Re: [lace] lace-exhibition and new website

2004-05-18 Thread Jean Barrett
Hi Liduina and All,
What a lovely site. I have only just now had time to take a proper look 
at it. There was a lovely surprise waiting fro me as well. In the 
Vitrine which is in  the Hotel de Ville I recognised my design for the 
Christmas candles. What a thrill. It is well worth sending patterns to 
magazines,  when you find that at least one other lacemaker thinks your 
pattern worth recreating. Thank you.
Jean in Cleveland U.K.
On 16 May 2004, at 07:28, Liduina wrote:

Hello everyone,
Our lace group celebrated his 20th anniversary last week and on this
occasion we had a lace exhibition.
We also opened a little website to present our group, which sort of 
lace we
make, our activities and the history of lace in our town (Ath in 
Belgium),
it's only in french but there are also many pictures.
The pictures of our exhibition also are on the site : 
www.athdentelle.be .
It's the very beginning of the site and we have to add  some more
informations on it, so we'd be very pleased if you have some advices to
ameliorate it.

Liduina from a sunny Ath in Belgium.
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace] Brok 36/2 thread comparison

2004-05-18 Thread Mark, aka Tatman
Hi all,
  I will be doing the Springett torchon fan and it calls for 36/2 Brok
thread and also Gold Dust(not sure what that is other than a metallic).  I
don't have the Brok or Gold Dust and would like to find the equivalent.  I
do have Tanne size 30 and 50 and Egyptian Cotton size 60/2.  And in my
tatting thread stash I have TONS of size 70-80 tatting cotton and also some
finer threads like Corona Cotton size 100 and 160(very strong cotton cord
perfect for tatting).  I still have a long way to go to build up my BLacing
thread stash.  Just doesn't seem to overlap my tatting thread stash LOL!

Any and all suggestions would be appreciated.

Happy Lacing!

Mark, aka Tatman
www.tat-man.net
Greenville, IL  USA

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [lace] Brok 36/2 thread comparison

2004-05-18 Thread Scotlace
According to Brenda's book the following are similar to Brok - i.e. 
32wraps/cm

Fresia 100/2
Barbour Campbell Irish linen lace thread 130
Knox's Falcon 70
Amann Coats sylko 50
Best Linen lace thread no70
Colcoton 70/2
Czech sewing thread, Triana
DMC Cordonnet 100
DMC Broder machine 30
DMC Turbino Tissus legers
Eagley sewing machine thread Art no K125
Filato per Tombola di Cantu 40
Mettler Stickgarn 30
Molnyloke cotton (white reel for sewing machine)
Radix mercerised no 50
De Vere gassed cotton 40/2


Goldrush + 12wraps/cm

Madeira metallic no 3
Madeira glamour no 8
Kreinik Japan no 7
Twilleys gold dust 20

Hope this helps

Patricia in Wales
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace] Lacemaking supplies - for tape lace addicts

2004-05-18 Thread Jane Partridge
Following on from my response to Sulochona's query as to who was Tom in
Belgium, I had the following reply from him - confirming they still sell
the tapes, but not shown on their website. I cannot say I have come
across any other suppliers of black tape, and the black tape I bought
some seven years ago was fine enough for Branscombe.

  --- Forwarded message follows ---
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom
Deleenheer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Dear Jane,

Thank you for your e-mail. We indeed still sell the lace tapes in all sizes
and colors. Basically, we call the battenberg lace tape. They come in white,
cream and black. Also gold and silver are available. They are not on thje
website anymore, though.

Please let me know what you need.

Best regards,

Tom
___
Sequoia Enterprises : Belgian Lace, Tapestries  Home Decor
Daal 32 B, 9450 Denderhoutem, Belgium
Tel : ++ 32.(0)53.848680  Fax : ++ 32.(0)53.848661
www.belgian-lace.com
www.belgiantapestries.com
www.european-decor.com
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Jane Partridge

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [lace] Brok 36/2 thread comparison

2004-05-18 Thread Brenda Paternoster
Mark
Brok 36/2 is just about mid way between the two sizes of Tanne that you 
have.  Egyptian cotton 60/2 is very similar to the Tanne 50.  The 
tatting cottons are marginally thicker, but if they are double spun 
(DMC Special Dentelles etc) the lace will be crisper and won't fold so 
well as with Brok.

Twilley's Gold Dust is a thick metallic thread - the type that is made 
like a very  long length of crochet chain (US single crochet?).  If you 
pull at the end it will unravel.

Brenda
On 18 May 2004, at 17:29, Mark, aka Tatman wrote:
  I will be doing the Springett torchon fan and it calls for 36/2 Brok
thread and also Gold Dust(not sure what that is other than a 
metallic).  I
don't have the Brok or Gold Dust and would like to find the 
equivalent.  I
do have Tanne size 30 and 50 and Egyptian Cotton size 60/2.  And in my
tatting thread stash I have TONS of size 70-80 tatting cotton and also 
some
finer threads like Corona Cotton size 100 and 160(very strong cotton 
cord
perfect for tatting).  I still have a long way to go to build up my 
BLacing
thread stash.  Just doesn't seem to overlap my tatting thread stash 
LOL!

Brenda
http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/paternoster/
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


re: [lace] lace exhibition and strange tool

2004-05-18 Thread Bev Walker
T. wrote

 Like Lorri (Ferguson), I'm burning to know what the strange
 instrument(tool?) of Dominique's (in the Dentelieres section) is; it
 looks like *nothing* I've ever seen before in connection with BL...
 There seems to be no pricking and no pillow at all; just a tube with
 lots and lots of bobbins hanging from it.

B. thinks the lacemaker is making a 3D lace and the tube is the pillow
;)  Ambitious isn't it! and delicate.

bye for now
Bev on a sunny day in Sooke BC (west coast of Canada)

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace] Re: Brok 36/2 thread comparison

2004-05-18 Thread Mark, aka Tatman
Thank you all that made suggestions on what to use.  Will come in handy for
other thread comparisons as well.  This group is GREAT!!  and fast with the
responses ;)

Mark, aka Tatman
www.tat-man.net
Greenville, IL USA

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [lace] Brok 36/2 thread comparison

2004-05-18 Thread Samrah
I know I need Brenda's book, but as I am just starting the book list is really long.  
How does Brok 36/2 compare to Brokman's 35/3?  I know we are dealing with 2 ply vs. 3 
ply, but are they close in size?

Thanks ever so much guys,
Cinde


-
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace] thread

2004-05-18 Thread Janice Blair
Hi Mark,
From the list that Patricia sent to Arachne you may not know that Mettler Stickgarn 
30 is available in some fabric shops, try quilting shops if your local store does not 
stock it.  There is a mass of colors available and also different sizes.  Some of 
thre thread is silk covered and has a nice sheen.  Make sure you check for 30 or 60 
on the tube.
 
Hobby Lobby and Michaels might have the Krienek or if you have an embroidery shop 
nearby try them for the glittery stuff, or even a shop that sells sewing machines have 
all sorts of thread these days for the embroidery machines.  Hope you can find 
something local instead of having to mail order.
Janice


Janice Blair
Crystal Lake, 50 miles northwest of Chicago, Illinois, USA

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [lace] Brok 36/2 thread comparison

2004-05-18 Thread Samrah
Yep, Bockens, I oopsed!
 
Thanks again,
Cinde



-
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace] Re: lFantasy Flowers

2004-05-18 Thread Karolina Jeffers
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 15:19:17 +1000
From: W  N Lafferty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [lace] Fantasy flowers

Just heard Rosemary Shepherd is away overseas for three months, so
will not be answering mail direct.

If anyone wants a copy of Fantasy Flowers, I know for sure Margaret
at Kiparra (phone 02 4578 1578) has a stock of them in case anyone
wants one before Rosemary gets back.

Noelene in Cooma
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~nlafferty/


Hello Noelene and all,

I had a look at Rosemary's web site and her new book.  The flowers remind me
of Jana Novak's book Fri Knipling particularly the Five petals  and
Hearflower  - these are not even adaptations. Rosemary's other flowers
closely resemble Jana Novak's flowers and I would say are adaptations. We
had a great debate what an adaptation is and came up with a guideline for
lacemakers - in bobbin lace an acceptable adaptation requires a
significant alteration to the design. Whilst many people respect the
original designers sadly some people don't.  I think that we have to be fair
to people who come up with great ideas originally. If we wish to change or
adapt the pattern we should acknowledge the original designer ie - adapted
by ...from the original design by 
Rosemary does the Fantasy Flowers workshops. I attended one and was
surprised than how closely the flowers resembled Jana's flowers. I do not
know if Rosemary has permission from Jana to use her flowers for teaching
purposes but publishing a book is another story.
I do not like to spoil the excitement but we need to support the original
designers so they keep keeping on and produce more great patterns for us to
use.

Karolina Jeffers
Three times Proficiency qualified teacher

From sunny Melbourne where winter is knocking on our door.

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace] eye candy - antique clothes

2004-05-18 Thread Alice Howell
If you like to browse antique clothes -- many with lace on them -- take a 
look at this webpage:  http://www.bobbydene.com/

Have fun,
Alice in Oregon
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace] Re: Fantasy Flowers

2004-05-18 Thread Tamara P. Duvall
On May 18, 2004, at 23:18, Karolina Jeffers (do we have another Pole 
here? g) wrote:

I had a look at Rosemary's web site and her new book.  The flowers 
remind me
of Jana Novak's book Fri Knipling particularly the Five petals  and
Hearflower  - these are not even adaptations. Rosemary's other 
flowers
closely resemble Jana Novak's flowers and I would say are adaptations. 
We
had a great debate what an adaptation is and came up with a guideline 
for
lacemakers - in bobbin lace an acceptable adaptation requires a
significant alteration to the design. Whilst many people respect the
original designers sadly some people don't.  I think that we have to 
be fair
to people who come up with great ideas originally. If we wish to 
change or
adapt the pattern we should acknowledge the original designer ie - 
adapted
by ...from the original design by 
I agree 100% (being a bit of a designer myself). But I'm also aware 
that there's another factor...

Some people seem to design the exactly same thing, at almost exactly 
the same time, for all they're continents apart... Serendipity (though 
Deborah Robinson, the Editor of Lace, had a better term for it. If 
only I could remember in which issue, or what the term was... g 
Something to do with the pool of underlying pool of human knowledge...) 
We all tend to re-invent, unwittingly, the wheel once in a while, 
especially if we practice our lacemaking in -- more-or-less -- 
isolation... As is common in very large countries, and/or where people 
make lace for pleasure not for profit.

So, maybe, that's what's happened here too, and it's a case of not 
proven rather than guilty... :) I don't design in Torchon (where 
un-intentional duplication is almost inevitable) but, even so, with 
every pattern I send out for publication, I agonize: *has* someone else 
come up with something, so very similiar as to make my own pattern a 
plagiarism, *before* I had? I don't own all the lacemaking 
books/magazines which had been published over the many years (and, even 
if I had, I might forget I'd seen something similiar before)...

Rosemary does the Fantasy Flowers workshops. I attended one and was
surprised than how closely the flowers resembled Jana's flowers.
Did you mention it to her at the time? What did she say?
I've never seen Jana Novak's book myself, so, to me, Rosemary's Fantasy 
Flowers were brand new (and I've marked it as something I'd like to 
own one day, if only to look at, digest and, possibly, take into 
another direction)... I agree, someone publishing (a pattern, a book) 
or teaching a workshop should not use another person's patterns without 
an acknowledgment *and* the original designer's permission... But... 
*What* if it's done without any ill-intent?

---
Tamara P Duvall http://lorien.emufarm.org/~tpd
Lexington, Virginia, USA (Formerly of Warsaw, Poland)
  Healthy US through The No-CARB Diet:
no C-heney, no A-shcroft, no R-umsfeld, no B-ush.
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [lace] Re: lFantasy Flowers

2004-05-18 Thread Ruth Budge
I'm not able to comment on these opinions, as I'm not familiar with either book
- but I do think it is most unfair to make accusations like this when Rosemary
is out of the country and can't defend herself.

Ruth Budge (Sydney, Australia)

Karolina Jeffers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a look at Rosemary's web site and her new book. The flowers remind me
of Jana Novak's book Fri Knipling particularly the Five petals and
Hearflower - these are not even adaptations. Rosemary's other flowers
closely resemble Jana Novak's flowers and I would say are adaptations...

Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace-chat] Help - What's an ISDN Device?

2004-05-18 Thread Joan Whitfield
I deleted what I thought were some unnecessary shortcuts on the desktop and
now every time I switch the computer on a warning message pops up telling me
I need to install an ISDN device and run the configuration wizard.  I'm
hoping that one of you experts can tell me how.  Very grateful for any help.
Joan from Yorkshire

To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [lace-chat] :) Fwd: proof that girls are evil (fwd)

2004-05-18 Thread Thelacebee
In a message dated 18/05/2004 05:31:36 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

 http://www.anvari.org/fun/Gender/Proof_that_Girls_are_Evil.html
 
 ---
 Tamara P Duvallhttp://lorien.emufarm.org/~tpd

Being a mathematician - I am sorry to say that the mathematical equations are 
absolutely correct and that it does appear that I am evil.

Thanks alot Tamara!

Regards

Liz Beecher
I'm blogging now - see what it's all about

To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fw: [lace-chat] :) Fwd: proof that girls are evil

2004-05-18 Thread Sue Babbs
The quote 'Money is the root of all evil' is incorrect, if that helps. The
actual quote says that 'the love of money is the root of all evil'

Then the initial supposition is not always correct - with the right man,
money is not necessary, just a bonus!
Sue
- Original Message - 
 Math's not my strong point, so I'm can't refute this myself, much as I
 would like to; hope someone else will be able to do it for me. All *I*
 can do is object to the + (plus) looking like an x (times)...
 
 http://www.anvari.org/fun/Gender/Proof_that_Girls_are_Evil.html


To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace-chat] Re: :) Fwd: proof that girls are evil (fwd)

2004-05-18 Thread Clay Blackwell
Well, dear one, you may rest that objection.  The formula
requires it to be a X, not  a plus.

The way we know that is the line, money times money equals
money squared
The next line says, money is the (square) root of (all)
evil
and therefore...  etc., etc.

Clay

- Original Message - 
From: Tamara P. Duvall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: chat Arachne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 12:30 AM
Subject: :) Fwd: proof that girls are evil (fwd)


 Math's not my strong point, so I'm can't refute this
myself, much as I
 would like to; hope someone else will be able to do it for
me. All *I*
 can do is object to the + (plus) looking like an x
(times)...

  From: D.D.


http://www.anvari.org/fun/Gender/Proof_that_Girls_are_Evil.html

 ---
 Tamara P Duvall http://lorien.emufarm.org/~tpd
 Lexington, Virginia, USA (Formerly of Warsaw, Poland)
Healthy US through The No-CARB Diet:
  no C-heney, no A-shcroft, no R-umsfeld, no B-ush.


To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace-chat] Re: :) Fwd: proof that girls are evil (fwd)

2004-05-18 Thread Tamara P. Duvall
On May 18, 2004, at 9:00, Clay Blackwell wrote:
Well, dear one, you may rest that objection.  The formula requires it 
to be a X, not  a plus.
The way we know that is the line, money times money equals money 
squared
My objection is to the first x, which *should have been* a +... I quote 
from the site:
First we state that girls that girls require time *and* money. 
Girls=Time x Money.

Last I heard, and  meant plus, not times. So, time and money 
should have been written out as Time + Money.  The rest of the 
proof falls flat on its face because, as Robin Panza said (she's not 
on chat, sent the message privately):

Money + Money = double money, not money squared.  So the initial 
equation is incorrect--it says Girls are time times money, not 
Girls require time and money.
So, OK. We *start* with a sloppily written equation (never mind the - 
rather dubious - supposition that *girls* require time and money. And 
boys don't?). We follow it up with another blooper. As Sue Babbs 
pointed out:

The quote 'Money is the root of all evil' is incorrect, if that helps. 
The
actual quote says that 'the love of money is the root of all evil'
So, the proof is invalid on *two* counts, not just one :)   Yet...
Weronika Patena (a student at Cal Tech) wrote:
Not refutable, other than the absolute value comment someone already
added on the same page.  Which, by the way, means that either girls =
evil or girls = -evil, so it's not that bad g
And Liz Beecher wrote:
Being a mathematician - I am sorry to say that the mathematical 
equations are
absolutely correct and that it does appear that I am evil.
Seems to me, if you include my own objection to a wrong sign being 
used, it's:
Language Arts: 3, Mathematics: 0.  g Robin, who spotted the mistake 
in translation (from English to math language), is a scientist 
herself, but of the generation somewhat closer to me in age than either 
Liz or Weronika. I am a little disturbed that the young ones are so 
careless of context, so willing to focus narrowly...

Robin throws in another interesting equation (philosophical, this 
time g):

[...] anything we value requires time and money, so everything of 
value is evil.
I'd put either, rather than and between time and money but, 
otherwise... Food for thought, I think.

http://www.anvari.org/fun/Gender/Proof_that_Girls_are_Evil.html
---
Tamara P Duvall http://lorien.emufarm.org/~tpd
Lexington, Virginia, USA (Formerly of Warsaw, Poland)
  Healthy US through The No-CARB Diet:
no C-heney, no A-shcroft, no R-umsfeld, no B-ush.
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [lace-chat] Re: :) Fwd: proof that girls are evil (fwd)

2004-05-18 Thread Weronika Patena
 My objection is to the first x, which *should have been* a +... I quote 
 from the site:
 First we state that girls that girls require time *and* money. 
 Girls=Time x Money.
 
 Last I heard, and  meant plus, not times. So, time and money 
 should have been written out as Time + Money.  The rest of the 
 proof falls flat on its face because, as Robin Panza said (she's not 
 on chat, sent the message privately):

Actually in math and is times and or is plus.

 The quote 'Money is the root of all evil' is incorrect, if that helps. 
 The
 actual quote says that 'the love of money is the root of all evil'

I don't know, I always heard the version without love. 

 Weronika Patena (a student at Cal Tech) wrote:
 
 Not refutable, other than the absolute value comment someone already
 added on the same page.  Which, by the way, means that either girls =
 evil or girls = -evil, so it's not that bad g
 
 And Liz Beecher wrote:
 
 Being a mathematician - I am sorry to say that the mathematical 
 equations are
 absolutely correct and that it does appear that I am evil.
 
 Seems to me, if you include my own objection to a wrong sign being 
 used, it's:
 Language Arts: 3, Mathematics: 0.  g Robin, who spotted the mistake 
 in translation (from English to math language), is a scientist 
 herself, but of the generation somewhat closer to me in age than either 
 Liz or Weronika. I am a little disturbed that the young ones are so 
 careless of context, so willing to focus narrowly...

Math will do that to you g.

 Robin throws in another interesting equation (philosophical, this 
 time g):
 
 [...] anything we value requires time and money, so everything of 
 value is evil.

Of course g

Weronika

To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[lace-chat] Re: :) Fwd: proof that girls are evil (fwd)

2004-05-18 Thread Tamara P. Duvall
On May 18, 2004, at 20:53, Weronika Patena wrote:
Actually in math and is times and or is plus.
In my school days (40+ yrs ago), and was +, times was x, and or, 
being very indefinite, belonged not to mathemathics, but to philosophy 
(and to history, and to daily budgeting g)

The quote 'Money is the root of all evil' is incorrect, if that 
helps.
The actual quote says that 'the love of money is the root of all 
evil'
I don't know, I always heard the version without love.
Very few of us read The right stuff at all, much less read it 
carefully these days; we're in too much of a hurry... I myself knew the 
original quote, but didn't think to question the one supplied, as 
that's the one in common circulation

---
Tamara P Duvall http://lorien.emufarm.org/~tpd
Lexington, Virginia, USA (Formerly of Warsaw, Poland)
  Healthy US through The No-CARB Diet:
no C-heney, no A-shcroft, no R-umsfeld, no B-ush.
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [lace-chat] Re: :) Fwd: proof that girls are evil (fwd)

2004-05-18 Thread Weronika Patena
 Actually in math and is times and or is plus.
 
 In my school days (40+ yrs ago), and was +, times was x, and or, 
 being very indefinite, belonged not to mathemathics, but to philosophy 
 (and to history, and to daily budgeting g)

Ah, right, I didn't go to school in the US, so I missed this one.  But
in math fields like logic and is multiplication and or is addition, because 1 or 
0 is 1 just like 1+0, and both 1 and 0 and 1*0 are 0. 

 I don't know, I always heard the version without love.
 
 Very few of us read The right stuff at all, much less read it 
 carefully these days; we're in too much of a hurry... I myself knew the 
 original quote, but didn't think to question the one supplied, as 
 that's the one in common circulation

I must say the original version makes much more sense than the common
one.  There's nothing wrong with money, really.  You can buy bobbins
with it g.

Weronika

To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]