Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
Correct. The fixes branch, in this moment contains 0.9.24 (r. 12749 in trunk branch, 12771 in the fixes branch, but the only change is making it 0.9.24.1) + patches 12756, 12757 12760 12762 12797 12816 12831 12825 12946 from trunk. (I hope I didn't mistype too many, but an svn log -r 12749:HEAD will tell you the truth). Can we have more fixes from 9.25 applied to 9.24.1? :-D -Bee- has Bee.ography at: http://beeography.wordpress.com _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
Bee wrote: Correct. The fixes branch, in this moment contains 0.9.24 (r. 12749 in trunk branch, 12771 in the fixes branch, but the only change is making it 0.9.24.1) + patches 12756, 12757 12760 12762 12797 12816 12831 12825 12946 from trunk. (I hope I didn't mistype too many, but an svn log -r 12749:HEAD will tell you the truth). Can we have more fixes from 9.25 applied to 9.24.1? :-D Please suggest Marc _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
Please suggest I got the list from Change Logs. I suggest these: 0008029: [Database] Ctrl+C and Ctrl+Z don't work in a TDBMemo 0010248: [IDE] Some icons aren't showed into the component palette 0010198: [LCL] OnMouseWheel WheelDelta is opposite in sign for Win32 and GTK2 0010178: [LCL] Wrong RoundRect drawing with QT 0010170: [IDE] More appropriate window's title text 634: [-] TStaticText.BorderStyle 0010008: [Widgetset] TPageControl.GetImageIndex never gets called on Win32 0009996: [Patch] PageControl.TabVisible works incorrectly Please consider. :) There are some other as well, especially some that is targeting 9.23, but I'm not sure if it won't broken current stable release (9.24). Thank you. -Bee- has Bee.ography at: http://beeography.wordpress.com _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
Bee пишет: Please suggest I got the list from Change Logs. I suggest these: 0008029: [Database] Ctrl+C and Ctrl+Z don't work in a TDBMemo 0010248: [IDE] Some icons aren't showed into the component palette iirc all graphic issues I want to merge into stable branch are there 0010198: [LCL] OnMouseWheel WheelDelta is opposite in sign for Win32 and GTK2 yes 0010178: [LCL] Wrong RoundRect drawing with QT yes 0010170: [IDE] More appropriate window's title text 634: [-] TStaticText.BorderStyle no - big rewrite of TStaticText under gtk 0010008: [Widgetset] TPageControl.GetImageIndex never gets called on Win32 yes 0009996: [Patch] PageControl.TabVisible works incorrectly yes Please consider. :) Anyway, this is only my minds. Best regards, Paul Ishenin. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
Paul Ishenin schreef: Bee пишет: Please suggest I got the list from Change Logs. I suggest these: 0008029: [Database] Ctrl+C and Ctrl+Z don't work in a TDBMemo 0010248: [IDE] Some icons aren't showed into the component palette iirc all graphic issues I want to merge into stable branch are there 0010198: [LCL] OnMouseWheel WheelDelta is opposite in sign for Win32 and GTK2 yes 0010178: [LCL] Wrong RoundRect drawing with QT yes 0010170: [IDE] More appropriate window's title text 634: [-] TStaticText.BorderStyle no - big rewrite of TStaticText under gtk 0010008: [Widgetset] TPageControl.GetImageIndex never gets called on Win32 yes 0009996: [Patch] PageControl.TabVisible works incorrectly yes Please consider. :) Anyway, this is only my minds. Which revisions are these? Vincent _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
Bee ha scritto: When a tag (or branch) is made, this action itself also gets a revision nr. Therefore a tag/branch starts with a different revision, but can be based on the same trunk revision. So, a different rev number doesn't mean different codes? I mean between tags (9.24) and the fixes branch. Correct. The fixes branch, in this moment contains 0.9.24 (r. 12749 in trunk branch, 12771 in the fixes branch, but the only change is making it 0.9.24.1) + patches 12756, 12757 12760 12762 12797 12816 12831 12825 12946 from trunk. (I hope I didn't mistype too many, but an svn log -r 12749:HEAD will tell you the truth). The time from 0.9.24 tagging and official announcement was spent on installation and distribution issues, but the code is unchanged. The branch is based (i.e. tested) with fpc 2.2.0 (the same as for the 0.9.24 release), until further notice. Giuliano -- Giuliano Colla Whenever people agree with me, I always feel I must be wrong (O. Wilde) _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:19:19 +0700 Bee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Start using it right now at your own risk (the updates of two weeks ago have been tested, the last ones not yet) and participate to the fixes branch testing. Never mind the risk, I knew about it since the beginning. What I meant, is the source code on 9.24 fixes branch exactly the same with the source code on 9.24 release? Since 9.24 release was announced yesterday but the fixes updates are two weeks older, I doubt they are the same codes. If someone can guarantee that they are same codes, I'd like to use it. The release was built with rev 12749. The new patches are not included. Mattias _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
The release was built with rev 12749. The new patches are not included. Is 9.24 release is taken from tags folder? I saw it with rev 12750. And I saw the fixes branch is on rev 12958. I look them in laz's svn. Am I correct? Or any other repository that I don't know? -Bee- has Bee.ography at: http://beeography.wordpress.com _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
Bee wrote: The release was built with rev 12749. The new patches are not included. Is 9.24 release is taken from tags folder? I saw it with rev 12750. And I saw the fixes branch is on rev 12958. I look them in laz's svn. Am I correct? Or any other repository that I don't know? in svn are 3 folders: trunk, tags, branches trunk: current development tags: all releases branches: fixes on releases These aren't real folders, but more a shortcut to a certain revision. When a tag (or branch) is made, this action itself also gets a revision nr. Therefore a tag/branch starts with a different revision, but can be based on the same trunk revision. Marc _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
When a tag (or branch) is made, this action itself also gets a revision nr. Therefore a tag/branch starts with a different revision, but can be based on the same trunk revision. So, a different rev number doesn't mean different codes? I mean between tags (9.24) and the fixes branch. -Bee- has Bee.ography at: http://beeography.wordpress.com _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
[lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
Hi all, Especially to laz's svn maintainers... I saw laz 9.24 fixes branch on svn had been updated in the last 20 hours. I just want to confirm, is this branch exactly the same with 9.24 release? Because I see most updates had been done 2 weeks ago. If it is then I'll use this branch for my daily use, instead of the official stable release. Or should I wait for official announcement of its availability? TIA. -Bee- has Bee.ography at: http://beeography.wordpress.com _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
Bee ha scritto: Hi all, Especially to laz's svn maintainers... I saw laz 9.24 fixes branch on svn had been updated in the last 20 hours. I just want to confirm, is this branch exactly the same with 9.24 release? Because I see most updates had been done 2 weeks ago. If it is then I'll use this branch for my daily use, instead of the official stable release. Or should I wait for official announcement of its availability? You have two options. 1) Start using it right now at your own risk (the updates of two weeks ago have been tested, the last ones not yet) and participate to the fixes branch testing. 2) Wait for official announcement. Then use at your own risk ;-), but knowing that what you get has been at least tested in a couple of platforms before being committed. Giuliano -- Giuliano Colla Whenever people agree with me, I always feel I must be wrong (O. Wilde) _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Re: [lazarus] is laz 9.24 fixes on svn ready to be used?
1) Start using it right now at your own risk (the updates of two weeks ago have been tested, the last ones not yet) and participate to the fixes branch testing. Never mind the risk, I knew about it since the beginning. What I meant, is the source code on 9.24 fixes branch exactly the same with the source code on 9.24 release? Since 9.24 release was announced yesterday but the fixes updates are two weeks older, I doubt they are the same codes. If someone can guarantee that they are same codes, I'd like to use it. 2) Wait for official announcement. Then use at your own risk ;-), but knowing that what you get has been at least tested in a couple of platforms before being committed. If the announcement wouldn't be too far from today, I might better wait for it. :) BTW, if there are some important fixes or features on development branch, to whom should I request to merge it to fixes branch? To Guiliano? Also, which fpc is officially used by this fixes branch? fpc stable (2.2.0) or fpc fixes (2.2.1)? I'm interesting to be involved in the testing. What should I do? FYI, I'm using fpc v.2.2.1 on Linux Ubuntu on i386 machine, but I'm new to SVN system. :-D TIA. -Bee- has Bee.ography at: http://beeography.wordpress.com _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
