Re: [LARTC] Class C network 223.255.255.x
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:53 +0200, the sew wrote: Nothing wrong with the official, my backbone is expanding quite alot and we adding quite alot of businesses with cables in building, and we use pppoe and radus to asign ip addresses, just looking for a block of addresses that most companies will never use. I assume your connected companies are using routeable ranges? If not, I assume you're doing NAT? In the first case imho there is no reason to not use a valid private range... smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] Shaping per IP in PPPoE borrowing or sharing Uplink or Downlink
helo again. I think this question i am asking is worth: we know that pppoe-server creates a pppX device on each connection done to it. So, when i have to shape, i have to shape each pppX connection device on itself alone. What i know is that the borrowing method on one device by itself, e.g. ppp0, alone using HTB or the like. this means that i have to create for another device, e.g. ppp1, its own HTB or CBQ tree. So, how can i in PPPoE technology setup sharing or borrowing between all the pppX devices so it won't let network starvation problem float on surface? Thanks. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] Shaping per IP in PPPoE borrowing or sharing Uplink or Downlink
Hello again Rani, : helo again. I think this question i am asking is worth: : : we know that pppoe-server creates a pppX device on each : connection done to it. So, when i have to shape, i have to shape : each pppX connection device on itself alone. What i know is that : the borrowing method on one device by itself, e.g. ppp0, alone : using HTB or the like. this means that i have to create for : another device, e.g. ppp1, its own HTB or CBQ tree. : : So, how can i in PPPoE technology setup sharing or borrowing : between all the pppX devices so it won't let network starvation : problem float on surface? You should probably consider IMQ [0] or the new-ish IFB [1]. With either tool, you'll be able to create a traffic control structure which spans multiple output devices. Good luck, -Martin [0] IMQ = Intermediate Queuing Device http://www.linuximq.net/ http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.imq.html http://wiki.nix.hu/cgi-bin/twiki/view/IMQ/HowToInstall [1] IFB = Intermediate Functional Block http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2006q2/018641.html http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=113674224714758w=2 -- Martin A. Brown --- Wonderfrog Enterprises --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
