[lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt

Hello,

The FPC team has been recently made aware that a number of routines in the
Classes unit are apparently based on code originally from Borland/CodeGear.
After someone found a tool to automatically compare source code bodies to look
for structural similarities, we improved its support for Object Pascal (it's in
svn now) and used it to compare all FPC RTL and FCL units with their Kylix 3
and Delphi 7 equivalents (in so far these exist).

This enabled us to find more cases where code may have originally come from or
be based on Delphi/Kylix code. All such identified routines of sufficient
complexity and/or likeliness have been or are in the process of being rewritten
from scratch using a clean room approach: by someone who is not intimately
familiar with the current implementation, and only based on documentation
written by other people. I am personally supervising this effort.

This whole issue highlights a quite annoying problem though: one the one hand,
it is most certainly our responsibility to ensure that all committed code can be
legally licensed under FPC's modified LGPL license, and in particular does not
originate from Delphi/Kylix sources. On the other hand, we have to avoid reading
Delphi/Kylix code as much as possible since by doing so, we may become tainted
ourselves and unconsciously start writing code which is based too closely on
Borland/CodeGear code.

As everyone knows, we nevertheless all try our best to avoid committing tainted
code, see e.g. the comments attached to the following bug reports:
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=7680
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=8248
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=9770

And yet, from time to time it nevertheless happens anyway:
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=8661

So this is one area where you, our users, can make a big difference and help us
in preventing this from happening in the future, as well as with notifying us as
soon as possible when it does happen (or when you know it happened in the past).
Most importantly: please ensure that you *never* submit patches based on code 
copyrighted by third parties.

Let one thing be clear, however: none of the code that you wrote yourself can be
affected by this issue, as long as this code is not based on the tainted code
(whereby based means based on their source code; it does not mean, a.o.,
deriving from a tainted class, or calling a tainted routine -- in these cases
your own code is clean). Simply recompiling your program with an untainted
version of FPC will automatically clear your programs of any taint as well.

We are in a constructive dialog with people from CodeGear over this issue, and
will report back later on the repercussions as far as current and previous FPC
releases are concerned. 

For the FPC Team,

Michael.

PS: for those interested, here is the preliminary list of tainted routines we
have identified. If you are aware of more cases, please let us know as soon as
possible so we can evaluate them and put them in the queue for 
re-implementation!

Classes:
* ExtractStrings
* TParser.TokenComponentIdent
* TParser.NextToken
* TReader.DoFixupReferences
* TReader.ReadCollection
* TReader.FindComponentClass
* TWriter.WriteComponent
* TWriter.WriteComponentData
* TWriter.WriteProperties
* TPropFixup.MakeGlobalReference
* FindNestedComponent
* GlobalFixupReferences
* GetFixupInstanceNames
* RemoveFixupReferences (RemoveFixups in Delphi),
* RedirectFixupReferences
* GetFixupInstanceNames (GetFixupReferenceNames in Delphi),
* RemoveGlobalFixup
* RemoveFixups
* TStringList.Grow
* TStringList.QuickSort
* TStringList.Find
* TCollection.GetNamePath
* TFPList.Assign (Kylix: tlist.assign)
* TFPList.Delete (Kylix: tlist.delete)
* TList.Extract

Strutils:
* SearchBuf
* DecodeSoundexInt

Varutils:
* DoVarClearArray

Math:
* MomentSkewKurtosis:

Zstream:
* Needs complete re-implementation (was taken from the net...)

Db:
* TDataset.SetFieldValues
* TDataset.DataEvent
* TDataSet.CalculateFields,
* TDataset.EnableControls
* TDataLink.CalcFirstRecord
* TField.RefreshLookupList
* TField.CalcLookupValue

Comctrl:
* HandleSafeCallException

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Bogusław Brandys

Michael Van Canneyt wrote:

Hello,

The FPC team has been recently made aware that a number of routines in the
Classes unit are apparently based on code originally from Borland/CodeGear.
After someone found a tool to automatically compare source code bodies to look
for structural similarities, we improved its support for Object Pascal (it's in
svn now) and used it to compare all FPC RTL and FCL units with their Kylix 3
and Delphi 7 equivalents (in so far these exist).

This enabled us to find more cases where code may have originally come from or
be based on Delphi/Kylix code. All such identified routines of sufficient
complexity and/or likeliness have been or are in the process of being rewritten
from scratch using a clean room approach: by someone who is not intimately
familiar with the current implementation, and only based on documentation
written by other people. I am personally supervising this effort.

This whole issue highlights a quite annoying problem though: one the one hand,
it is most certainly our responsibility to ensure that all committed code can be
legally licensed under FPC's modified LGPL license, and in particular does not
originate from Delphi/Kylix sources. On the other hand, we have to avoid reading
Delphi/Kylix code as much as possible since by doing so, we may become tainted
ourselves and unconsciously start writing code which is based too closely on
Borland/CodeGear code.

As everyone knows, we nevertheless all try our best to avoid committing tainted
code, see e.g. the comments attached to the following bug reports:
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=7680
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=8248
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=9770

And yet, from time to time it nevertheless happens anyway:
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=8661

So this is one area where you, our users, can make a big difference and help us
in preventing this from happening in the future, as well as with notifying us as
soon as possible when it does happen (or when you know it happened in the past).
Most importantly: please ensure that you *never* submit patches based on code 
copyrighted by third parties.


Let one thing be clear, however: none of the code that you wrote yourself can be
affected by this issue, as long as this code is not based on the tainted code
(whereby based means based on their source code; it does not mean, a.o.,
deriving from a tainted class, or calling a tainted routine -- in these cases
your own code is clean). Simply recompiling your program with an untainted
version of FPC will automatically clear your programs of any taint as well.

We are in a constructive dialog with people from CodeGear over this issue, and
will report back later on the repercussions as far as current and previous FPC
releases are concerned. 


For the FPC Team,

Michael.



Let me notice that we are in difficult situation on the other hand: we 
cannot be sure if some of the fpc/lazarus code wasn't used in Delphi , 
right ?
The only way is to check date of publication of our sources and of 
official Delphi sources.


Just my 2 cents.

Boguslaw



PS: for those interested, here is the preliminary list of tainted routines we
have identified. If you are aware of more cases, please let us know as soon as
possible so we can evaluate them and put them in the queue for 
re-implementation!

Classes:
* ExtractStrings
* TParser.TokenComponentIdent
* TParser.NextToken
* TReader.DoFixupReferences
* TReader.ReadCollection
* TReader.FindComponentClass
* TWriter.WriteComponent
* TWriter.WriteComponentData
* TWriter.WriteProperties
* TPropFixup.MakeGlobalReference
* FindNestedComponent
* GlobalFixupReferences
* GetFixupInstanceNames
* RemoveFixupReferences (RemoveFixups in Delphi),
* RedirectFixupReferences
* GetFixupInstanceNames (GetFixupReferenceNames in Delphi),
* RemoveGlobalFixup
* RemoveFixups
* TStringList.Grow
* TStringList.QuickSort
* TStringList.Find
* TCollection.GetNamePath
* TFPList.Assign (Kylix: tlist.assign)
* TFPList.Delete (Kylix: tlist.delete)
* TList.Extract

Strutils:
* SearchBuf
* DecodeSoundexInt

Varutils:
* DoVarClearArray

Math:
* MomentSkewKurtosis:

Zstream:
* Needs complete re-implementation (was taken from the net...)

Db:
* TDataset.SetFieldValues
* TDataset.DataEvent
* TDataSet.CalculateFields,
* TDataset.EnableControls
* TDataLink.CalcFirstRecord
* TField.RefreshLookupList
* TField.CalcLookupValue

Comctrl:
* HandleSafeCallException



_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Unable to build the current Lazarus with fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-19 Thread Adrian Maier
On Nov 16, 2007 9:14 PM, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I disabled FakeMethods for 2.0.x.

Everything is fine after this fix. Thanks Mattias !


-- 
Adrian Maier

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Bee
Let me notice that we are in difficult situation on the other hand: we 
cannot be sure if some of the fpc/lazarus code wasn't used in Delphi , 
right ?


Correct. Borland/CodeGear must also be fair. Since fpc/laz is an open 
source project (means everybody can read the source codes), it's very 
possible that CodeGear/Borland had stolen/copy fpc/laz's codes, 
especially on some features that had been added to Delphi/Kylix after 
fpc had them already.


The only way is to check date of publication of our sources and of 
official Delphi sources.


+1

-Bee-

has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com

_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Recompile FPC unit

2007-11-19 Thread Joost van der Sluis
Op zaterdag 17-11-2007 om 10:34 uur [tijdzone +1000], schreef SteveG:
 I (think) I have found an error in the FmtBCD unit
 (from C:\lazarus\fpc\2.2.1\units\i386-win32\rtl )
 
 A simple empty dll will not load if this unit (or any 'using' it is used.
 So far as I can tell, the problem 'seems' to be with the following lines
 
 {$r+,q+,s+}
 { $r-,q-,s-}
 
 Remove the space at the front of the second line, problem disappears.

That could explain several db-bugs about building dll's when the db-unit
is used.

Joost

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] About and Help on Carbon Menu Bar

2007-11-19 Thread Tom Gregorovic
On Nov 18, 2007 11:15 PM, Tobias Giesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

Hi,

 is there a known best way to get the About My App menu item into the
 so-called Application Menu on the Mac OS Menu bar?

You have to use Carbon Menu Manager.

 Also is there a way to get the keyboard shortcut for Help to be Cmd-?
 rather than F1?


It is hardcoded in LCL application.inc:

procedure TApplication.NotifyKeyDownHandler(Sender: TObject;
  var Key: Word; Shift: TShiftState);
var
  i: Integer;
begin
  i:=FApplicationHandlers[ahtKeyDownAfter].Count;
  while FApplicationHandlers[ahtKeyDownAfter].NextDownIndex(i) do
TKeyEvent(FApplicationHandlers[ahtKeyDownAfter][i])(Sender,Key,Shift);
  if (Shift=[]) and (Key=VK_F1) then
ShowHelpForObjecct(Sender);
end;

We can adapt this to use platform specific key.

 If not I'll probably construct my menu directly using Carbon Menu
 Manager ...

Tom

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Waldenburg
 * TStringList.Grow

Once I have published alternatives to this.
However there cannot be done much more than
using different growing rates.

 * TStringList.QuickSort

Same here, a nonrecursive version based on something that I found in
an once famous free library and to which I gave proper credit.

Althought Quicksort is an idiot's choice for sorting strings.

 * TStringList.Find

Same here.
The only way to be different to Delphi's implementation
is to use another comparision.


Martin


_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Martin Waldenburg schrieb:
 * TStringList.Grow
 
 Once I have published alternatives to this.
 However there cannot be done much more than
 using different growing rates.
 
 * TStringList.QuickSort
 
 Same here, a nonrecursive version based on something that I found in
 an once famous free library and to which I gave proper credit.
 
 Althought Quicksort is an idiot's choice for sorting strings.

I guess the name gives no choice :)

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Waldenburg
Florian Klaempfl schrieb:
 Martin Waldenburg schrieb:
 Althought Quicksort is an idiot's choice for sorting strings.
 
 I guess the name gives no choice :)

a routine called Quicksort doesn't need to implement the Algorithm of
this name.
Nevertheless the one has stamped himself as one.


Martin

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [fpc-devel] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 19/11/2007, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 be based on Delphi/Kylix code. All such identified routines of sufficient
 complexity and/or likeliness have been or are in the process of being 
 rewritten
 from scratch using a clean room approach: by someone who is not intimately
 familiar with the current implementation, and only based on documentation
 written by other people. I am personally supervising this effort.

Well done guys!  I'm glad you took the first step and trying to get a
clean slate.  Lets hope Borland/CodeGear does the same thing, as it
works both ways. Also glad to here that the SIM tool came in handy.

 We are in a constructive dialog with people from CodeGear over this issue, and
 will report back later on the repercussions as far as current and previous FPC
 releases are concerned.

Are those discussions publicly available (newsgroup, forum) or are
they in private?  Would make for an interesting read to see what
CodeGear says and what they are doing from their side. After all, FPC
and Lazarus came up with some cool ideas of the years and our code is
a lot more public than theirs.

 PS: for those interested, here is the preliminary list of tainted routines we
 have identified. If you are aware of more cases, please let us know as soon as

The original discussion sure opened a can of worms  Lazarus, it
seems you guys are next. :)


Regards,
  - Graeme -


___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Martin Waldenburg wrote:

  * TStringList.Grow
 
 Once I have published alternatives to this.
 However there cannot be done much more than
 using different growing rates.

Which is exactly what we'll do.

 
  * TStringList.QuickSort
 
 Same here, a nonrecursive version based on something that I found in
 an once famous free library and to which I gave proper credit.
 
 Althought Quicksort is an idiot's choice for sorting strings.

Probably we could put a shellsort behind it, and no-one would notice :-)

 
  * TStringList.Find
 
 Same here.
 The only way to be different to Delphi's implementation
 is to use another comparision.

My opinion also, it's a simple binary search after all.

Standard textbook material stuff...

Michael.

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [fpc-devel] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

 On 19/11/2007, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  be based on Delphi/Kylix code. All such identified routines of sufficient
  complexity and/or likeliness have been or are in the process of being 
  rewritten
  from scratch using a clean room approach: by someone who is not intimately
  familiar with the current implementation, and only based on documentation
  written by other people. I am personally supervising this effort.
 
 Well done guys!  I'm glad you took the first step and trying to get a
 clean slate.  Lets hope Borland/CodeGear does the same thing, as it
 works both ways. Also glad to here that the SIM tool came in handy.
 
  We are in a constructive dialog with people from CodeGear over this issue, 
  and
  will report back later on the repercussions as far as current and previous 
  FPC
  releases are concerned.
 
 Are those discussions publicly available (newsgroup, forum) or are
 they in private?  Would make for an interesting read to see what
 CodeGear says and what they are doing from their side. After all, FPC
 and Lazarus came up with some cool ideas of the years and our code is
 a lot more public than theirs.

Those discussions are in private.

Michael.

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


[lazarus] Lazarus-0.9.24-fpc-2.2.0

2007-11-19 Thread Archangel
I am making an application for a customer and I tried to use the version 0. 
9. 24-fpc-2. 2. 0 but I had problems when trying to install the package of 
ZEUS. Did anybody see that? 
And after the retreat of TMASKEDIT they did find a similar one?

Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Martin Waldenburg schrieb:
 Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
 Probably we could put a shellsort behind it, and no-one would notice :-)
 
 for comparision intensive sorting a well implemented Mergesort
 beats everything,

For sorting large stringlists a radixsort might be even better?

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Paul Ishenin

Martin Waldenburg wrote:

Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
  

Probably we could put a shellsort behind it, and no-one would notice :-)



for comparision intensive sorting a well implemented Mergesort
beats everything,
especialy with caseinsensitive Unicode it can exceed  other
Algorithms 100 times for larger lists.
It uses slightly more memory thought.
It be improved even furter by doing some preprocessing
before doing the actual sort
If we are talking about TStringList.Sort then we will work with ansi 
strings. To compare ansi strings the best will be radial sort method. It 
doesnot use string compare at all - only chars compared level by level.


I've not searched for english description of method but using google 
translate you can read this page: http://algolist.ru/sort/radix_sort.php


There you can find C implementation of method. I also have somewhere 
pascal implementation.
Some years ago I did comparision of quicksort, qucksort with inserts 
(which a bit faster than usual quicksort) and radial sort. Radial sort 
was the fastest.


Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.

_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Waldenburg
Florian Klaempfl schrieb:

 For sorting large stringlists a radixsort might be even better?

not in my tests, I dit quite a lot.


Martin

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Damien Gerard


On Nov 19, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:




On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Florian Klaempfl wrote:


Martin Waldenburg schrieb:

Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
Probably we could put a shellsort behind it, and no-one would  
notice :-)


for comparision intensive sorting a well implemented Mergesort
beats everything,


For sorting large stringlists a radixsort might be even better?


Well, the solution is very simple :

TSortAlgorithm = (saBubble,saShell,saMerge,saRadix,saQuick);

TStringList = Class(TStrings);
 Property SortAlgorithm : TSortAlgorithm Read FSA Write FSA;
end;



I think it is a very good idea.


I await your contributions, I'll take care of the rest.

And I _am_ serious.




--
Damien Gerard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Waldenburg
Paul Ishenin schrieb:
 Martin Waldenburg wrote:
 Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
  
 Probably we could put a shellsort behind it, and no-one would notice :-)
 

 for comparision intensive sorting a well implemented Mergesort
 beats everything,
 especialy with caseinsensitive Unicode it can exceed  other
 Algorithms 100 times for larger lists.
 It uses slightly more memory thought.
 It be improved even furter by doing some preprocessing
 before doing the actual sort
 If we are talking about TStringList.Sort then we will work with ansi
 strings. To compare ansi strings the best will be radial sort method. It
 doesnot use string compare at all - only chars compared level by level.
 
 I've not searched for english description of method but using google
 translate you can read this page: http://algolist.ru/sort/radix_sort.php
 
 There you can find C implementation of method. I also have somewhere
 pascal implementation.
 Some years ago I did comparision of quicksort, qucksort with inserts
 (which a bit faster than usual quicksort) and radial sort. Radial sort
 was the fastest.
 
 Best regards,
 Paul Ishenin.

I was talking about sorting Algorithms using the fastest possible
comparision for a given case.
Meaning all Algorithms using the same comparision,
else their speed can hardly be compared at all.


Martin

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Waldenburg
Damien Gerard schrieb:
 Well, the solution is very simple :

 TSortAlgorithm = (saBubble,saShell,saMerge,saRadix,saQuick);

 TStringList = Class(TStrings);
  Property SortAlgorithm : TSortAlgorithm Read FSA Write FSA;
 end;

 
 I think it is a very good idea.

I think so too.


 I await your contributions, I'll take care of the rest.

 And I _am_ serious.

However I do not code anymore for the foreseenable future.
I've found more importand and also more rewarding tasks.
Simple trying to stay alive, which is quite hard in my case.
Getting married.
Well I already did it, just needs to be legalized for Germany,
which still involves some paper war.
Awaiting the birth of my son and see him growing up.

Being happy as much as possible.

Only sometimes I am reading these mails in iddle time,
just for the sake of old times.


Martin


_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] IDE Crashes on Mac OS (gtk)

2007-11-19 Thread Tom Gregorovic
On Nov 19, 2007 12:26 AM, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Nov 18, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:

  On Nov 18, 2007 10:36 PM, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In the same time How do you re-build Lazarus with GTK2 ?
 
  http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/GTK2_Interface#Using_the_Gtk2_interface_under_Mac_OS_X
 

 I don't want Gimp... But it is for a good cause !

  However I'm not sure it's worth it, as gtk2 also requires X11, so it's
  not a big improvement.
  One can build the IDE with Qt, but the code editor still has some
  problems.

 But I can work with GTK2 for the IDE and temporarily use QT for my
 app, waiting for the carbon widgetset.
 I am boring of Linux I prefer to use my laptop :)

  Under Carbon we still lack a Caret, but aside from this very
  important detail it works very well.
 

The caret should now work in IDE TSynedit under Carbon.

Tom

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Martin Waldenburg wrote:

 Damien Gerard schrieb:
  Well, the solution is very simple :
 
  TSortAlgorithm = (saBubble,saShell,saMerge,saRadix,saQuick);
 
  TStringList = Class(TStrings);
   Property SortAlgorithm : TSortAlgorithm Read FSA Write FSA;
  end;
 
  
  I think it is a very good idea.
 
 I think so too.
 
 
  I await your contributions, I'll take care of the rest.
 
  And I _am_ serious.
 
 However I do not code anymore for the foreseenable future.
 I've found more importand and also more rewarding tasks.
 Simple trying to stay alive, which is quite hard in my case.
 Getting married.
 Well I already did it, just needs to be legalized for Germany,
 which still involves some paper war.

I am familiar with such paper war, went through it myself in Belgium :-)

 Awaiting the birth of my son and see him growing up.
 
 Being happy as much as possible.

In that case I suggest throwing your PC out of the house.
Nothing good comes from it in my experience :-)

(but the same can be said from 99,99% of all other human activities)

Michael.

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


RE: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Stephen Dickason
 Well, the solution is very simple :

 TSortAlgorithm = (saBubble,saShell,saMerge,saRadix,saQuick);

 TStringList = Class(TStrings);
  Property SortAlgorithm : TSortAlgorithm Read FSA Write FSA;
 end;

 
 I think it is a very good idea.

I think so too.


TStringList = Class(TStrings);
   method SelectBestSortAlgorithm; // from count of strings/string type/
end;

*---

This E-Mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. It
is only intended for the use of the addressee indicated in this message.
If you are not an intended addressee of this email (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), the disclosure, copying or
delivering of the contents of this email to anyone else is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this e-mail by mistake
destroy the message and please notify us immediately by e-mail,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Information or opinions in this message that do not relate to the
business of ELCB Information Services shall be treated as neither 
given or endorsed by it.


*---

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


RE: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Stephen Dickason wrote:

  Well, the solution is very simple :
 
  TSortAlgorithm = (saBubble,saShell,saMerge,saRadix,saQuick);
 
  TStringList = Class(TStrings);
   Property SortAlgorithm : TSortAlgorithm Read FSA Write FSA;
  end;
 
  
  I think it is a very good idea.
 
 I think so too.
 
 
 TStringList = Class(TStrings);
method SelectBestSortAlgorithm; // from count of strings/string type/
 end;

You beat me to it :-)

Michael.

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] IDE Crashes on Mac OS (gtk)

2007-11-19 Thread Damien Gerard


On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Tom Gregorovic wrote:


On Nov 19, 2007 12:26 AM, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Nov 18, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:

On Nov 18, 2007 10:36 PM, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:

In the same time How do you re-build Lazarus with GTK2 ?


http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/GTK2_Interface#Using_the_Gtk2_interface_under_Mac_OS_X



I don't want Gimp... But it is for a good cause !

However I'm not sure it's worth it, as gtk2 also requires X11, so  
it's

not a big improvement.
One can build the IDE with Qt, but the code editor still has some
problems.


But I can work with GTK2 for the IDE and temporarily use QT for my
app, waiting for the carbon widgetset.
I am boring of Linux I prefer to use my laptop :)


Under Carbon we still lack a Caret, but aside from this very
important detail it works very well.




The caret should now work in IDE TSynedit under Carbon.



I use the last snapshot for OS X i386 and followed 
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Carbon_Interface

I've got this :

[...]
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonthemes.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonthemes.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonclipboard.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonclipboard.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonclipboard.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonclipboard.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/basiccodetools.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/basiccodetools.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/basiccodetools.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/basiccodetools.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/laz_xmlwrite.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/laz_xmlwrite.o

ld: can't write output file: ../startlazarus
Error: Error while linking
TExternalToolList.Run Exception: Error: Error while linking
TMainIDE.DoBuildLazarus: Build Lazarus without linking failed.


Should I take the subversion to test it ?





Tom

_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives




--
Damien Gerard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] IDE Crashes on Mac OS (gtk)

2007-11-19 Thread Damien Gerard



I use the last snapshot for OS X i386 and followed 
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Carbon_Interface

I've got this :

[...]
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonthemes.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonthemes.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonclipboard.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonclipboard.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonclipboard.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/lcl/units/i386- 
darwin/carbon/carbonclipboard.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/basiccodetools.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/basiccodetools.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/basiccodetools.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/basiccodetools.o
unknown stabs type 0xC0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/laz_xmlwrite.o
unknown stabs type 0xE0 in /usr/local/share/lazarus/components/ 
codetools/units/i386-darwin/laz_xmlwrite.o

ld: can't write output file: ../startlazarus
Error: Error while linking
TExternalToolList.Run Exception: Error: Error while linking
TMainIDE.DoBuildLazarus: Build Lazarus without linking failed.



Under Mac OS X 10.5.1



Should I take the subversion to test it ?








--
Damien Gerard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


[lazarus] About copyright infringement

2007-11-19 Thread George Lober

Hello,

Question: What if clean room approach code is the same as the other. 
Simplistically speaking, how many other ways can one write 1 + 1 = 2?  
Even if you may be able, most people would write it that way anyway. 
When you get right down to it, the set of standard mathematical and 
other functions available to a programmer is limited, and is used by 
everybody.  Most people I think want to write efficient code as well.


To take one of my own situations, quite a while back I needed to have a 
RoundTo() function in lazarus, so I wrote my own. At a much later point 
in time I actually looked at the Delphi code and saw that the only 
difference that code had was that it used the IntPower function. 
Except for this difference, structurally the two roundto functions were 
the same.


At the time I wrote my code I didn't use the IntPower function because I 
didn't know it was available. So hypothetically speaking, if I knew 
about the IntPower function at the time I wrote my code I probably would 
have written the same code as Delphi's. Would my code have been infringing?



Regards,
George

_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


[lazarus] keyboard hooking on X

2007-11-19 Thread Marc Santhoff
Hi,

some time ago I made a keyboard beeper with lazarus working on Win98 and
Win2k. I used the system hook for this purpose.

Is there something like this system wide keyboard hook on X, so that I
can port the beeper to *nix systems?

TIA,
Marc


_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2007-11-19 Thread Christian U.
If CodeGear are fair, they send you her Code in private so you have the 
same chance to find Copyright issues as they have.

Until this isnt the case everything they suppose the fpc team is mess.

regards
Christoan


Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:

Hello,

The FPC team has been recently made aware that a number of routines in the
Classes unit are apparently based on code originally from Borland/CodeGear.
After someone found a tool to automatically compare source code bodies to look
for structural similarities, we improved its support for Object Pascal (it's in
svn now) and used it to compare all FPC RTL and FCL units with their Kylix 3
and Delphi 7 equivalents (in so far these exist).

This enabled us to find more cases where code may have originally come from or
be based on Delphi/Kylix code. All such identified routines of sufficient
complexity and/or likeliness have been or are in the process of being rewritten
from scratch using a clean room approach: by someone who is not intimately
familiar with the current implementation, and only based on documentation
written by other people. I am personally supervising this effort.

This whole issue highlights a quite annoying problem though: one the one hand,
it is most certainly our responsibility to ensure that all committed code can be
legally licensed under FPC's modified LGPL license, and in particular does not
originate from Delphi/Kylix sources. On the other hand, we have to avoid reading
Delphi/Kylix code as much as possible since by doing so, we may become tainted
ourselves and unconsciously start writing code which is based too closely on
Borland/CodeGear code.

As everyone knows, we nevertheless all try our best to avoid committing tainted
code, see e.g. the comments attached to the following bug reports:
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=7680
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=8248
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=9770

And yet, from time to time it nevertheless happens anyway:
* http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=8661

So this is one area where you, our users, can make a big difference and help us
in preventing this from happening in the future, as well as with notifying us as
soon as possible when it does happen (or when you know it happened in the past).
Most importantly: please ensure that you *never* submit patches based on code 
copyrighted by third parties.


Let one thing be clear, however: none of the code that you wrote yourself can be
affected by this issue, as long as this code is not based on the tainted code
(whereby based means based on their source code; it does not mean, a.o.,
deriving from a tainted class, or calling a tainted routine -- in these cases
your own code is clean). Simply recompiling your program with an untainted
version of FPC will automatically clear your programs of any taint as well.

We are in a constructive dialog with people from CodeGear over this issue, and
will report back later on the repercussions as far as current and previous FPC
releases are concerned. 


For the FPC Team,

Michael.

PS: for those interested, here is the preliminary list of tainted routines we
have identified. If you are aware of more cases, please let us know as soon as
possible so we can evaluate them and put them in the queue for 
re-implementation!

Classes:
* ExtractStrings
* TParser.TokenComponentIdent
* TParser.NextToken
* TReader.DoFixupReferences
* TReader.ReadCollection
* TReader.FindComponentClass
* TWriter.WriteComponent
* TWriter.WriteComponentData
* TWriter.WriteProperties
* TPropFixup.MakeGlobalReference
* FindNestedComponent
* GlobalFixupReferences
* GetFixupInstanceNames
* RemoveFixupReferences (RemoveFixups in Delphi),
* RedirectFixupReferences
* GetFixupInstanceNames (GetFixupReferenceNames in Delphi),
* RemoveGlobalFixup
* RemoveFixups
* TStringList.Grow
* TStringList.QuickSort
* TStringList.Find
* TCollection.GetNamePath
* TFPList.Assign (Kylix: tlist.assign)
* TFPList.Delete (Kylix: tlist.delete)
* TList.Extract

Strutils:
* SearchBuf
* DecodeSoundexInt

Varutils:
* DoVarClearArray

Math:
* MomentSkewKurtosis:

Zstream:
* Needs complete re-implementation (was taken from the net...)

Db:
* TDataset.SetFieldValues
* TDataset.DataEvent
* TDataSet.CalculateFields,
* TDataset.EnableControls
* TDataLink.CalcFirstRecord
* TField.RefreshLookupList
* TField.CalcLookupValue

Comctrl:
* HandleSafeCallException

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives

  


_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] About copyright infringement

2007-11-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, George Lober wrote:

 Hello,
 
 Question: What if clean room approach code is the same as the other.
 Simplistically speaking, how many other ways can one write 1 + 1 = 2?  Even if
 you may be able, most people would write it that way anyway. When you get
 right down to it, the set of standard mathematical and other functions
 available to a programmer is limited, and is used by everybody.  Most people I
 think want to write efficient code as well.
 
 To take one of my own situations, quite a while back I needed to have a
 RoundTo() function in lazarus, so I wrote my own. At a much later point in
 time I actually looked at the Delphi code and saw that the only difference
 that code had was that it used the IntPower function. Except for this
 difference, structurally the two roundto functions were the same.
 
 At the time I wrote my code I didn't use the IntPower function because I
 didn't know it was available. So hypothetically speaking, if I knew about the
 IntPower function at the time I wrote my code I probably would have written
 the same code as Delphi's. Would my code have been infringing?

No, but you would have a bitch of a time trying to prove that :-)

Michael.

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


[lazarus] WinCE, howto open a networkpath?

2007-11-19 Thread John vd Waeter

Hi all,

With the INet components, I managed to use a UDP-component to frequently 
ask an internetserver for some data.


However, no traffic is generated when the handheld is powered up. I 
first have to initiate internet explorer, ask for some trivial page and 
after that my application can continu its UDP traffic.


I guess starting IE opened a networkpath and takes care of obtaining an 
ipnr etc.


What do I have to call to ensure a networkpath (GPRS, WiFi, whatever is 
available) is opened the same way IE does?


tia!
John

_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


[lazarus] GPU info

2007-11-19 Thread Lv

My question is along the lines of this paper.
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/555028.html;

Is there anybody who developed a unit or did any work for using GPU's 
for numerical computation with FPK/Lazarus?


Also, if anyone knows, what are the increase in speed expected over the 
best Intel or AMD has to offer compared to a current best GPU?



Developing a floating point (if such a GPU exists in double or extended 
precision) unit on a GPU should not be so difficult as the Unit only 
need to do a few basic elementary functions from which all the remainder 
of functions and special functions can be obtained.


Here is an overview of GPU issues.
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:SastpUrSdOMJ:www.gpgpu.org/sc2006/workshop/Apple_GPUintrinsics.pdf+gpu+numerical+floatinghl=enct=clnkcd=1gl=us;

Anyone have any info?

Thanks

_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] GPU info

2007-11-19 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Lv schrieb:
 My question is along the lines of this paper.
 http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/555028.html;
 
 Is there anybody who developed a unit or did any work for using GPU's
 for numerical computation with FPK/Lazarus?

Only in C.

 
 Also, if anyone knows, what are the increase in speed expected over the
 best Intel or AMD has to offer compared to a current best GPU?

Hard to say, depends on your application. A modern graphics card has a
peak performance of ~500 GFLOPS, a modern core CPU ~25 GFLOPS, so if you
can explore the performance of the GPU, you can get a speed up of 20 in
theory.

 
 
 Developing a floating point (if such a GPU exists in double or extended
 precision) unit on a GPU should not be so difficult as the Unit only
 need to do a few basic elementary functions from which all the remainder
 of functions and special functions can be obtained.
 
 Here is an overview of GPU issues.
 http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:SastpUrSdOMJ:www.gpgpu.org/sc2006/workshop/Apple_GPUintrinsics.pdf+gpu+numerical+floatinghl=enct=clnkcd=1gl=us;
 
 
 Anyone have any info?
 
 Thanks
 
 _
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
 

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] [r12910][Ubuntu][GTK2] Compilation failed

2007-11-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:03:48 +0100
Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Nov 18, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
 
  On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:51:00 +0100
  Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  On Nov 18, 2007, at 1:33 AM, Damien Gerard wrote:
 
  I've got the following compilation error after update the head
  revision 12910 :
 
 
  The r12883 is the last revision which compiles under Linux for me.
 
  In lcl/interfaces/gtk2/gtk2widgetset.inc(618,48)
  Identifier not found pango_layout_get_font_description
 
  It seems this has been fixed.
 
 
 
 I have made a rebuild from scratch and it doesn't work for me :(

You need a FPC 2.2.0, 2.0.4 or recent 2.3.1.

Mattias

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] [r12910][Ubuntu][GTK2] Compilation failed

2007-11-19 Thread Damien Gerard


On Nov 19, 2007, at 9:46 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:


On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:03:48 +0100
Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



On Nov 18, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:


On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:51:00 +0100
Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



On Nov 18, 2007, at 1:33 AM, Damien Gerard wrote:


I've got the following compilation error after update the head
revision 12910 :



The r12883 is the last revision which compiles under Linux for me.


In lcl/interfaces/gtk2/gtk2widgetset.inc(618,48)
Identifier not found pango_layout_get_font_description


It seems this has been fixed.




I have made a rebuild from scratch and it doesn't work for me :(


You need a FPC 2.2.0, 2.0.4 or recent 2.3.1.



Oo It works with 2.0.4 and not with the 2.1.4 ?

I use the package provided by the ubuntu and for this OS I would not  
like to use a specific version.




Mattias




--
Damien Gerard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] GPU info

2007-11-19 Thread Lv
Hi Florian, I tried to search for it but could only find a vague 
reference to Cephes.

Do you have a link to (hopefully) the source code in C?

Florian Klaempfl wrote:

Lv schrieb:



Is there anybody who developed a unit or did any work for using GPU's
for numerical computation with FPK/Lazarus?


Only in C.


_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] Lazarus IDE revamp

2007-11-19 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Nov 18, 2007 6:16 PM, James Chandler Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I like the Lazarus IDE as it is. Delphi 2005 and 2006 default IDE is less
 pleasant to use. IMO a copycat Laz IDE revamp along the lines of recent Delphi
 versions would not be an improvement.



But IMHO it wouldn't be a decline either. When I first moved away from
Delphi as my primary programming language I certainly missed the MDI
interface, but after using (mainly) JDev then Eclipse for 4+ years I
sure find the MDI interface rather messy... I've been wishing for a
SDI one, but I'm not convinced it's better, probably one can adapt to
either when obliguated to do so for some years ;-)

Cheers,
Flávio

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] [r12910][Ubuntu][GTK2] Compilation failed

2007-11-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:04:26 +0100
Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[...]
  In lcl/interfaces/gtk2/gtk2widgetset.inc(618,48)
  Identifier not found pango_layout_get_font_description
 
  I have made a rebuild from scratch and it doesn't work for me :(
 
  You need a FPC 2.2.0, 2.0.4 or recent 2.3.1.
 
 
 Oo It works with 2.0.4 and not with the 2.1.4 ?
 
 I use the package provided by the ubuntu and for this OS I would not  
 like to use a specific version.

2.1.4 was a development version. 2.0.4 and 2.2.0 are the released
stable versions.


Mattias

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] GPU info

2007-11-19 Thread Lord Satan
Hope this helps:

http://www.gpgpu.org/
http://developer.nvidia.com/object/cuda.html

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] GPU info

2007-11-19 Thread Lv

That is a great reference for me to dig into, thanks.

Lord Satan wrote:

Hope this helps:

http://www.gpgpu.org/
http://developer.nvidia.com/object/cuda.html

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives




_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   unsubscribe as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives