Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix an issue with relocatable vmlinux

2023-11-27 Thread Simon Horman
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 04:54:10PM +0800, WANG Rui wrote:
> Normally vmlinux for LoongArch is of ET_EXEC type, while if built with
> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE (this is PIE) and Clang, it will be of ET_DYN type.
> Meanwhile, physical address field of segments in vmlinux has actually
> the same value as virtual address field.
> 
> Similar to arm64, this patch allows to unconditionally skip the check
> on LoongArch.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1963
> Signed-off-by: WANG Rui 

Thanks, applied.

___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec


Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix an issue with relocatable vmlinux

2023-11-25 Thread Huacai Chen
Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen 

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 4:54 PM WANG Rui  wrote:
>
> Normally vmlinux for LoongArch is of ET_EXEC type, while if built with
> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE (this is PIE) and Clang, it will be of ET_DYN type.
> Meanwhile, physical address field of segments in vmlinux has actually
> the same value as virtual address field.
>
> Similar to arm64, this patch allows to unconditionally skip the check
> on LoongArch.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1963
> Signed-off-by: WANG Rui 
> ---
>  kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c b/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
> index bea7b3e..b337642 100644
> --- a/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
> +++ b/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
> @@ -39,12 +39,13 @@ static int get_elf_exec_load_base(struct mem_ehdr *ehdr, 
> struct kexec_info *info
> unsigned long first, last;
> size_t i;
>
> -   /* Note on arm64:
> +   /* Note on arm64 and loongarch64:
>  * arm64's vmlinux has virtual address in physical address
>  * field of PT_LOAD segments. So the following validity check
>  * and relocation makes no sense on arm64.
> +* This is also applies to LoongArch.
>  */
> -   if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_AARCH64)
> +   if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_AARCH64 || ehdr->e_machine == EM_LOONGARCH)
> return 0;
>
> first = ULONG_MAX;
> --
> 2.43.0
>

___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec


[PATCH] LoongArch: Fix an issue with relocatable vmlinux

2023-11-24 Thread WANG Rui
Normally vmlinux for LoongArch is of ET_EXEC type, while if built with
CONFIG_RELOCATABLE (this is PIE) and Clang, it will be of ET_DYN type.
Meanwhile, physical address field of segments in vmlinux has actually
the same value as virtual address field.

Similar to arm64, this patch allows to unconditionally skip the check
on LoongArch.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1963
Signed-off-by: WANG Rui 
---
 kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c b/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
index bea7b3e..b337642 100644
--- a/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
+++ b/kexec/kexec-elf-exec.c
@@ -39,12 +39,13 @@ static int get_elf_exec_load_base(struct mem_ehdr *ehdr, 
struct kexec_info *info
unsigned long first, last;
size_t i;
 
-   /* Note on arm64:
+   /* Note on arm64 and loongarch64:
 * arm64's vmlinux has virtual address in physical address
 * field of PT_LOAD segments. So the following validity check
 * and relocation makes no sense on arm64.
+* This is also applies to LoongArch.
 */
-   if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_AARCH64)
+   if (ehdr->e_machine == EM_AARCH64 || ehdr->e_machine == EM_LOONGARCH)
return 0;
 
first = ULONG_MAX;
-- 
2.43.0


___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec