTML signatures together
with the previous patch.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2008-01-23 Thread Allen Winter
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From winter kde org  2008-01-23 21:46 ---
You have my blessing to please commit the patch for kdepimlibs.

Thomas has promised to look at the patch for the KMail part soon.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2007-12-03 Thread Mathieu Jobin
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From somekool somekool net  2007-12-03 16:02 ---
I dont see how is this related...
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2007-11-28 Thread Peter Tselios
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From s91066 yahoo gr  2007-11-28 09:49 ---
Patches for the trunk (KDE4) versions are always welcome. The 3.5 branch is in 
a feature freeze however. 

Well, in case not enough developers create code for KMail, then, why is it a 
part of KDE? I mean, there are alternatives! Of course that's not an option. 
What IS an option, is to ask large companies for support!
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2007-11-27 Thread 123321
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From gfdsa gfdsa org  2007-11-27 15:59 ---
Additional Comment #29 From Thomas McGuire 2007-11-26 17:39
Thomas, it is not the matter of lack of time. If one does not have time to 
finish something then just don't start! That is the problem! I was s happy 
when I've seen Patch to enable HTMl signatures, but can you compare what I 
have expected with what I've got? Obviously it is less related to kdepim and 
more to the way things work in community driven projects.

Sorry for my previous post, it was certainly overreacted. Again, I thought my 
favorite software just got better and instead I was disappointed enough to try 
the Evolution-Thunderbird-GMail cycle again for a day.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2007-11-26 Thread Thomas McGuire
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From Thomas.McGuire gmx net  2007-11-26 21:19 
---
 I use KMail from day 1, but, the arrogance of the kdepim regarding HTML 
 support is something that kills me.
Huh? I just said in the previous comment that this has nothing to do with 
unwillingness or even arrogance, but rather the lack of time by the developers 
and the actual lack of developers.
Patches for the trunk (KDE4) versions are always welcome. The 3.5 branch is in 
a feature freeze however.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2007-11-26 Thread Fred van Zwieten
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From kde-bugs dezwietjes nl  2007-11-26 22:50 
---
Gentlemen, gentlemen...calm...down!

The right way of getting this done is one of three things:
1. If you're a developer, start developing
2. If you're not a developer, vote this thing up. Find other users to vote for 
this. Make it THE most popular request for the pim package.
3. Keep bugging the developers on the dev-list (although they might not like 
this option)
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Bug 81989] kmail need to support HTML signature

2007-11-06 Thread jerald jackson
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81989 




--- Additional Comments From jerald.jackson gmail com  2007-11-06 19:18 
---
Well, this is my answer.  The other comments are right on, this is 2007 and any 
email client needs to support html signatures.  They are required by many 
employers and the continued lack of support after this bug was opened in May of 
2004 shows me that kmail is not being developed as a serious email client.

For the record, I was a Unix admin for 12 years and prefer text based email 
over anything else.  However, we all have to grow up someday.

I suggest to everyone else that you cease using kmail if you want HTML 
signature support and look to other clients.  This lack of support is more than 
a little juvenile.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs