Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Maxspeed tags in Australia
Hi, On 01/06/12 13:13, Nick Hocking wrote: Although the usefullness(or correctness) of these tags is not being discussed in talk-au, there appears to be a concensus (7-0) about removing them now. Ok, I've discussed this off-list with Nick and did a test run for 1000 (of roughly a quarter million) ways. Here is one example touched by the script: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4018604 The license change view has picked up that this way doesn't carry any of JohnSmith's changes any longer and therefore it is now colored yellow: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfelon=151.94918lat=-27.56668zoom=17 Of course one can simply switch off the yellow stuff with the check box on the left if one finds it confusing - yellow is just a way for OSMI to tell you that it considers this way OK based in its own reckoning rather than because it has a squeaky clean history. If people are happy with that, I will run the script for the remaining ways. But don't expect miracles - it's a lot of data and it will take one or two weeks to complete. Bye Frederik ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Maxspeed tags in Australia
2012/1/13 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: Ok, I've discussed this off-list with Nick and did a test run for 1000 (of roughly a quarter million) ways. Here is one example touched by the script: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4018604 Nice, this will also significantly change the relation between maxspeed:source (mainly John Smith) and the earlier and by presumbaly more different users attached source:maxspeed http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/maxspeed:source#values http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source:maxspeed#values cheers, Martin ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
[OSM-legal-talk] Way with almost nothing left but created by decliner
Hi, here's an interesting example from the German forum. A way that was created by a decliner but later edited by 10 others; of everything the decliner originally created, only the very first node remains, everything else has been lost in the editing process. OSMI duly paints this way in red - created by decliner, no chance of survival. Maybe we need some sort of soft(er) approach for cases like this. Of all the information currently present in that way, less than 5% are remnants of what the decliner originally created, still we allow them to decide the fate of the whole object. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Way with almost nothing left but created by decliner
Am 13.01.2012 23:42, schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hi, here's an interesting example from the German forum. A way that was created by a decliner but later edited by 10 others; of everything the decliner originally created, only the very first node remains, everything else has been lost in the editing process. OSMI duly paints this way in red - created by decliner, no chance of survival. Instead of starting yet another thread on the subject on the German forum, the OP could have naturally simply remapped the way, which would have assured it 100% chance of survival . Simon ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Way with almost nothing left but created by decliner
Even if one way has been spotted and remapped, there might be many similar cases that were not spotted and could not be remapped. If there is a row of new CT compatible nodes, anything between them should be considered clean - there is no authorship of the creator of the original way... LM_1 2012/1/13 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch: Am 13.01.2012 23:42, schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hi, here's an interesting example from the German forum. A way that was created by a decliner but later edited by 10 others; of everything the decliner originally created, only the very first node remains, everything else has been lost in the editing process. OSMI duly paints this way in red - created by decliner, no chance of survival. Instead of starting yet another thread on the subject on the German forum, the OP could have naturally simply remapped the way, which would have assured it 100% chance of survival . Simon ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
