Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Changes to the ledgersmb.org website

2016-05-07 Thread John Locke

(resend from my subscribed email address...)

Hi,

I've made the following changes:

* Allowed much bigger user pictures to upload, but set a server-side 
preset (the unused Square Thumbnail) to resize user pictures to 44x44, 
which is what 4em generated in Chrome)
* Turned on "Panelizer" and applied to article teasers -- with no 
further configuration, this removed the authoring info on the teasers
* Set up a Visual Regression Testing tool (but did the baseline at this 
point, after making the previous changes)
* Applied the two remaining CSS fixes from Erik: making the user image 
"display: inline-block" and giving them 4px rounded corners


* Ran the visual regression testing, you can see the results here: 
http://ledgersmb.org/lsmb_shots/gallery.html


Regarding best practices, I think we already have a view of content that 
takes a tag name from the path to filter, so you probably didn't need to 
create that. http://ledgersmb.org/topic/installation ... it looks like 
your view filters down to only articles, so it shows less -- no harm 
having that here, especially if you want to curate further...


Cheers,
John


On 05/07/2016 05:30 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:

Hi John,


In preparation of the 1.5 release, I've been looking at ways to 
publish installation instructions and notes. While doing so, I found 
that there wasn't really a structure for showing installation 
instructions on the ledgersmb.org  site. Under 
the Documentation menu item in the Main menu, there's now an 
"Installation" link which points to http://ledgersmb.org/installation. 
It's a new view I created by collecting all contents of type "Article" 
with the tag "Installation".


Would you say that that's the right way to go? Or should I have 
created a separate content type? I'm thinking that may be overkill.


One thing that I've noted and never brought up before: I think the 
"user picture" on each article is *way* too big. It takes up a lot of 
valuable screen estate. Can we do away with it in the teaser layout, 
only showing the textual submission data (user and date)? Then maybe 
shrink the image to 4ems-width max, with the submission data on the 
right of it, instead of on the next row? (Saves some vertical more 
screen estate.)


In my browser I added two rules to achieve the bit of the user picture 
in the regular ("Content") view:


.user-picture img {
width: 4em;
}
.user-picture {
display: inline-block;
}


I was able to achieve the bit I mean about the teaser section with 
this rule:


.node-teaser .meta.submitted img {
display: none;
border-radius: 3px;   // the pictures look a lot more friendly 
when I add that

}

I hope you all agree this step makes the site's content much more 
accessible; an improvement.


Could you put these into effect?



--
Bye,

Erik.

http://efficito.com  -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.


--
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z___
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel


[Ledger-smb-devel] Changes to the ledgersmb.org website

2016-05-07 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi John,


In preparation of the 1.5 release, I've been looking at ways to publish
installation instructions and notes. While doing so, I found that there
wasn't really a structure for showing installation instructions on the
ledgersmb.org site. Under the Documentation menu item in the Main menu,
there's now an "Installation" link which points to
http://ledgersmb.org/installation. It's a new view I created by collecting
all contents of type "Article" with the tag "Installation".

Would you say that that's the right way to go? Or should I have created a
separate content type? I'm thinking that may be overkill.

One thing that I've noted and never brought up before: I think the "user
picture" on each article is *way* too big. It takes up a lot of valuable
screen estate. Can we do away with it in the teaser layout, only showing
the textual submission data (user and date)? Then maybe shrink the image to
4ems-width max, with the submission data on the right of it, instead of on
the next row? (Saves some vertical more screen estate.)

In my browser I added two rules to achieve the bit of the user picture in
the regular ("Content") view:

.user-picture img {
width: 4em;
}
.user-picture {
display: inline-block;
}


I was able to achieve the bit I mean about the teaser section with this
rule:

.node-teaser .meta.submitted img {
display: none;
border-radius: 3px;   // the pictures look a lot more friendly when I
add that
}

I hope you all agree this step makes the site's content much more
accessible; an improvement.

Could you put these into effect?



-- 
Bye,

Erik.

http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
--
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z___
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel