Re: [Larceny-users] A very broken error message
David Rush wrote: The transcript below says it all. Yes, the macro is erroneous, but I made this mistake in the middle of a much larger macro definition, and well...cdr: () is not a pair just isn't very informative, although now that I know what went wrong I can see how it would arise. I don't know if this is bad enough to consider a bug, but I did want to raise it in hopes of a better tomorrow :) Thanks! Logged as ticket #589: https://trac.ccs.neu.edu/trac/larceny/ticket/589 Will ___ Larceny-users mailing list Larceny-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
[Larceny-users] A very broken error message
The transcript below says it all. Yes, the macro is erroneous, but I made this mistake in the middle of a much larger macro definition, and well...cdr: () is not a pair just isn't very informative, although now that I know what went wrong I can see how it would arise. I don't know if this is bad enough to consider a bug, but I did want to raise it in hopes of a better tomorrow :) (define-syntax foo (syntax-rules () ((foo bar? ...) (begin bar ... (define-syntax foo (syntax-rules () ((foo bar? ...) (begin bar ... WARNING from macro expander: Redefining foo foo (foo x) (foo x) Error: cdr: () is not a pair. Entering debugger; type ? for help. debug -- GPG Public key at http://cyber-rush.org/drr/gpg-public-key.txt ___ Larceny-users mailing list Larceny-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
