Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
Do you mean the actual SVN or my Patch? I tested my patch against a small test project (Prj + 2 units + 1 include file). The only TODO's that don't make it in the list are the ones in the .inc file. Regards, Gerard. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
Hi, Do you mean the actual SVN or my Patch? Sorry, I meant the default code in Lazarus SVN, not your patch. Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
I think it doesn't load the includes because it parses the include file name, but passes it as it is without path to the loading routine, so the file cannot be loaded. Any idea where I can get the current project path? Regards, Gerard. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
[lazarus] Free method of any object didn't executes.
For example i do the following: Ser := TSerie.Create(Chart1); Ser.Free; I set breakpoint in implementation of TSerie.Destroy. Neither the debugger stops on breakpoint nor the debugger steps into implementation of Free or Destroy. Is it bug or feature ? -- 12 12 aka skywriter _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Free method of any object didn't executes.
12 12 wrote: For example i do the following: Ser := TSerie.Create(Chart1); Ser.Free; I set breakpoint in implementation of TSerie.Destroy. Neither the debugger stops on breakpoint nor the debugger steps into implementation of Free or Destroy. Is it bug or feature ? Perhaps you didn't place an override; after the destroy declaration neither saw the warning the compiler issued to you. -- Joao Morais _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Free method of any object didn't executes.
12 12 wrote: For example i do the following: Ser := TSerie.Create(Chart1); Ser.Free; I set breakpoint in implementation of TSerie.Destroy. Neither the debugger stops on breakpoint nor the debugger steps into implementation of Free or Destroy. Is it bug or feature ? What does this message have to do with the Enhanced TODO list? Could you please start a new thread rather than just arbitrarily replying to some other message? It makes finding topics and their resulting threads much easier and you will more likely get an appropriate answer. As for your question, how do you know that your code snippet actually gets called in the first place? Try turning off optimizations and see if that helps. Gus _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Is possible load a DLL at design time?
Raistware wrote: Hi all! In our company we are thinking to migrate from Delphi 7 and Delphi 2007 to Lazarus. But we need some third party components that are distributed as a DLL. So, is it possible to load a DLL at Lazarus runtime? Lazarus supports loading DLLs at the execution of the project? Thanks a lot! At runtime or design-time ? Please clarify. Boguslaw _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Is possible load a DLL at design time?
Bogusław Brandys escribió: Raistware wrote: Hi all! In our company we are thinking to migrate from Delphi 7 and Delphi 2007 to Lazarus. But we need some third party components that are distributed as a DLL. So, is it possible to load a DLL at Lazarus runtime? Lazarus supports loading DLLs at the execution of the project? Thanks a lot! At runtime or design-time ? Please clarify. Boguslaw Hello! Well, we don't have the sources of the component, we only have a set of DLL and a few OCX files, the redistributable files. Also we have a few precompiled DCU and PAS files, the .pas files are only linkers to DLLs, and a DPK and DPROJ files, the Delphi package and project files to install the component, but I think that this doesn't will work for Lazarus. The component's name is Combit ListLabel. The questions: Is it possible to install this component at Lazarus? What can we do to install the component at Lazarus? _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Is possible load a DLL at design time?
Hi Raistware, For now the components in Lazarus are linked static. There is a FPC compiler miss-support for doing them dinamically. It is a purposed feature for FPC team. The DLL's only (excluding the component part) are possible to load with no issue. If you are affraid of that, you may create still the component and make a proxy function to export your control (I know, is not a solution) and use it as the coresponding control in Lazarus. (hint: every control has the Handle property which corresponds to the Windows' HWND ID) but no guarantees about the behavior. You may still wait until it gets integrated to the FPC compiler that feature, or you may compile first statically, and use as is, adding firstly to Lazarus IDE, and lately you may import project with (hopefully) no issue. Hope that helps, Ciprian On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 17:16 +0100, Raistware wrote: Bogusław Brandys escribió: Raistware wrote: Hi all! In our company we are thinking to migrate from Delphi 7 and Delphi 2007 to Lazarus. But we need some third party components that are distributed as a DLL. So, is it possible to load a DLL at Lazarus runtime? Lazarus supports loading DLLs at the execution of the project? Thanks a lot! At runtime or design-time ? Please clarify. Boguslaw Hello! Well, we don't have the sources of the component, we only have a set of DLL and a few OCX files, the redistributable files. Also we have a few precompiled DCU and PAS files, the .pas files are only linkers to DLLs, and a DPK and DPROJ files, the Delphi package and project files to install the component, but I think that this doesn't will work for Lazarus. The component's name is Combit ListLabel. The questions: Is it possible to install this component at Lazarus? What can we do to install the component at Lazarus? _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Free method of any object didn't executes.
- Original Message - From: Gus Wirth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lazarus@miraclec.com Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 08:34 Subject: Re: [lazarus] Free method of any object didn't executes. 12 12 wrote: For example i do the following: Ser := TSerie.Create(Chart1); Ser.Free; I set breakpoint in implementation of TSerie.Destroy. Neither the debugger stops on breakpoint nor the debugger steps into implementation of Free or Destroy. Is it bug or feature ? What does this message have to do with the Enhanced TODO list? Could you please start a new thread rather than just arbitrarily replying to some other message? It makes finding topics and their resulting threads much easier and you will more likely get an appropriate answer. As for your question, how do you know that your code snippet actually gets called in the first place? Try turning off optimizations and see if that helps. Gus I believe if you look at the subject line you will discover that he did start a new thread. Jeff _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Free method of any object didn't executes.
On 06/11/2007, Jeff Steinkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe if you look at the subject line you will discover that he did start a new thread. it doesn't help just changing the subject. if you look at the headers of his email, you'll note the references header. mail clients use this to display mails in a threaded manner. his email is thus grouped under the Enhanced TODO list patch thread. the right thing to do is to create a new message if you intend to start a new thread, not to reply to an existing message. Jeff henry _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
[lazarus] What do you thing of this ?
Do you think this is a good initiative ? Would it be in the community interest to standardize Office formats as ISO ? http://www.noooxml.org/petition Razvan _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:30:33 +0100 Gerard N/A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I have the .inc thing fixed, as long as it is in the project's directory. 1. Can you create a patch? See http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Creating_A_Patch 2. Don't use implementation uses sections in the IDE. 3. Don't load source files from disk. Always use CodeToolBoss.LoadFile(CleanAndExpandFilename(Filename),true,false). 4. Why only for the project directory? 5. Why not use the existing functions to get all units and include files of projects/packages? 6. Why not use the existing comment parsing code? It is faster and not limited to single line comments. Maybe you can describe, what todos the ToDo dialog should maintain? Mattias _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] What do you thing of this ?
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: Do you think this is a good initiative ? Would it be in the community interest to standardize Office formats as ISO ? http://www.noooxml.org/petition If you look at it, you'll see that many FPC devels have signed it already. The idea is that there is already a ISO standard (the OpenOffice one) and that there should be only 1 standard. There is no need for a second one. M$ just tries to avoid having to write a import/export routine by registering their own format as a standard. Michael. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] What do you thing of this ?
Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto: On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: Do you think this is a good initiative ? Would it be in the community interest to standardize Office formats as ISO ? http://www.noooxml.org/petition If you look at it, you'll see that many FPC devels have signed it already. The idea is that there is already a ISO standard (the OpenOffice one) and that there should be only 1 standard. There is no need for a second one. M$ just tries to avoid having to write a import/export routine by registering their own format as a standard. The revers of the coin is: how can it be registered as an ISO standard and remain proprietary at the same time? Or I'm missing a point? -- Giuliano Colla Whenever people agree with me, I always feel I must be wrong (O. Wilde) _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] What do you thing of this ?
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Giuliano Colla wrote: Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto: On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: Do you think this is a good initiative ? Would it be in the community interest to standardize Office formats as ISO ? http://www.noooxml.org/petition If you look at it, you'll see that many FPC devels have signed it already. The idea is that there is already a ISO standard (the OpenOffice one) and that there should be only 1 standard. There is no need for a second one. M$ just tries to avoid having to write a import/export routine by registering their own format as a standard. The revers of the coin is: how can it be registered as an ISO standard and remain proprietary at the same time? Or I'm missing a point? Why have 2 standards ? Michael. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
Hi, 1. Can you create a patch? See http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Creating_A_Patch Sure. 2. Don't use implementation uses sections in the IDE. Ok. 3. Don't load source files from disk. Always use CodeToolBoss.LoadFile(CleanAndExpandFilename(Filename),true,false). Ok, I'll correct this. (I didn't touch this). 4. Why only for the project directory? Sheer ignorance of any alternative method. 5. Why not use the existing functions to get all units and include files of projects/packages? See above. Do you mean to parse all the units used by a project including the LCL? 6. Why not use the existing comment parsing code? It is faster and not limited to single line comments. Any hint on how to do this? More in general, can you point me to a some high level description of the IDE structure and services? Maybe you can describe, what todos the ToDo dialog should maintain? Any Todo displayed by the list? I'm sorry but I think I don't understand the question. BTW, I'm not the original author of the Todo list/Add Todo Item dialog, I just added some functionality, so it's hard for me to answer questions about the design of these. Regards, Gerard. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] What do you thing of this ?
Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto: On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Giuliano Colla wrote: Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto: On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote: Do you think this is a good initiative ? Would it be in the community interest to standardize Office formats as ISO ? http://www.noooxml.org/petition If you look at it, you'll see that many FPC devels have signed it already. The idea is that there is already a ISO standard (the OpenOffice one) and that there should be only 1 standard. There is no need for a second one. M$ just tries to avoid having to write a import/export routine by registering their own format as a standard. The revers of the coin is: how can it be registered as an ISO standard and remain proprietary at the same time? Or I'm missing a point? Why have 2 standards ? Because one is good, and one allows BG to make some extra money to buy his bread and butter. But if M$ request of standardizing their shitty thing can be used to show that they can't have it both ways, then why not to take the opportunity? However I signed the petition, just to stay on the safe side. Giuliano -- Giuliano Colla Whenever people agree with me, I always feel I must be wrong (O. Wilde) _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] What do you thing of this ?
Please read also this: http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/92735 It's not only that MS-OOXML is useless. There is the usual MS strategy behind. Their goal is to became MS-OOXML as an standard and after to make all its users dependend on MS (because some important parts are not open). Read perhaps also this: http://blog.janik.cz/archives/2007/05/19/T20_32_07/ -- Albert Am Dienstag, den 06.11.2007, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Razvan Adrian Bogdan: Do you think this is a good initiative ? Would it be in the community interest to standardize Office formats as ISO ? http://www.noooxml.org/petition Razvan _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] help for Scanline exemple
2007/11/6, Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED]: wile64 wrote: Hi, I use the example Scanline to change an image with the alpha channel as well. alphaTransparent = 0; alphaOpaque = 255; IntfImage.CopyPixels(ScanLineImage); what is the Description of IntfImage ? Does it have an Aplha channel ? see the Scanline example ;-) ScanLineImage:=TLazIntfImage.Create(0,0); ImgFormatDescription.Init_BPP32_B8G8R8_BIO_TTB(30,20); ScanLineImage.DataDescription:=ImgFormatDescription; MyBitmap.LoadFromIntfImage(IntfImage); Why not loading from ScanLineImage ? I change several images and load since ScanLineImage directly, there is plenty of evidence of previous file Canvas.Draw(10,10,MyBitmap); I think ths should work. Yes, but not transparency! The problem is that I have no transparency with this method. How to give transparency to MyBitmap? Marc Thanks Marc, -- Laurent. Soon -LAZTUCE- French Forum : http://lazforum-fr.tuxfamily.org/index.php
Re: [lazarus] help for Scanline exemple
wile64 wrote: Hi, I use the example Scanline to change an image with the alpha channel as well. alphaTransparent = 0; alphaOpaque = 255; IntfImage.CopyPixels(ScanLineImage); what is the Description of IntfImage ? Does it have an Aplha channel ? MyBitmap.LoadFromIntfImage(IntfImage); Why not loading from ScanLineImage ? Canvas.Draw(10,10,MyBitmap); I think ths should work. The problem is that I have no transparency with this method. How to give transparency to MyBitmap? Marc _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
[lazarus] help for Scanline exemple
Hi, I use the example Scanline to change an image with the alpha channel as well. alphaTransparent = 0; alphaOpaque = 255; IntfImage.CopyPixels(ScanLineImage); MyBitmap.LoadFromIntfImage(IntfImage); Canvas.Draw(10,10,MyBitmap); The problem is that I have no transparency with this method. How to give transparency to MyBitmap? Thanks for help, -- Laurent. Soon -LAZTUCE- French Forum : http://lazforum-fr.tuxfamily.org/index.php
Re: [lazarus] help for Scanline exemple
2007/11/6, wile64 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/11/6, Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED]: wile64 wrote: Hi, I use the example Scanline to change an image with the alpha channel as well. alphaTransparent = 0; alphaOpaque = 255; IntfImage.CopyPixels(ScanLineImage); what is the Description of IntfImage ? Does it have an Aplha channel ? see the Scanline example ;-) ScanLineImage:=TLazIntfImage.Create(0,0); ImgFormatDescription.Init_BPP32_B8G8R8_BIO_TTB(30,20); ScanLineImage.DataDescription:=ImgFormatDescription; MyBitmap.LoadFromIntfImage(IntfImage); Why not loading from ScanLineImage ? I change several images and load since ScanLineImage directly, there is plenty of evidence of previous file Canvas.Draw(10,10,MyBitmap); I think ths should work. Yes, but not transparency! The problem is that I have no transparency with this method. How to give transparency to MyBitmap? Marc Thanks Marc, -- Laurent. Soon -LAZTUCE- French Forum : http://lazforum-fr.tuxfamily.org/index.php Sorry, I have modified Description to Init_BPP32_B8G8R8A8_BIO_TTB Thanks, -- Laurent. Soon -LAZTUCE- French Forum : http://lazforum-fr.tuxfamily.org/index.php
Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
On 06/11/2007, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4. Why only for the project directory? 5. Why not use the existing functions to get all units and include files of projects/packages? Mattias, am I understanding you correctly? You want the ToDo list to list all items from all projects and packages at once? I work on 40+ projects (big and small) and definitely don't want the ToDo list to list items form all 40+ projects when I'm only interested in current ProjectX. The last time I tried the ToDo list screen it was quite useless and crashed the IDE repeatedly! It only detected todo items in the LCL code and never in my projects. I'll get a SVN update tomorrow and try out the latest todo dialog - hopefully it has improved since my last attempt. Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] help for Scanline exemple
Sorry, I have modified Description to Init_BPP32_B8G8R8A8_BIO_TTB Thanks, Don't work :-( -- Laurent. Soon -LAZTUCE- French Forum : http://lazforum-fr.tuxfamily.org/index.php -- Laurent. Soon -LAZTUCE- French Forum : http://lazforum-fr.tuxfamily.org/index.php
[lazarus] compiled file size on OS X
Hello, I noticed that my compiled Lazarus programs are huge. I assume they contain debug info or something else that can be stripped. Interestingly, GNU DB debug info is not checked on the Linker tab sheet, but I can debug anyway, within Lazarus. How can I get the binaries smaller? Thanks. Kind Regards, Tobias Giesen _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 23:22:40 +0200 Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06/11/2007, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4. Why only for the project directory? 5. Why not use the existing functions to get all units and include files of projects/packages? Mattias, am I understanding you correctly? You want the ToDo list to list all items from all projects and packages at once? I work on 40+ projects (big and small) and definitely don't want the ToDo list to list items form all 40+ projects when I'm only interested in current ProjectX. Of course not at once. I meant showing ToDo list for all files of a project XOR all files of a package. The last time I tried the ToDo list screen it was quite useless and crashed the IDE repeatedly! It only detected todo items in the LCL code and never in my projects. I'll get a SVN update tomorrow and try out the latest todo dialog - hopefully it has improved since my last attempt. That's why I'm asking what you and any other user want to do with list. What is the goal? At the moment it is merely a showing a few comments as list. I don't understand what the goal of the patch is, but I guess it should extend it to read lots of source files and search for special comments, jump to them and edit them - in short words: make it a useful tool. If this is correct, then some parts should be rewritten (not use TStringLists, not load files directly). Mattias _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] help for Scanline exemple
I found, with Init_BPP32_B8G8R8A8_BIO_TTB and load ScanLineImage, work Ok with Init_BPP32_B8G8R8A8_BIO_TTB and CopyPixels in example don't work, IntfImage.CopyPixels(ScanLineImage); MyBitmap.LoadFromIntfImage(IntfImage); Thanks Marc, -- Laurent. Soon -LAZTUCE- French Forum : http://lazforum-fr.tuxfamily.org/index.php
Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:25:48 +0100 Gerard N/A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, 1. Can you create a patch? See http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Creating_A_Patch Sure. 2. Don't use implementation uses sections in the IDE. Ok. 3. Don't load source files from disk. Always use CodeToolBoss.LoadFile(CleanAndExpandFilename(Filename),true,false). Ok, I'll correct this. (I didn't touch this). 4. Why only for the project directory? Sheer ignorance of any alternative method. 5. Why not use the existing functions to get all units and include files of projects/packages? See above. Do you mean to parse all the units used by a project including the LCL? 6. Why not use the existing comment parsing code? It is faster and not limited to single line comments. Any hint on how to do this? Sure. But I need to know, what you want to achieve. More in general, can you point me to a some high level description of the IDE structure and services? There are wiki pages, examples and some toolbox articles. There is no guide for the IDE source code for various reasons. Maybe you can describe, what todos the ToDo dialog should maintain? Any Todo displayed by the list? I'm sorry but I think I don't understand the question. BTW, I'm not the original author of the Todo list/Add Todo Item dialog, I just added some functionality, so it's hard for me to answer questions about the design of these. That makes two of us. So forget for a moment the existing implementation and write what a good ToDo List dialog should do. Mattias _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] help for Scanline exemple
I found, with Init_BPP32_B8G8R8A8_BIO_TTB and load ScanLineImage, work Ok with Init_BPP32_B8G8R8A8_BIO_TTB and CopyPixels in example don't work, IntfImage.CopyPixels(ScanLineImage); MyBitmap.LoadFromIntfImage(IntfImage); Thanks Marc, -- Laurent. Soon -LAZTUCE- French Forum : http://lazforum-fr.tuxfamily.org/index.php
RE: [lazarus] compiled file size on OS X
Tobias, When I compile the IDE with Carbon I get an executable of 84.5MB. If I run strip on it, this shrinks it to 13.2MB. You can achieve similar reduction without using strip simply by unchecking the -gl switch on the Linker tab. In both cases, the shrunken executable won't have the useful line number information. For now, I always leave this switch checked. Thanks. -Phil -Original Message- From: Tobias Giesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 11/6/2007 6:09 PM To: lazarus@miraclec.com Subject: [lazarus] compiled file size on OS X Hello, I noticed that my compiled Lazarus programs are huge. I assume they contain debug info or something else that can be stripped. Interestingly, GNU DB debug info is not checked on the Linker tab sheet, but I can debug anyway, within Lazarus. How can I get the binaries smaller? Thanks. Kind Regards, Tobias Giesen _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives winmail.dat
[lazarus] Daily Digest option?
Is there a way to get the messages on Lazarus mailing list in a daily digest, instead of single messages? I haven't seen that option at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/modules.php?op=modloadname=StaticPagefile=indexsURL=maill _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
[lazarus] date time picker
i was searched for datetime picker for lazarus on the web, but i didn't find it, did anyone know, where i can find it ?? -- akhmat safrudin linux user : # 457561 ubuntu user : # 18665 http://www.megono.com y!m somat_ori _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
On 07/11/2007, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course not at once.
OK. ;-)
That's why I'm asking what you and any other user want to do with list.
What is the goal?
OK, so here is my wish list which should make it useful for me.
* Search the current open projects source, including .inc files
for ToDo, TODO, #todo tags. It must support multiple tag formats
and maybe have a developer pick their preferred format (see later why)
* Support a category tag. Can't remember how Delphi specified this.
It was something like the following:
{ TODO: Fix year-end calculation. -c Accounting }
* Support a priority tag (1-9): eg: { #todo This must be fixed urgently. -1 }
* Show them in a list.
* List must be sortable by: Unit name, Description, Category and Priority
* Double clicking a item must close the Todo list window and take you to
the location in the source unit.
* ToDo items must be editable from the todo list screen. A simple little
edit dialog for entering a optional category, optional priority and
description
* A nice to have (though not urgent and not even sure if needed) would
be to have some editor keyboard shortcut to bring up a todo list edit
item dialog. So while you are coding and want to insert a item
press the shortcut; fill in the details and press enter to close. The
source code would then have the item inserted in the correct format,
using the developers preferred todo tag format.
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: Failed delivery: Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
Hi, Could somebody please remove this guy from the mailing list subscription! I keep getting bounced messages for every message I send to the list. Regards, - Graeme - On 07/11/2007, Maersk Crew Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Failed delivery: Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch Message from MaerskCrew AutoReply Service. Your mail 'Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch' sent 2007-11-07 06:30:40 did not reach the following recipient(s): Receiver Trzeciak, Grzegorz Zygmunt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is on home leave. Part of original text: On 07/11/2007, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course not at once. OK. ;-) That's why I'm asking what you and any other user want to do with list. What is the goal? OK, so here is my wish list which should make it useful for me. -- Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] date time picker
i was searched for datetime picker for lazarus on the web, but i didn't find it, did anyone know, where i can find it ?? Doesn't Lazarus come with one? I'm not sure what time of date picker you are looking for, but I wrote a while back a popup calendar dialog component to look identical on all platforms we use. If you are interested, I can email you a copy. Just drop a TBitBtn on a form and in it's OnClick event handler call TM2Calendar.Execute(SelectedDate); Simple, but it works. Regards, Graeme. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
[lazarus] shift+enter key = shift+tab key
i used this to change the enter key to tab key : if Key = #13 then begin Key := #0; SelectNext(ActiveControl, true, true); end; but i have some question, how about to change the shift+enter key to shift+tab key. thank's -- akhmat safrudin linux user : # 457561 ubuntu user : # 18665 http://www.megono.com y!m somat_ori _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Enhanced TODO list patch
On 07/11/2007, Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why I'm asking what you and any other user want to do with list.
What is the goal?
OK, so here is my wish list which should make it useful for me.
* Search the current open projects source, including .inc files
for ToDo, TODO, #todo tags. It must support multiple tag formats
and maybe have a developer pick their preferred format (see later why)
* Support a category tag. Can't remember how Delphi specified this.
It was something like the following:
{ TODO: Fix year-end calculation. -c Accounting }
* Support a priority tag (1-9): eg: { #todo This must be fixed urgently.
-1 }
* Show them in a list.
* List must be sortable by: Unit name, Description, Category and Priority
* Double clicking a item must close the Todo list window and take you to
the location in the source unit.
* ToDo items must be editable from the todo list screen. A simple little
edit dialog for entering a optional category, optional priority and
description
* A nice to have (though not urgent and not even sure if needed) would
be to have some editor keyboard shortcut to bring up a todo list edit
item dialog. So while you are coding and want to insert a item
press the shortcut; fill in the details and press enter to close. The
source code would then have the item inserted in the correct format,
using the developers preferred todo tag format.
Another one I only remembered now.
* Assigning a keyboard shortcut to Project - View ToDo List doesn't work.
o It doesn't show the shortcut key combination in the menu.
o I've tried multiple keyboard shortcuts to no avail. eg: F2 or
Ctrl-Shift-T
PS:
I'm using Lazarus v0.9.23 r12561 i386-linux-gtk. Oh by the way, it
seems the ToDo List now detects my 'TODO:' items in my current
projects code (all *.pas files). A few months back it didn't. :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] date time picker
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Doesn't Lazarus come with one? I'm not sure what time of date picker you are looking for, but I wrote a while back a popup calendar dialog component to look identical on all platforms we use. If you are interested, I can email you a copy. Just drop a TBitBtn on a form and in it's OnClick event handler call TM2Calendar.Execute(SelectedDate); Simple, but it works. Regards, Graeme. thank's for attention, but i found it, this is enough for me. -- akhmat safrudin linux user : # 457561 ubuntu user : # 18665 http://www.megono.com y!m somat_ori _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Free method of any object didn't executes.
Henry Vermaak wrote: On 06/11/2007, Jeff Steinkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe if you look at the subject line you will discover that he did start a new thread. it doesn't help just changing the subject. if you look at the headers of his email, you'll note the references header. mail clients use this to display mails in a threaded manner. his email is thus grouped under the Enhanced TODO list patch thread. the right thing to do is to create a new message if you intend to start a new thread, not to reply to an existing message. Jeff henry Thank you for clarify that issue to me.I have always be surprised why some of not related emails jump across an interesting discuss. Regards Boguslaw _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] Free method of any object didn't executes.
the right thing to do is to create a new message if you intend to start a new thread, not to reply to an existing message. Sotty i didn't know this issue. I use web-interface to read and send mails. And i thought it is enough to type new subject for creating new thread. -- 12 12 aka skywriter _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
