Re: [LARTC] Re: List fault?

2011-11-24 Thread Kilian Krause 
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 00:12 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Grant Taylor,
> 
> Am 2011-05-04 14:24:17, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
> > >I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
> > >take over this one.
> > 
> > (I'll make this pitch again.)
> > 
> > Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
> > so that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed
> > back to the mailing list (as a discussion list)?
> 
> For WHAT?  Real MTAs have  byside  and 
> 
> > All in favor?
> > Any one against?
> 
> Yes.

Sorry guys, but I have to support Michelle here and refrain that anyone
not familiar with the "Reply-To" problem in the context of mailinglists
do a quick google on "Reply To munging". It's really just some ugly
workaround for old/broken MUA to set Reply-To for a mailinglist pointing
back to itself. 

Please don't!

-- 
Best regards,
Kilian

___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] Re: List fault?

2011-05-04 Thread Don Gould 
I'm all for just seeing if we can get to the list admin and just get the 
existing list back up to scratch.


Who is the list admin?

Do we just need a new admin or supporter?  Has the existing person just 
got past being able to do the role (ie busy with work, family, what ever 
:) )


D
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc