Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] Move $(LIBS) on the end
* Yinghai Lu [2008-08-26 01:21]: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Bernhard Walle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) kexec/Makefile |3 +-- To make static compilation work with LDFLAGS=-static ./configure make thanks. can you put that two lines into INSTALL. Adding is not possible since there is no such file. However, I hacked a small INSTALL file now, I hope that's ok, see the next patch mail. Bernhard -- Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development ___ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] Move $(LIBS) on the end
* Yinghai Lu [2008-08-26 01:40]: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Bernhard Walle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Yinghai Lu [2008-08-26 01:21]: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Bernhard Walle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) kexec/Makefile |3 +-- To make static compilation work with LDFLAGS=-static ./configure make thanks. can you put that two lines into INSTALL. Adding is not possible since there is no such file. However, I hacked a small INSTALL file now, I hope that's ok, see the next patch mail. there is one in the git tree http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/horms/kexec-tools.git;a=blob;f=INSTALL;h=e422868c2b9411c38949dd605d674455f96f1ae2;hb=HEAD Ah, I didn't notice because I used the tarball to create that patch ... I now merged the two and wrote a patch to actually include that INSTALL file in the tarball. Bernhard -- Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development ___ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] Move $(LIBS) on the end
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:16:49AM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote: 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) kexec/Makefile |3 +-- To make static compilation work with LDFLAGS=-static ./configure make we have to move $(LIBS) on the end of the compiler line. Static compilation has been requested by Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Although I don't see the practical benefit in most cases, I don't think we should not support it. Since kexec does not use name resolution functions of libc, it's valid to use static linking. Tested on x86_64-suse-linux. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. I agree that static is entirely sensible for kexec-tools. Applied ___ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
