Re: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] feature add

2002-01-18 Thread Matt Schalit

Jacques NIlo wrote:
 
  How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf
  and not lrp anymore?
  
 .lrp files
  
  lrp all over sourceforge documents.
  
  Perhaps we could make use of a change of the suffix in
 the package names
  to make a distinction between the older lrp packages
 and a new new more
  featurefull leaf format :-) (OMG what topic did I bring
 up)
 What about .tgz ? It corresponds exactly to what .lrp
 packages are:
 tar xzvf package.lrp unpack any .lrp package
 tar czvf package.lrp .  creates any .lrp package
 The only specificity of an .lrp package are the files
 in /var/lib/lrpkg. It does not correspond to a specific
 storage format.
 Jacques


Not to mention it messes up Charle's web server which
thought .lrp file was a text file :-)

I don't think I've ever seen him go rg
before :-)  Kinda like Charlie Brown, heh.

Matt

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



Re: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] feature add

2002-01-17 Thread Ewald Wasscher

Matt Schalit wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Charles,

For Dachenstein, not having set it up yet myself.  Perhaps a specific menu item to 
back up the ssh keys...
hThat just doesn't sound right.  Well, I'll post it anyway to generate 
thought.

-sp



How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf 
and not lrp anymore?

   .lrp files

lrp all over sourceforge documents.

Perhaps we could make use of a change of the suffix in the package names 
to make a distinction between the older lrp packages and a new new more 
featurefull leaf format :-) (OMG what topic did I bring up)

Ewald Wasscher


___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



Re: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] feature add

2002-01-17 Thread Jacques NIlo

 How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf
 and not lrp anymore?
 
.lrp files
 
 lrp all over sourceforge documents.
 
 Perhaps we could make use of a change of the suffix in
the package names
 to make a distinction between the older lrp packages
and a new new more
 featurefull leaf format :-) (OMG what topic did I bring
up)
What about .tgz ? It corresponds exactly to what .lrp
packages are:
tar xzvf package.lrp unpack any .lrp package
tar czvf package.lrp .  creates any .lrp package
The only specificity of an .lrp package are the files
in /var/lib/lrpkg. It does not correspond to a specific
storage format.
Jacques

--
Profitez de l'offre spéciale Tiscali Liberty Surf !
50% de temps en plus pendant 3 mois sur tous les forfaits Internet.

http://register.libertysurf.fr/subscribe_fr/signup.php3



___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



RE: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] feature add

2002-01-15 Thread Luis.F.Correia

I can support that!

In fact I was rather surprised that this question took all
this time to come up.

If we did branch away from LRP, we definitely should be 
named differently. In every possible way.

But that is just my humble opinion. grin

-Original Message-
From: Matt Schalit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] feature add


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Charles,
 
 For Dachenstein, not having set it up yet myself.  Perhaps a specific 
 menu item to back up the ssh keys... hThat just doesn't sound 
 right.  Well, I'll post it anyway to generate thought.
 
 -sp


How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf 
and not lrp anymore?

   .lrp files

lrp all over sourceforge documents.

I could go on, but it's not really important
to getting the thing to make anybody some $$.

Matt

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



Re: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] feature add

2002-01-15 Thread Mike Noyes

At 2002-01-14 23:12 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf
and not lrp anymore?

.lrp files

 lrp all over sourceforge documents.

45 hits for Linux Router Project
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Linux+Router+Project%22+site%3Aleaf.source 
forge.net

523 hits for LRP
http://www.google.com/search?q=LRP+site%3Aleaf.sourceforge.net

223 hits for Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Linux+Embedded+Appliance+Firewall%22+site% 
3Aleaf.sourceforge.net

2200 hits for LEAF
http://www.google.com/search?q=LEAF+site%3Aleaf.sourceforge.net

It looks like things are changing. It's just taking a while. Most of the 
LRP hits are in the individual developer content devel tree.

--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/


___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



Re: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] feature add

2002-01-14 Thread Matt Schalit

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Charles,
 
 For Dachenstein, not having set it up yet myself.  Perhaps a specific menu item to 
back up the ssh keys...
 hThat just doesn't sound right.  Well, I'll post it anyway to generate 
thought.
 
 -sp


How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf 
and not lrp anymore?

   .lrp files

lrp all over sourceforge documents.

I could go on, but it's not really important
to getting the thing to make anybody some $$.

Matt

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel